RTI RTI Mora .25 caliber sniper - a mini-review

The RTI Mora April19th2025
A mini review by Joe Polanco


A couple of folks have asked me about the Mora, my likes, dislikes and general opinion of the gun overall. So, very quickly, without any detailed explanations of gun and/or it's design (this has been done at nauseam) lets jump directly to its functionality and it's pros and cons .

Is the RTI Mora perfect? Unequivocally no, of course not. In virtually anything, there always exist areas that can be improved. In the case of the Mora however,I've found very little that I would change.

Obviously,from the results I've posted and those readily found on other forums by various other shooters, the Mora's performance is, at least IME, as good as it gets given today's air gun technologies. The Mora platform is a precise, simple to work on platform which delivers supreme accuracy. The Mora is a well balanced and reasonably quiet machine whose overall fit and finish befits its high end price tag. The Mora,although capable of power ratings over 200 ft/lbs, sips rather than guzzles air and comes in a wide variety of configurations. When I judge PCPs on their "out of the box" performance, condition and quality, I do so using a rating scale from1 to 10, where 1 represents “avoid at all cost” and 10 equals “manna from heaven”. I give the Mora an overall rating of 9. Let me subtext this by saying that I've never given any gun a 10 and serious doubt that I, or any of you, will live long enough to ever experience a gun rated 10, one that emerges PERFECT out of the box.

So, what is there about the Mora not to like? What exactly are it's imperfections? For me, there are only two, very niggly points, I can think to criticize. The first is that I do not care for bottle guard (m-lok cage accessory). By comparison to the rest of the gun, this item is somewhat flimsy. The cage accessorys lack of heft is very noticeable when using it as a bi-pod mount. When used for this purpose, the slightest tap sends the entire gun vibrating like a tuning fork. Furthermore the cage/guard lacks any attachment formats other than m-lok. For those needing to ad an Arca or Picatinny accessory, you're going to need an adapter. Lastly the cage/guard unit attaches at a single point of contact on and below the trigger guard. This single point of contact further adds to the guns instability when using it as a bi-pod mounting point. However, since this an accessory and not a standard item, for me, it doesn't reflect poorly on gun in any way.

The only other "meh" I've found involves the cheek riser. The riser itself, is perfectly fine. However, the slots through which the attachment bolts pass are too short to permit the riser to be lowered sufficiently to allow me to use low or medium profile scope rings. Again, for me this is a nonissue. I simply removed the cheek riser altogether. However this issue too can be easily remedied with the use of a Dremel tool and a grinding bit to extend the slots. Neither of these “faults” really have anything to do with the gun itself and both are easily and inexpensively remedied.

All in all, I find the Mora to be a truly revolutionary product which I'm proud and confident to recommend to anyone looking for “the best their money can buy”.

My RTI Mora 25 cal sniper config.jpg
 
Last edited:
The RTI Mora April19th2025
A mini review by Joe Polanco


A couple of folks have asked me about the Mora,my likes, dislikes and general opinion of the gun overall. So, veryquickly, without detailed explanations of gun and/or it's design(this has been done at nauseam) lets jump directly to functionalityand it's pros and cons .

Is the RTI Mora perfect?Unequivocally no, of course not. In virtually anything, there always exist areas that can be improved. In the case of the Mora however,I've found very little that I would change.

Obviously,from the results I've posted and those readily found on other forums by various other shooters, the Mora's performance is, at least IME, as good as it gets given today's air gun technologies. The Mora platform is a precise, simple to work on platform which delivers supreme accuracy, a well balanced and reasonably quiet machine whose overall fit and finish is befits it high end price tag. The Mora,although capable of power ratings over 200 ft/lbs, sips rather than guzzles air and comes in a wide variety of configurations. When I judge PCPs on their "out of the box"performance, condition and quality, I do so using a rating scale from1 to 10, where 1 represents “avoid at all cost” and10 equals “manna from heaven”. I give the Mora an overall rating of 9. Let me subtext this by saying that I've never given any gun a 10 and serious doubt that I, or any of you, will live long enough to ever experience a gun rated 10, one that emerges PERFECT out of the box.

So, what is there about the Mora not to like? What exactly are it's imperfections? For me, there are only two, very niggly points, I can think to criticize.The first is that I do not care for bottle guard (m-lok cage accessory). By comparison to the rest of the gun, this item is somewhat flimsy. It's lack of heft is very noticeable when using it as a bi-pod mount where the slightest tap sends the entire gun vibrating like a tuning fork. Furthermore cage/guard lacks any attachment formats other than m-lok. For those needing to ad and Arca or Picatinny accessory, you're going to need an adapter. Lastly the unit attaches at a single point of contact on and below the trigger guard. This single point of contact further adds to the guns instability when using it as a bi-pod mounting point. However, since this an accessory and not a standard item, for me, it doesn't reflect poorly on gun in any way.

The only other "meh"I've found involves the cheek riser. The riser itself, is perfectly fine. However, the slots through which the attachment bolts pass are too short to permit the riser to be lowered sufficiently to allow me to use low or medium profile scope rings. Again, for me this is a nonissue. I simply removed the cheek riser altogether although thisissue can be easily remedied with the use of a Dremel tool and a grinding bit. Neither of these “faults” really have anything to do with the gun itself and both are easily and inexpensively remedied.

All in all, I find the Mora to be a truly revolutionary product which I'm proud and confident to recommend to anyone looking for “the best money can buy”.

View attachment 556552
Nice quick review Joe. I was going to ask which you like better, the Mora or the Skout, but we’ll see soon enough which gun you shoot at RMAC. See you there…
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoePolanco
Hi Mike:

As it stands right now, either gun is more than capable of winning it all. I will continue shooting both weekly at my local range and as well at the monthly regional events we have here in Ohio. Hopefully I will be able to make a decision on which to shoot for the big money from those results.

Sadly, I won't be making it to RMAC this year. I made three different calls to UA to insure that the three of us from tABC would get early registration since this year, we're not shooting for Skout. Unfortunately, no one from UA returned my calls and as a result I've had to opt out. Jerry, being somewhat more enthusiastic than I, did manage to contact Justin. Justin told Jerry that he would be placed at the top of the waiting list. That's a nice gesture, but not one I'm willing to risk thousands of dollars in expenses on, so I'll be giving it a pass this year. However, I'll be at PAC, EBR, and TBAC (if that one actually happens, it's still a bit up in the air) as we have industry standing and early reservation with all three. I'm sure if anyone from UA had returned my call, they'd have extended that to us as well. In the past we've always been sponsored so we've never needed it. So, although I'll miss my chance at RMAC this year, I fully intend to make my presence felt everywhere else and hope to see you there... LoL

Cheers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Centercut
Hi Mike:

As it stands right now, either gun is more than capable of winning it all. I will continue shooting both weekly at my local range and as well at the monthly regional events we have here in Ohio. Hopefully I will be able to make a decision on which to shoot for the big money from those results.

Sadly, I won't be making it to RMAC this year. I made three different calls to UA to insure that the three of us from tABC would get early registration since this year, we're not shooting for Skout. Unfortunately, no one from UA returned my calls and as a result I've had to opt out. Jerry, being somewhat more enthusiastic than I, did manage to contact Justin. Justin told Jerry that he would be placed at the top of the waiting list. That's a nice gesture, but not one I'm willing to risk thousands of dollars in expenses on, so I'll be giving it a pass this year. However, I'll be at PAC, EBR, and TBAC (if that one actually happens, it's still a bit up in the air) as we have industry standing and early reservation with all three. I'm sure if anyone from UA had returned my call, they'd have extended that to us as well. In the past we've always been sponsored so we've never needed it. So, although I'll miss my chance at RMAC this year, I fully intend to make my presence felt everywhere else and hope to see you there... LoL

Cheers
Thanks Joe. I’d like to shoot PAC, but AAFTA doesn’t really give me a woody, and the Speed could end up being 20 seconds of shooting. Not interested in traveling that far (from San Diego) just to shoot 100Y BR. The NAC would be more my style, but it is no more. See you at EBR!