all in.... longer barrel, 5 shot mag and the stock for 1200... yea I can see taht.... but I doubt itI would like to put my guess in at three times that!
No insult implied or intended @Archdesigner03Such an overly engineered gun, weird loading and cocking, and even the way to put on the carbine is weird where you have to twist the lower portion stock.
Fx under $400. Not likely. I’ll be shocked if it’s less than $800FX. Well, if they can bring it in under (at) $400 might be fun to tinker with. Actual barrel or soda straw? Naturally if it is made for the Halo ammo, not my cup of tea.
Did like the FX (of old?) Ranchero.
John
It's got a lot of parts.I wonder if it has less than 600 0 rings,
It's got a lot of parts.
Definetely looks like it unfortunately. I try my best to stick with the K.I.S.S. Rule. Im going to wait for peoples reviews on it, field test videos etc.It's got a lot of parts.
Time will tell for sure. Even a standard m9 is a pain to clean and keep running to many parts. But theres also the forgotten H&K p9 overly designed but runs like a swiss watch so hopefully it goes the right way. My apologies I know those are firearms its just what popped to mind.No insult implied or intended @Archdesigner03
You call it weird; I think of it as innovative
just my new sense
Edward
Looks like it's supposed to be pretty well under 1k if the rumors are true. They need something more accessible that showcases fx machining quality and performance to a wider buyer range. I'm buying one, but not if it's 1k. They've got enough of my money for a while.My wallet is shivering...
It's not that bad. My impact scared me at first but once you understand the system it's not nearly as scarry as putting orings on the valve and guage block into an mrod or crosman product with Insufficiently deburred thru holes on the main tube. First mrod rebuild was 3 kits till i got out a rotoburr and chamfered everything on the tube.I wonder if it has less than 600 0 rings,