AEAC - FX Impact M3 Tuning Guide (interesting pre-video learning shared here)

"I noticed on your last couple tunes that you have your wheel or PA set on #16. Did you abandon the happy spot, mid wheel, that you originally got excited about?"

My guess might be that he is shooting 25.39gr pellets now, requiring more air to push them?
You can still set the wheel on 8 and micro your way up to 4.5, 5 or whatever you want.
 
Steve I always thought the Big Wheel with 1-16 was called the Macro Wheel and the slide wheel was called the Micro Wheel and also the Valve adjustments were described by the lines on the stem (i.e. my valve is turned out to line 4 or line 3 1/2)
This is correct. The little wheel is the micro the big wheel is the macro and both togeather is the QTS (Quick tune System). It’s very hard to follow when you use the wrong terminology

0EB78298-FA6A-4D35-BAFB-F65079154E9B.jpeg
 
I've begun probing the FX Impact M3 for learning nuggets out ahead of my upcoming YouTube M3 tuning guides. The learning I discover, I'll share here as I go, as a resource for new tuners seeking information on how to tune the M3. Experienced tuners, please feel free to chime in and share your victories too. Tuning is as much an art as it is a science. There are many good tuners out there and many good ways to go about it.

Right out of the gate, I sought an easier approach to tuning the M3. One which would streamline my time in the chair and reduce pellet consumption along the way. My previously published YouTube tuning guides on the Maverick, Dreamline, Crown Continuum, Avenger, Avenger Pup, Redwolf, and Atomic taught me that perfect tune searching can be taxing on both the soul & pocketbook, so coming up with an "easier way" for this new guide has been a priority. Side note: Going forward, AEAC Tuning Guides will be published on the main channel, AEAC Home, and no longer on AEAC Vlog.

Right out of the gate, I ran a baseline chart for the M3 Compact (300cc bottle & 500mm liner) to see how Sweden had set it up. The takeaways for me are that Sweden likes a 90 bar reg for good all-around power & efficiency with an 18gr out of this configuration. That's important to note as we go forward and explore the lower limits of the aft reg on the M3, and lighter ammo. From the below, it's also clear that they like the gun set up with the Power Adjuster (PA) on 16, presumably because this is what the majority of their customers want. Personally, I've always sought to tune the FX's to more of a "middle point" on the wheel. Below is my M3's baseline run as it came out of the box.

View attachment 318604

View attachment 318658

After running a base line, I was curious about the relationship between the PA wheel and the QTS micro adjuster, as well as how low I could get reg 2 to run reliably. So, I came up with the below. It's a simple 80 shot evaluation of the above described and to my surprise, it revealed an interesting anomaly. If you'd like to run the test on your M3, simply take 5 shots at each PA setting (16 down to 1) while keeping the QTS reset to #3 with each new PA setting. Keep the Valve Adjuster (VA) on max-open for the run. It's also good when exploring the lower limits of a reg to keep your bottle pressure in a reasonable window like 225-150 bar or so. I've found that sometimes, regs get goofy near their lower limits (although not with this one) and can produce unreliable results when the pressure on them is at the two extremes. It's also good when running low reg pressure to allow the system a few seconds to take a breath in between shots. I like 5-10 seconds. Once done with your test, enhance your chart's magnification to around 50 fps total, so that you can see what's going on. Here's what I got:

View attachment 318624

View attachment 318659

The above test (I'm calling the Power Adjuster Flat Spot Search Tool) revealed an enhanced performance zone between the PA settings of 8-10 when running a 70 bar reg and while shooting a 16gr. Velocity clearly ran much tighter for me in this 15-shot zone. I posted the initial results here on AGN in another post (admittedly with overenthusiasm and without a full understanding) and ruffled some member-feathers. The outrage encouraged me to slow down, consult with Sweden about the find, and take a more in depth look at this phenomenon. Sweden had the below to say when I shared the above with them... it was a phone conversation, some of which I'll quote and some of which I'll paraphrase.

These test results are "intriguing & exciting," and that you may have "discovered a hack that could be quite useful in locating a mechanical sweet spot in a gun's overall system-mechanics... a sweet spot where PW & QTS interact with a bit less resistance, hence offer enhanced performance." Sweden theorized that by running this test, one could easily locate & identify this theoretical system sweet spot, and perhaps build upon its usefulness. For now, they are calling the data "undeniable." After the holiday vacation, Sweden will run my "flat spot search tool" test in an effort to better understand it. I'll catch up with them afterwards and share what comes of it.

Moving forward from the find, I decided to exploit my discovered 70 bar, 16gr flat zone anomaly and run an entire chart at that PA #9 sweet spot. I was rewarded with the below which for tracking purposes at this point, I'm calling Eco Tune 1. Bearing in mind that I had performed NO other searching around for ideal settings other than having run my initial flat spot search tool, I kinda had an oh sh*t moment and thought to myself. "Dang, that's a very decent usable shot chart... and this flat spot search tool test could be a useful method for others to simplify M3 tuning."

View attachment 318633

Wanting to evolve Eco Tune 1 into something more field worthy, I slowly worked the Valve Adjuster in a 1/4 turn at a time, searching for further tightening of shot-to-shot velocity. This step trims any waste air, increases efficiency, and improves accuracy. As you do it, listen for the report to go from a "cough" to a "snick" or even a light "snick-ping." The change in sound means that you're "there" and probably in an improved area. The below Eco Tune 2 is what I took into the field with me last week to 50-yard film for the upcoming tuning guide... and the results were excellent, especially for a 16gr leaving at 850 fps and arriving 50 yards sway at 675-700 fps, in a 3-7 mph wind (multiple troll-strolls included) :). Note: the VA ultimately needed another 1/4 turn in to stabilize 50-yard accuracy, which super-validates the usefulness of this nifty device.

View attachment 318644

View attachment 318647

View attachment 318649

View attachment 318668

Having validated the above methodology on film, I set out to retest my flat spot search tool again, but this time with an 80 bar reg instead of 70. The 80 bar test revealed yet another clearly visible 15-shot flat zone. Again, I exploited this enhanced performance zone to quickly & efficiently come up with another good tune for the M3. I'm calling this latest discovery, Eco Tune 3, and its numbers suggest some serious system-harmony.

View attachment 318669

View attachment 318672

View attachment 318684

View attachment 318685

View attachment 318702

For me, this discovery and its apparent system-sweet-spot-hack has me quite encouraged. I'm very much enjoying the speed & simplicity of getting to the result, as well as field-validating the accuracy that came via the new approach. As soon as the rain clears, I'll fine tune Eco Tue 3 via the VA, then get back out there at 50 to film-validate it for the upcoming YouTube AEAC M3 tuning guides. Then, hop on the 18gr... then on to the max power extraction stuff.

As I come across these learning nuggets, I'll share them here on AGN and on AEAC Instagram, "hookedonair" first... out ahead of the video, so you guys don't have to wait.

Enjoy and happy tuning 😊
Steve
 
Hi Steve,

Can you please prepare your graphs with appropriate fps values in Y axis so that spikes or minor variations can be observed . All the graphs looks flat to me as values selected velocity ( fps ) are way beyond the achieved velocity (fps).

thanks for sharing your work.
Hi Reliable,

Thanks for the question.

I'm happy with a 200 fps spread on the axis and feel it's appropriate for getting general sense of count, and when & how the string comes off the reg (what's important to me).

If one wants the detail you seek (which is just as important to me if not more so), they simply need to look at the provided summary numbers in the bottom left-hand corner of the chart. Regardless of chosen axis resolution, those don't change and will tell you everything important. An SD of 4-5 = alligator teeth chart. An SD of 1-2 = flat line chart ☺️ .

Hope that helps,
Steve
 
I noticed on your last couple tunes that you have your wheel or PA set on #16. Did you abandon the happy spot, mid wheel, that you originally got excited about?

Hi Vetmx,

No, "abandon" isn't the word I'd use. I'd say that I discovered the hack, explored it, validated it, then moved on to a less distracting and more commonly used approach for the remainder of the guide... PA on 16 and work the regs & QTS.

Steve
 
  • Like
Reactions: .20calguy
"I noticed on your last couple tunes that you have your wheel or PA set on #16. Did you abandon the happy spot, mid wheel, that you originally got excited about?"

My guess might be that he is shooting 25.39gr pellets now, requiring more air to push them?
Thanks for the question Revoman.

No, same answer as above for Vetmx. I came across it, validated it out for a time, then moved on a more main-stream approach of; PA on 16 & work the regs & QTS from low to high... although I did see some Pros running mid-ship PA's last week at NAC which was cool.

The hack worked for me but seems to be confusing people, so while it will be part of my guide, it won't be at the heart of its teachings.

Hope that helps,
Steve
 
Steve,
I have a M3 Compact in .25cal. Would you happen to know if these settings would correlate with the .25cal?

Thanks,

Mike
Hi Mike,

The settings would be quite different between guns but the teachings & approach on how to achieve the tune you want would be the same. It'll be my goal to teach one "how" (regardless of gun) as well as to provide examples and validation.

Steve