𖦏 Huben GK1 Pistol: .22cal -vs.- .25cal: for Hollow Point Expansion

🔘 Huben GK1 Pistol 🔘

🔸.22cal vs. .25cal🔸

Hollow Point Expansion

for Close and Mid Range Pesting


The GK1 pistol is a fascinating piece of equipment, in that such a small thing has so much power, and is semi-auto!

I don't have the funds, but I have to have a goal to save up, so.... —
to help me in my decision process which caliber, I did a little ballistic comparison of

.22cal vs. .25cal —​

so see which caliber would give me
expanding hollow point performance
for close to mid range pesting

(rats, squirrels, pigeons, etc.).


■ The most important condition for hollow points to expand on impact is their impact velocity (IV).
Assuming the lead is reasonably soft (below the CPHP hardness), HP usually will expand well at 800fps impact velocity (IV).
At 750fps IV many still do expand some.
At 700fps IV some still do expand some.
Below that all bets are off (until I have ran more terminal ballistic test 😊).


Here are the impact velocity results ChairGun spit out for me:


Huben GK1.   .22cal vs. .25cal.  Impact Velocity, with Labels.jpg



🟠 Discussion of the results:
● At 10 yard ratting range
the .22cal Polymag clearly produces a much higher impact velocity (850fps), virtually guaranteeing hollow point expansion.
The others all start out below 800, though because of their higher BC they don't loose as much velocity on their way out to 10y, so they all hit the rats between 750 to 780fps. I would definitely expect HP expansion with the .25 Polymag.

● At 25 yard mid range pesting the picture changes. Now the .22cal Polymag (due to its low BC) has shed velocity much quicker than both caliber slugs. These three now all impact with nearly the same IV of 750 to 770fps. ➔ HP expansion is still likely, with the .25cal probably expanding more due to its larger impact surface.
The .25 Polymag is down to 700 IV, and HP expansion will be less and/or less likely.

🟠 Preliminary Conclusion
(a) For close range ratting
the .22cal seems to be the better choice, considering that it would give significantly more shots per fill.

(b) For mid range pesting the .22 pellet and slug are about even with the .25 slug. Which would give an edge to the .25 slug as it will have more impact energy.
However, if the shots are angled upwards (birds in trees), I could't use slugs — due to their high BC they would fly far and hit much harder than a low BC pellet!

(c) Another consideration are the ages-ago announced and still not delivered FX SLULLETS (or FX PELLUGS).
From the photos they are slugs, comparatively light, and with a huge hollow point. If they ever arrive at production status, these will be very light slugs that are highly expanding, and that will have a much higher impact velocity in .22cal than in .25cal, resulting in more HP expansion.
So, again, .22cal seems to be better for this scenario.

(d) The much higher shotcount of the .22 is also an important consideration — as ratting will quickly empty the magazine — and the tiny air reservoir!



🟠 QUESTIONS
I have the same power numbers that you all have from the different videos and sales pages.
.22cal: they say 4-33FPE
.25cal: they say 4-38FPE

❓Does that seem a rather small difference between the two calibers, only 5FPE more when going up to .25cal?
❓Or is the 33FPE for .22cal a bit optimistic (since their shot count example used 23FPE)?

It seems like the GK1 pistol in .22cal has typical PCP rifle power.
But in .25cal is is rather underpowered in comparison to PCP rifles.
❓Is this fair to say?

Matthias




● Projectiles and their color coding:
Red: .22cal Polymag | 30FPE | 0.021BC
Green: .22cal Hybrid | 30FPE | 0.060BC
Blue: .25cal Polymag | 36FPE | 0.028BC
Purple: .25cal Hybrid | 36FPE | 0.070BC
(These are conservative BC numbers.)
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure your quest has value in so much as all air guns are velocity limited in relation to PBs. I think the real issue is energy delivered to the target. In this respect, if the projectile stops on the target, all the projectile's energy would be delivered. The additional energy advantage of a hollow point only occurs when it prevents target pass through, which only occurs with air guns on relatively small targets. In that case the damage would be very lethal anyway. So, is the real question not about total energy of the projectile? I think it is and if the speed is limited as it is in air guns, the only way to increase energy is with an increase in the mass of the projectile. In that case, larger calibers rein supreme.
 
It also appears you think pesting is the best application of the GK1's attributes. When pesting excessive power is damaging in confined spaces and inside structures. Usually the chances to use a rapid second shot are slim, if not non-existent. Lastly, accuracy and rapid target acquisition is more important than maximum power. In that stated scenario, a short barreled .177 rifle is a much better choice.
 
This is probably one of the only luxury/niche priced airguns to really tempt me other than a taipan.

The question you are trying to answer in terms of the best caliber for the mechanism is one I have been wondering about… seems like more than enough for .22 but a litte underpowered for .25

I thought i read that that 25 caliber was supposed to go up to much higher powers like 60+ fpe or something. If it’s true, that there is only five FPE difference between the two, I’m not sure what the appeal of the .25 ca would be.
 
Kelly has the specs for the .25 posted on his website. They look pretty decent. Mid-range should be around 41 FPE shooting a 33 grain pellet:


I'm going for one in .25 mainly because there are not a lot of PCP pistols in that caliber, other than the Hatsan Jet, and this should be much nicer! I put it in more the category of my Ataman AP-16, and it is .22, so a GK1 in .25 should be a nice compliment to the AP-16.
 
I went with the .22. I have had a couple slow 25 Cals rifles & I never could love them. Plus, the .22 should give you more shots per fill.
Shots per fill are related to power not caliber.

..........the .25 pistol can be tuned to 60 FPE and that is more then a hell of a lot of rifles out there.
 
I think the real issue is energy delivered to the target.

Yes, energy is an important part of the equation to determine killing power. 👍🏼

However, what actually kills is not energy (though it's a necessary component). What kills is a permanent HOLE in the quarry — nothing else. 😊
• Only crushed tissue kills, not “energy dumped,” nor a “temporary wound cavity,” nor “hydrostatic shock.”

• For the HOLE to kill – it must be in the right place in the quarry: brain/spine or heart/lungs or arteries/veins (to cause hemorrhaging).

• The projectiles that make a Better HOLE in the quarry are –– larger, faster, bulldozer-nose, expanding projectiles.

➠ I wrote an article about that: Quarry: What kills’em dead – the Mechanics of Killing, part 1 of a series of 5 articles, here:

https://www.airgunnation.com/topic/💀-quarry-what-killsem-dead-the-mechanics-of-killing/


Cheers, 😊
Matthias
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMTman
Accuracy and rapid target acquisition is more important than maximum power. In that stated scenario, a short barreled .177 rifle is a much better choice.


You are probably right!! 😄

And you made me realize: I'm not looking for the best overall tool to kill pest animals.

➠ I'm just looking for a new tool to go pesting!! 🤷‍♂️

Because the best overall tool to kill rats would probably be a cat, or poison, or a mass-trap as shown by the geniuses on the tube. 😉
Certainly not a tool costing 100 times more than a bag of poison. And the animal shelter will only too gladly hand me one of their rat killers for free...



➠ So, I guess, I want a PCP pistol. — Now I need to decide within that parameter which model, caliber, and power setting would be the best overall tool to kill rats....

You got me! 👍🏼

Matthias
 
Kelly has the specs for the .25 posted on his website. Mid-range should be around 41 FPE shooting a 33 grain pellet:



Yeah, I started with those specs.
But I did not want to accept the large variation in muzzle velocity — nor can I fill my guns to 350bar.
I'm estimating a shotcount of
19 shots,
from 300 to 150 bar,
with MV of 718–741–709fps (32fps extreme spread),
with ME of 38.0 to 41.5FPE,
with an extra heavy pellet, the JSB 33.95gr dome.

Then I reduce that "38 to 41.5FPE power" further, because my Polymag pellet will only weigh 26gr, and I expect a significant power difference with such a large weight difference.

So, that's how I arrive at an estimated 36FPE ME for my personal shooting scenario.
(If all you're after is one full power shot to get your pig, or whatever you're hunting, then 60FPE might not be so unrealistic, especially if the massive shot noise is no factor for you.)

Matthias 😊
 
I used to make my own large meplat pellets by using the internal piece of either hard leather or plastic out of a leather punch and glue it in the hollowpoint of an H&N Crow Magnum.

Thanks, Manny.

Yeah, for us close-range pesters there is really a market for wadcutters...:
(1) Heavy wadcutters that don't require detuning today's PCPs with their much higher ME.
(2) Larger caliber wadcutters to put even more smack on the pack.


For no. (1) for .22cal I found these 17 grain wadcutters from Air Boss, a sub-brand of Apolo. I still need to do some testing with them, but they seem better than the featherweights that all the other manufacturers are selling.

Matthias


2128653851.png





1715211352.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMTman
Just my opinion, but you will see more .25 cal Huben Pistols for resale than you will the .22s. The .25 will be great if you want to crank it way up for hunting something bigger than a tree squirrel, & do not need lots of shots per fill. You will not get as many shots per fill in the .25 unless you want to live with loopy trajectory. Remember the info on shots per fill are with 5000 psi fill. How many folks are going to be doing that? I will stick with the .22 in the Huben Pistol.