Hi all,
I've been developing a 22mm tune on my HW97, .177 rifle. The piston is skirtless, 130g with tophat, o-ring sealing and on a TX200 mk3 spring and latch rod.
I'm quite happy with it but recently a leaky compression tube has had me questioning things and I thought it would be interesting to get some more thoughts on a solution.
Initially the rifle was set up to shoot 8.44 exacts @ 760fps, I had issues with the comp tube leaking originally. I think I had a void in the compression tube sleeve, I fixed this by sealing the end with retaining compound.
Eventually after shooting a tin of pellets through it again I thought "bugger me, this rifle is shooting really well". The recoil was pleasant, the gun was very easy to shoot, I couldn't really feel any hold sensitivity and no loss of sight picture on recoil. Very happy moment after a couple of weeks of amateur hour engineering in my garage.
However when I chrono'd the gun I found it was only shooting at 700fps, I suspected the leak was back and I was right. Upon getting home and re-sealing the compression tube the gun was doing 760fps again.
I spent a couple of hours shooting the gun today and it was not as nice. It feels like I'm getting piston bounce, the sight image is easily lost and is much more difficult to shoot compared to before.
To me this is strange as nothing else changed, it's the same spring, piston, o-ring, pre-load... Everything. The total energy released when I fire cannot change but the feel of the rifle did.
I will be making another compression tube with a new sleeve, one that will not leak. But I am hesitant to do this until I have this one shooting well...
With a leaking compression tube I am thinking that the pressure build up in the compression tube will be less, therefore this reduced pressure will result in less piston bounce.
Can I achieve the reduced piston bounce by opening up the transfer port? Currently I think the transfer port is around 3.2mm. I'm thinking 3.6 might be worth a try...
I think I'm going to do this anyway and I can always turn up a brass tube to reduce it again if I go too far but I'm just wanting to bounce ideas off other people before I have a go later.
Cheers
I've been developing a 22mm tune on my HW97, .177 rifle. The piston is skirtless, 130g with tophat, o-ring sealing and on a TX200 mk3 spring and latch rod.
I'm quite happy with it but recently a leaky compression tube has had me questioning things and I thought it would be interesting to get some more thoughts on a solution.
Initially the rifle was set up to shoot 8.44 exacts @ 760fps, I had issues with the comp tube leaking originally. I think I had a void in the compression tube sleeve, I fixed this by sealing the end with retaining compound.
Eventually after shooting a tin of pellets through it again I thought "bugger me, this rifle is shooting really well". The recoil was pleasant, the gun was very easy to shoot, I couldn't really feel any hold sensitivity and no loss of sight picture on recoil. Very happy moment after a couple of weeks of amateur hour engineering in my garage.
However when I chrono'd the gun I found it was only shooting at 700fps, I suspected the leak was back and I was right. Upon getting home and re-sealing the compression tube the gun was doing 760fps again.
I spent a couple of hours shooting the gun today and it was not as nice. It feels like I'm getting piston bounce, the sight image is easily lost and is much more difficult to shoot compared to before.
To me this is strange as nothing else changed, it's the same spring, piston, o-ring, pre-load... Everything. The total energy released when I fire cannot change but the feel of the rifle did.
I will be making another compression tube with a new sleeve, one that will not leak. But I am hesitant to do this until I have this one shooting well...
With a leaking compression tube I am thinking that the pressure build up in the compression tube will be less, therefore this reduced pressure will result in less piston bounce.
Can I achieve the reduced piston bounce by opening up the transfer port? Currently I think the transfer port is around 3.2mm. I'm thinking 3.6 might be worth a try...
I think I'm going to do this anyway and I can always turn up a brass tube to reduce it again if I go too far but I'm just wanting to bounce ideas off other people before I have a go later.
Cheers