Conflicting Max Fill Information - FX Impact M3

I found a bunch of threads that have discussed this but never did see a response from FX, just statements from individuals that they prefer not to fill over 220 or maybe 230 BAR and some saying FX recommends not going over 250 BAR even though you can go to 300 BAR with the FX M3 which might be true. They sure didn't say so in the owner's manual, which would be the logical place to make recommendations. The current FX Impact M3 owner's manual clearly states that the max system fill is 300 Bar NOT 250 Bar. I have seen photos of some FX M3 guns what have a dial that goes beyond 300 BAR. The dial on the FX M3 I have in my hands stops at 250 BAR. The engraving on the gun says max 250 Bar so that is two votes from FX for 250 max and one vote for 300 max. If it was a democracy based gun, then I suppose 250 BAR would win. It sure seems contradictory to me to recommend two rather widely apart (720 PSI) max fill levels, both in writing, arriving in the same box.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ram2jeep
My point was not that I wanted to fill it to 300 or even thought it should be OK. I have been filling to no more than 250 because that is what is stated on the gun. The point was that in my opinion the manual is incorrect and gives the WRONG information in an unclear way, that could damage someone's gun or maybe themselves. I don't know if 750 PSI over max is a danger to the person filling and using the gun or just to the gun itself. It has obviously confused a large number of people since the M3 came out. I am standing by my original assessment that a properly written manual should not state 300 BAR max fill anywhere in it if it is shipped with a 250 BAR max gun.
 
Agreed, very dangerous, in my opinion, too. You're not the first to be confused and high-pressure air is nothing to have any confusion about. If they wanted to state the gun "could" handle 300 BAR, they should have said it with the warning that special equipment needed for that pressure. Maybe, in Sweden, they look at things and explain things differently than we do. WM
 
Agreed, very dangerous, in my opinion, too. You're not the first to be confused and high-pressure air is nothing to have any confusion about. If they wanted to state the gun "could" handle 300 BAR, they should have said it with the warning that special equipment needed for that pressure. Maybe, in Sweden, they look at things and explain things differently than we do. WM

That certainly could be a reason for it. I used to do a lot of writing and translating for owner's manuals and I can tell you that an engineer is not the guy you want writing the owner's manual! They would sometimes ask us to write the manual before the product even existed. We would run the manuals past several "regular" people whos native tongue was the language we were working on before it went to press.
 
@Geezerhood ,
You are correct. Your manual should not list 300 bar. Cross it out and write in 250. As others have already pointed out, following the markings in your receiver/action. Go with the limit of the weakest link.

Manuals aren't perfect. I would guess they are frequently written to cover several models and configurations and they just don't spend the time to make every single manual specific for what you purchased or assembled. The voices of experience here will help guide you.

Your valve spring and hammer spring and regulator may work in better balance at the lower pressure stated on the receiver.

It may be possible to fill to 300 a few times and get away with it before some seals start leaking. It took more than a year of doing this for the seals in my Edgun regulators to begin leaking and cause regulator creep. I think marketing has hooked on to that higher rating because people want to get more shots per fill.

The standard Buna and 70 durometer o-rings and grooves that are typically used in airguns without special backup rings and such start to deform and leak more readily as you approach 250ish and beyond.

GL,
Feinwerk
 
Last edited:
So are all of you saying that Fx is marketing 300 bar upgrade bottles knowing it will cause stress on their rifles and premature failure in order to meet the demand for more shots?
I've been using a 300 bar bottle, fill it to about 275, on my Maverick. The main reason is I can shoot my usual four mags at the target, then leave the rifle on the dining room table with a mag next to it for any wayward pests the happen upon my backyard without having to refill the bottle.
 
So are all of you saying that Fx is marketing 300 bar upgrade bottles knowing it will cause stress on their rifles and premature failure in order to meet the demand for more shots?
I've been using a 300 bar bottle, fill it to about 275, on my Maverick. The main reason is I can shoot my usual four mags at the target, then leave the rifle on the dining room table with a mag next to it for any wayward pests the happen upon my backyard without having to refill the bottle.
The only additional stress from using a 300 bar bottle would be to the first regulator. Obviously it's designed to handle it.
 
That's what I was thinking too. All that additional air pressure isn't getting past that. Makes sense.
Until your reg fails and goes into the bypass mode. Now you have 275-300 leaning on your second reg. Can probably still handle it by why. Filling guns is so easy nowadays. Unless you’re still hand pumping these things. I fill both my Impacts to 250b for routine shooting. Fill my Compact to 265b only on days I take it hunting because it gives me exactly 2 mags. There are marketing trends and things that get guys excited in this hobby. A couple years ago it was “Power Plenums”. Everyone had to have one, didn’t matter what kind of gun you had. Screwing them on Dreamlines, Wildcats, Taipans and even Avengers. Now it’s the 300b fill craze. Maybe that’s why FX left that door open. Buy the M3 and down the road we will sell you the stuff to make you a big 300b filler guy. Hence the manual.