Ya, the teeth don’t line up with zero marks. But I didn’t even pop the cap to return the marking after sighting in. Guess that shows I really don’t turn the knobs.
My only gripe is that we can only accurately use the reticle at 10X on a 27x scope. Granted for the quality of the glass even as a 10X fix scope it's actually pretty inexpensive and you can always zoom in to take a better look and zoom out to shoot.
If your holdover was 1 mil at 10x then it's 2 mils at 20x or 2.7 mils at 27x. Not really that hard to calculate. It's just like any other SFP scope.
actually you have it the other way around. This is the problem with high magnification on a SFP scope. Most scope has 6-8 mils on the reticle so that mean if you zoom to 20x you are only getting 3-4 Mils which isn’t enough even at 1000fps at 100 yards.
If you get the ELEMNT helix that has a clever design of true to scale reticle at 24x and that means @ 12x every Mil is 2 mils which is VERY usable! I really like the element helix! Very well thought out!
What are you smoking? Try it and see. And if you read the 2nd part of your post you actually agree with me. 6-8 mils (the distance on the reticle) at 10x is the same as 3-4mils at 20x. If your reticle stays the same size as you zoom, and your target gets twice as big, your holdover now also gets twice as big. This means you have to holdover TWICE as much. If you were holding over 1 mil, then you now have to hold over 2 mils.
Do you believe Strelok?
Here's a 80yd holdover at 10x - 9 mils
Now the same 80yds at 20x - is it 4.5 mils, as you say? Or 18 mils?
Upvote 0