Flashing the same firmware that is already on the device i just mentioned as a way to test if something proven to work would take to the device.
But i cant say i have seen a device ( camera ) going to " deny firmware update " or that is i have seen that CUZ some times people can load a wrong firmware that will render the system inoperable, but as i understand it your devise are working.
But in those cases the user would have to do bootloader and then firmware, or go VIA connection to the computer and a program like USB direct and then update using a .ELF file ( often systems based on the Ambarella brand SOC )
It is annoying when brands use firmwares with the same name, and so if you Dl them to your default folder in widows, the suffix (1) ASO will be added as there is already a file with that name in the Dl folder, so i have made it a rule to immediately move those filed to folders i have created for the specific camera i am testing.
But in the old days that have caught me out a few times, also after i learned this and thought it was good enough to just remember to edit the file name when put on memory card ready for update, but then the old idiot forget and firmware.bin (1) will not load due to the (1) suffix
Many brands will also not have a list of what have been fixed in this firmware version, even if you are a addict and tied in to the company to some degree you can easy miss stuff.
At least do this so we addicts / dedicated users can see what is going on, and maybe the issues we have personally reported is getting fixed.
But i cant say i have seen a device ( camera ) going to " deny firmware update " or that is i have seen that CUZ some times people can load a wrong firmware that will render the system inoperable, but as i understand it your devise are working.
But in those cases the user would have to do bootloader and then firmware, or go VIA connection to the computer and a program like USB direct and then update using a .ELF file ( often systems based on the Ambarella brand SOC )
It is annoying when brands use firmwares with the same name, and so if you Dl them to your default folder in widows, the suffix (1) ASO will be added as there is already a file with that name in the Dl folder, so i have made it a rule to immediately move those filed to folders i have created for the specific camera i am testing.
But in the old days that have caught me out a few times, also after i learned this and thought it was good enough to just remember to edit the file name when put on memory card ready for update, but then the old idiot forget and firmware.bin (1) will not load due to the (1) suffix
Many brands will also not have a list of what have been fixed in this firmware version, even if you are a addict and tied in to the company to some degree you can easy miss stuff.
At least do this so we addicts / dedicated users can see what is going on, and maybe the issues we have personally reported is getting fixed.
Upvote 0