Why don't they make a break barrel with two pistons

Would it be cool (explain why or why not)

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
I mean like a normal break barrel. But it compresses 2 pistons instead of 1. I don't know what ratchet cocking cycle is 💀
A retchet cycle is where the pistons only cock (say) 1/3 of the whole distance , so three breaks of the barrel , would be the idea .
And yes a Whiscombe 80 had a two or three stroke cocking lever .
 
A retchet cycle is where the pistons only cock (say) 1/3 of the whole distance , so three breaks of the barrel , would be the idea .
And yes a Whiscombe 80 had a two or three stroke cocking lever .
Why dont we just make some electrical thing that cocks it for you? Bro that would be awesome. I don't understand why companies are sticking to the old boring manual stuff!!!!!!
 
There were also the Park RH91 & RH93 underlever opposed-piston design using a bicycle chain.
For electric cocking, see the Browning Airstar 200.
None of these were trying to make significantly higher power output, which obviously would require similarly higher energy input, whether by muscle or battery.

Don R.
 
so this thread is a bit confusing
the Giss System has been done and done well everyone that own a series 60 rifle will tell you that but only one piston made power the other was for recoil compensation
now two pistons making power and moving in opposite direction would be interesting but near impossible
now a racket or gear design cocking system has been done in the Cometa Indian the easiest spring pistol to cock on the market