220 volt vs 115 volt HPA Compressor

Given the Pros & Cons of each... which are you choosing?


  • Total voters
    25
It's God's gas :LOL:

Seriously though @Michael, had I chosen electric it would've been a 220, regardless of brand.
I'm kinda leaning towards keeping the 220v as well. But I am curious what other members think.

Some of the advantages of the 115v compressor are:
  • $2500 compared to $3500
  • Lighter weight
  • Significantly less noise
  • Low power consumption (not sure how to quantify that)
  • Standard 110v receptacle (likely the greatest factor)
 
I'm no electrician but when purchasing my Alkin, a salesman at Utah Air told me to go with 220 because it wouldn't have to work as hard, fill faster, and require less amps. Not sure if that was valid advice but I went with it.
i thought about 115 also ,but Nuvair salesman Mitch told me the same thing =220 works faster & easier, & i already have 220 , so that's what i ordered.
 
I like how fast the 220v are and it seems the more robust and reliable compressors come in 220v. So that's my vote.

Now, my preference would be for a solid reliable long lasting compressor that can feed of a single 110/120v 15A circuit without pushing it to the threshold of tripping a breaker if you turn on a light bulb (yes this happened with my YH). I am not concerned if my fill takes 10 minutes or 30 minutes if it is reliable.

Regarding power consumption - not sure if that is something one can quantify or use as a comparison. 220v fills using more power for less time or 110v fills using less power for more time. I think it would balance out on the electric meter at the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael
I'm kinda leaning towards keeping the 220v as well. But I am curious what other members think.

Some of the advantages of the 115v compressor are:
  • $2500 compared to $3500
  • Lighter weight
  • Significantly less noise
  • Low power consumption (not sure how to quantify that)
  • Standard 110v receptacle (likely the greatest factor)
Michael , you should buy some lotto tickets, as you are really lucky to have won 2 Air compressors, & i am guessing the big box was the newest compressor ?
 
The currently advertised 110v Daystate compressor lists it as 4 stage which indicates that it too has the MCH6 pump, though some of the earlier 110v units used a MCH3 pump (3 stage). Did you visually check to see which pump your 110v compressor has?

There is no real difference in price between a 110v motor and a 220v motor. It’s the additional add ons (auto stop/start, auto drain) that raise the cost/price. Right now, you can get a 220v Coltri MCH6 for $2500 without the auto features. And the Coltri version has the complete filter system. In my opinion, the slower 110v could benefit more from the auto stop. The 220v fills so fast that I can monitor it while it fills so no real need for the auto stop.

 
So coming from an electricians background, the 220v is always going to be more efficient than the 115v if using the same pump assembly. 220v motors are more efficient to begin with, and then it’s running for less time, so the amount of electricity used is going to be less.
My thoughts as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: madeintheuk
Michael , you should buy some lotto tickets, as you are really lucky to have won 2 Air compressors, & i am guessing the big box was the newest compressor ?
In all fairness the wins were 8 years apart 😜

Yes the big box from the teaser vid was the newest 115v unit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAMJET66
The currently advertised 110v Daystate compressor lists it as 4 stage which indicates that it too has the MCH6 pump, though some of the earlier 110v units used a MCH3 pump (3 stage). Did you visually check to see which pump your 110v compressor has?

There is no real difference in price between a 110v motor and a 220v motor. It’s the additional add ons (auto stop/start, auto drain) that raise the cost/price. Right now, you can get a 220v Coltri MCH6 for $2500 without the auto features. And the Coltri version has the complete filter system. In my opinion, the slower 110v could benefit more from the auto stop. The 220v fills so fast that I can monitor it while it fills so no real need for the auto stop.

I was told this compressor is the latest 4 stage unit.

01FC05E1-9B51-41D8-AE8C-3005167009FB.jpeg
9F3FB5D4-712E-44A7-972F-F11DE1AA0B4A.jpeg
 
I like how fast the 220v are and it seems the more robust and reliable compressors come in 220v. So that's my vote.

Now, my preference would be for a solid reliable long lasting compressor that can feed of a single 110/120v 15A circuit without pushing it to the threshold of tripping a breaker if you turn on a light bulb (yes this happened with my YH). I am not concerned if my fill takes 10 minutes or 30 minutes if it is reliable.

Regarding power consumption - not sure if that is something one can quantify or use as a comparison. 220v fills using more power for less time or 110v fills using less power for more time. I think it would balance out on the electric meter at the end.
Perhaps “low power consumption” refers to the amount of electricity required.
 
Since I just purchased the MCH 6 in the 220v version, I'm going to say 220v.
For me it was a no brainer. 220v motors are going to work less, and be more efficient. Which equates to better life. That's why you don't see a lot of 110v tools used for heavy-duty in the 120v range.

And the added benefit, is it fills quicker.
 
I would look at the CFM output on each. I'm pretty sure the 220 beats the 110. Now if they both have the same output, The 110 is gonna be harder to start the compressor. It will also be harder on the motor once you get closer to the pressure you need . If you get the 110 unit you will basically only be able to use the power for that compressor only on that circuit and it still may pop the breaker. The big convenience is your house has plenty of 110 outlets. You just gotta make sure that everything else is shut off in that same leg when you're using the compressor. And that may not be enough if you have a low current breaker for that leg. I have a bauer compressor that runs off of 110. It has a lower output than the 220 version but it was made for the 110 . If I had a Choice I would have gotten the 220 version. Less chance of the motor running hot, 220 is easier on the motor as well. Its like a 110 vs a 220 shop compressor. The 110 will labor more than the 220. And i do not believe the 110 is any cheaper to run. As a matter of fact i think it cost more because it is more work for the compressor. I'm sorry I think I'm rambling. 🤪

Allen
 
Bottom line is watts used amps x volts = watts and then how long it runs = used watt

Im thinking it depends on the person's situation. Do they have access to 220? Or just 110? I only have 110 readily available; but I use a hand pump🤷‍♂️😅Id like one of those portable compressors though. Saw some you hook up to your vehicle; genius 🤪🤙