Heh, worked fine on radiators back in the old days, not sure I'd try it on the newer ones but if one must to get you through a short period then live dangerously. Somewhere up in my brain cell is what the stuff was they put in it to plug the hole. I want to say coconut fibers.Gosh, I haven't thought about that stuff for years! There was always something really weird about that stuff.
So you like a fat around the grip area.? Thicker ,or more set back.. I personally like very thin from front middle finger to thumb if I don’t make a thumb plate.. IE,WEATHERBY style. Usually with a bit of inner palm swell.It's a neat feature on the stock. The 95 does not need much more height in the cheekpiece for a reasonably sized scope. And good cheekpieces are easy to come by. So I'm not sure it's an earth shaking development. It will help guys using giant scopes to get better cheek weld and I suppose that's an added value.
The stock modification that I feel is needed is the grip/palm area. The HW rifles are all way too slender. The proper finger position on the trigger is impossible. Even on the thumbhole stocks. The grip area seems to be designed for a child.
I paid extra for a walnut stock and I'm hesitant to wrap an inch of tape around it to get good ergonomics. If they had included this much needed design change into the stock it would be great. Sadly the photos look like the grip is as skinny as ever.
I think they should offer a synthetic stock like the blackline on the 95. I would buy one in an instant. A nice fat grip area you could feel in your palm would be great. At least if you wanted to put a roll of sports tape on the grip to get it to fit you could do that without ruining the look of the wood stock.
They are great rifles and this looks like an answer to a problem they didn't really have. It's a cool feature and many guys will love it. But IMO it sidesteps the obvious stock change that would make a real difference in ergonomics.
It will be Sporter Roll over design. Maybe thumb plate. I’ve toyed the thumb hole idea but it’s just not my sandbox.Another fine
Wierdrock design
Anxious to see A.G.R. stock
I dispise stipling. Pressed Checkering is second.. I’d rather have a well fitted bald stock.. That being said, I believe a stock isn’t finished until checkered. It makes them in many ways.I think the stock looks pretty good for factory. It has stippling which is a nice touch, and I like the adjustable cheek piece as well.
Glad you are safe and your house is intact. Apparently they knew a thing about construction in the late 40's and early 50's.Sarasota, the eye went right over the house basically. We were boarded up and out of state. Somehow this 1951 bungalow survived.
View attachment 503856
View attachment 503857
Of course you could have followed the sellers instructions on how to pay. If his terms are not agreeable to you move on.Yeah people like you and 90% in here asking for buyer to pay the fee. That is the problem. It is against TOS for sellers to ask buyers to pay the fees or ask for friends and family. One, you ain't my family, 2 you the seller pays the fee. It's that simple. I made this thread cause I am tried of seeing folks in the classified asking buyers to pay the fees when rules is, SELLER PAYS THE FEES. smh.
Ps: might want to look up paypal TOS b4 using it. That's my advice.
It was Harry Fuller in Australia who measured the down range spin rates using the method I described earlier. He used 0.25 JSB King pellets fired out to 200 yards at 890 ft/sec. I just used his data to obtain the spin damping. Spin damping moment coefficients are very small but so is the spin inertia of a pelletThere is the story of the Experimentalist and the Theoretician, both on death row facing execution...
Ballisticboy is the experimentalist! I'd be interested in his actual measurment of spin damping.
Anyway, as I understand it, spin is damped in flight by air resistance or drag across the circumference of the pellet/slug, similar to what slows the pellet in its flight path but in the roundabout direction. We can calculate the approximate rotational velocity of the surface of the pellet/slug when it leaves the barrel, and compare that with the flight velocity. We know how much the flight is slowed by drag, and we know that drag increases with the square of velocity, so if the rotational velocity is similar to the flight velocity, it might slow down similarly, and if it is less then it slows down much less.
Let's take those Javelin 40gr slugs as an example. They are 0.217" in diameter. Circumference is pi*diameter, so 3.14 * 0.217 = 0.68" around. If it was spinning at 780rps when it left the barrel at 1040fps, then the surface would be spinning at 0.68 inches per revolution * 780 revolutions per second = 532 inches per second or around 44 feet per second. That also can be calculated (as a confirmation) by the twist rate, 1 in 16, where 1040 feet per second times 12 inches per foot / 16 inches per twist gives 780 twists per second or revolutions per second. And then it fits into the calculations preceeding to give the 44fps.
That all is very slow relative to the flight speed. I wouldn't expect the rotation to slow much as drag is low at that speed.
Mike
I have one of these on mine in the Grey color, they are Great. Well Made, and really change the look of the gunWe have a magnetic foster fitting cover that addresses the unsightly shape of the bottle.