- Apr 25, 2021
- 3,915
- 5,708
- 83
Wow somebody needs a hugIsn't this already a common approach to some degree? Most all you tubers basically do this. Worthy discussion nonetheless with the baby monitor.
-Matt
ThomasT
Upvote 0
Wow somebody needs a hugIsn't this already a common approach to some degree? Most all you tubers basically do this. Worthy discussion nonetheless with the baby monitor.
-Matt
Wow somebody needs a hug
ThomasT
@Stubbers Pistol shooting with iron sights for me presents this challenge. Binoculars are an easy solution, but the breaking of my grip and such sucks after each shot.I just turn up my scope mag to where needed, idk how some of you guys shoot with red dots and sub 10x magnification, I personally don't enjoy not seeing the exact POA in detail as I shoot.
-Matt
Thank you for reminding me how useful and affordable baby cams are
Careful guys. You might not want your wife to see this. Might give her ideas.Hello everyone,
Shooting paper targets with Iron Sights and Red Dot Scope, I cannot see the pellet holes when the target is 15-feet or at a further distance. I have been using a large Spotting Scope but it is always in the way and not very easy to use, ( photo #1 ).
Last week I ordered an inexpensive baby camera with a monitor, ( $27.00 ). I made a stable wood base for the Camera so that it could be set up just about anywhere near a target. The monitor has a built in battery which allows it to be used remotely, so I can set it right next to my Pistol for easy viewing. I now I can see each POI as I shoot and make any adjustments in my hold position as required.
ThomasT
View attachment 510641View attachment 510642View attachment 510643View attachment 510644
@KWK It took a second for men to get this comment. That's funny. I have a cousin that this happened to. Her story is hilarious. Back to the topic at hand. 20 year old baby camera monitors will probably make your kid look pixelated like Qbert or one of the Super Mario Bros. Maybe you can get away with using a 1.3 megapixel camera for a target cam, I don't know. I just remember those cameras producing blocky looking photos.Careful guys. You might not want your wife to see this. Might give her ideas.
My wife had our youngest son at 47.
Our first 2 sons are awesome, and the 3rd is a charm. But I almost fell over when she told me she's expecting about 20 years ago
Yeah both of those are going to require a Wifi connection to your router (which might not be available depending on where you're shooting.) You want something that connects point to point that doesn't require Wifi, like:Any links to a good cheap combo that does what OP's does?
The best thing I found personally was this.
Just under 70$ for the combo.
-Matt