Treefrog

Treefrog

Member From Western NC, United States
View Feedback Add Feedback
Messages
1,066
Featured content
0
Reaction score
1,705
Level
1
Joined
Last seen
Follow
Start conversation

Profile posts Latest activity Postings Featured content About

  • Treefrog
    Challenge accepted, challenge met. A knotty section of maple from the recent disaster. It couldn't stand up to 37 tons of pressure.

    PB180177.JPG
    Treefrog
    We've made a little progress here. Most of the downed trees have been taken care of. Most of the rest is up to me. The chainsaw only has an 18" bar and a few of these trees are over 30" through, so it will be fun! Local firewood prices have taken a HUGE dive.

    We do have power, gas and internet. So there's that. Potable water is somewhere in the future, though.

    PA280130.JPG
    Report Reply
    • Like
    • Wow
    Reactions: AmosBurton and rsfrid
    Peashooter
    My friend have that size trees all around his house, everything will be pancake if one of them come down.
    And storms here do topple trees now and then.
    Cashing in insurance is probably the best thing that could happen for my M8 though, that house / farm he got,,,,,, very rudimentary / run down place.
    It had also been on the market for 6 years when he got it, that say a little about the place.
    Treefrog
    Well... We lived. It was a bit dicey for a while. A broken gas line nearly took the house before I was able to shut it off. Luckily no trees fell on us. Our neighbors weren't so lucky. Eight houses here have trees on them.

    P9270079.JPGP9270081.JPGP9270074.JPG
    Report Reply
    • Like
    • Wow
    Reactions: Ta-Ta Toothie, Ezana4CE, RM.510bigbore and 4 others
    Peashooter
    Daum.
    Denmark dont have that big winds, or that is some times we have big storms, and some forrest areas can be flattened to a degree.
    Also get a tree across a road now and then, but i have never seen this personally and we have been known to venture out into " extreme " weather when authorities advise against doing just that.

    O i forgot, once in a forrest we did come across a pretty big Oak that had fallen, we hooked our two 4 X 4 cars up for a double pull and pulled it a few 100 M down the paved road in the forrest, just to mess with the people that found it in the morning.

    The reason forrests get flattened here now and then is, its not really forrests but plantations, if you look at Denmark from a satellite, you will fine lines of trees in many green areas of the country, this is CUZ we also wiped that out a long time ago.

    Biggest problem for us is probably flooding after heavy rain fall, some places are showing weakness in this regard, and clearly things have to be beefed up to cope with future events.
    It is not houses floating down the river ASO CUZ we barely have a river here big enough to float a shed let alone a house, also very few wood houses here, so that aint going to float.
    But flooded houses - basements and so on, also all the idiots that have build a house / summerhouse right at the waters edge.
    The town of Vejle here have been flooded in places 2 times this year, 2 feet of water will still ruin a lot of stuff.

    Earlier this year apparently someone tried to fell roadside trees onto cars driving past,,,, i kid you not.

    Also in the past weeks, someone have felled / stolen road side trees in a area of the country,,,,, and OK firewood is not cheap but come on, how the hell you you get away with 30 or so trees some 3 feet in diameter.
    WoodWelder
    That must of felt like days wondering "when are these guys coming to turn the gas off"?

    Scary!
    Peashooter
    Yeah gas is nasty, houses in Denmark have not had gas since the late 70ties or so, and back then it was also just for stoves / cooking as far as i remember.
    Also about that time we started pulling those awful air wires and put things in the ground where it belong.
    Treefrog
    And next in the hit parade... A Cox Bushmaster from 1975. The motor is locked up and it needs a new rudder. I have a few spare engines but I doubt I'll ever run it. It's way too noisy. I had a bunch of different ones. Good times while getting hearing damage...

    I have a runable Testors P40 as well. Gotta find the right kid to give them to (along with some earplugs).

    P8240036.JPG
    Report Reply
    • Like
    • Love
    Reactions: WoodWelder and Peashooter
    View previous comments…
    Treefrog
    That's very interesting. I wouldn't have though of using an RC boat to move bait, but if it works... 120 klicks is fast! I remember an old Testors .049 P-51 that I had. I did the radius math, counted revolutions and timed it. It was going a whopping 34-mph. I was so disappointed...

    The battery powered stuff just doesn't do it for me. The lady gave me a drone for a birthday and I flew it one time. Now it sits here. Trying to figure a way of getting rid of it without her noticing. For some reason engines appeal more than motors do. Kind of like pumpers over springers or PCPs.
    Peashooter
    Well i must of course admit that a little 3.5 cc motor, revving to 40K RPM and putting out several ponies,,,,, that is indeed impressive, the whine is also good.

    My friends old 5B with the Dominator exhaust,,,, also very loud


    His T model, not so loud but have caught a lot of air, and almost ripped off my head as cameraman.

    WoodWelder
    I almost forgot about those planes. I had one that was held by strings so it wouldn't get away. All it did was go around in circles and wait till it run out of fuel then had to spin in circles so as to not crash land it. Remote controls to purchase in those years were insanely expensive.
    Yeah, the noise and smell of the COX fuel was almost unbearable. :ROFLMAO:
    Treefrog
    It, too, lives! It's a Wilesco D5. It does need a gasket or two. The knocking you hear is the base rattling on the grill. It's slightly bent. Now to figure out the horsepower.

    Treefrog
    A little more searching turned up the original. From Christmas of '73, I think. Still in the box with the instructions. It's a little rough and was seized up, but a little oil freed up the fly wheel. Decades spent in a damp basement have taken their toll. It runs at a much higher rpm than the other one, iirc. It will be fun to find out exactly how fast it goes.

    P8240034.JPG
    P8240032.JPG
    Treefrog
    It lives! I was able to line the fuel-tray with foil and use some candle wax with a paper-towel wick to add heat. The rpms are a bit lower than I remember, but I guess the governor has something to do with that. The cats don't care for it and the dogs don't know what to think.

    Report Reply
    • Love
    Reactions: WoodWelder and ThomasT
    ThomasT
    Hello @Treefrog , that is great! Real steam engines are designed to run slow and produce a ton of power. I use to design and build small stationary steam engines and the goal was to make one that would run super slow.

    ThomasT
    Treefrog
    That's interesting, Thomas. The Wilesco model website says around 1500 rpm for some models, but this one was running at around 600. I think it's because I was using candle wax as fuel instead of the fuel tabs that they sell. Sterno was the go-to fuel when I was a kid. I think wax burns at a lower temp. You can find more of these at https://www.wilesco.de/en/
    Treefrog
    I ran across this at my folks' house yesterday. It's been a lot of years since it's been run. I used to love those things. Thinking I'll clean it up and get it going. Now where did I put that erector set?

    P8210018.JPG
    Report Reply
    • Like
    • Love
    Reactions: JohnTaylor, WoodWelder, Peashooter and 1 other person
    View previous comments…
    Motorhead
    I had one of those as a young man. Would run it on a scoop of STERNO fuel placed in the burn tray. Pretty clean for 50 +/- years old (y)
    Peashooter
    It is not Union Pacific Big Boy,,,,, but steam is pretty cool.
    As i recall from smoke diver course water expand 900 X when it turn to steam.

    Needless to say all of my G-scale trains are steam models.
    Treefrog
    Thanks, guys. Not long after I got it (in '73), I picked up my first pellet gun. After that, all my Sterno money went for pellets and co2. I never did really power much with it. A waxed-cardboard paddle-wheel boat for a Robert Fulton steamboat demonstration for school. It got me an A.
    Treefrog
    Politics aside...

    I ran across this photo a few days ago on X. I've seen bullets as they traveled to their destination in the past, but only if they were traveling away and the lighting was just right. The photographer has said that he was using a shutter speed of 1/8000 of a second, but that doesn't seem right. An (assumed) .223 round starts at 2800-3200 fps (depending on barrel length and bullet weight) and would be going a bit less than that at 140 yards.

    The streak appears to be about a foot long. That implies a shutter speed much less than stated, I think...

    Thoughts?

    Trump-Bullet.jpeg
    Report Reply
    • Like
    Reactions: RM.510bigbore, WoodWelder and ThomasT
    View previous comments…
    WoodWelder
    I'm not sure if shutter speed has anything to do with it?

    Anything that is recorded live can be put thru editing software to slow the projectile footage to milliseconds?
    Treefrog
    It's my understanding that the photog that took that shot was shooting with a special camera at 1/8000th of a second and at 60-frames a second. (Perfect for catching a "pink-mist" situation.) He's a still-photographer. I do not know why he chose those settings. My much older Nikon DSLR won't do near that.

    If the bullet was moving at 2800-fps, a shutter speed of 1/2800th of a second would show the bullet leaving about a one-foot streak. This pic doesn't jibe with what's being reported. The streak should be much shorter. I'm hoping someone will check my math here.

    I can say that there is SO much that's hinky about this entire situation. I'm no conspiracy theorist, but there's a lot about this that just ain't computing.
    Stubbers
    That is not the bullet but the jet stream / turbulence from it which is still impressive to catch, imo.
    Treefrog
    I spent yesterday on jury duty (but wasn't selected). It was a bit of an eye-opener. The thug on trial (for felon in possession of a firearm, ADW, and shooting into a vehicle) cleaned up really nice. He kept his mouth shut the whole day, too. The lawyers concentrated on two things. The jurors' views on the police and on the race of the particular thug on trial. Looking forward to seeing how things play out.
    Treefrog
    Regarding 'The Giant Killer' thread that was just killed...

    His was a life worth knowing about. Particularly at this time.

    Richard J. Flaherty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Resources
Menu