Looks good. Like that. Mine is on the way finally. I ordered a 97 walnut .20 thumbhole to keep it company. CrowI got you.
View attachment 521997
Upvote 0
Looks good. Like that. Mine is on the way finally. I ordered a 97 walnut .20 thumbhole to keep it company. CrowI got you.
View attachment 521997
I agree the value is in the eye of the one spending the money. Like you like the 35E. And I see it as a worthless option for me. Where as the 95n is perfect for me.Value is in the eye of the wallet holder. I do find it high compared to the stainless, Walnut HW35E. Personally this wallet holder would buy the HW35E as I have been kicking myself since I sold mine. I have never missed my departed HW95 even a little. But that’s me and I know the 95s have an adoring following here.
The 95 is probably the prettiest springer in the line and looks even better in Nickle. I have an email from Weihrauch stating the the only regular production Nickle model is the 97 and that all others are special orders by distributors. So the 95N in walnut truly is a special gun and a more than worthwhile purchase.I agree the value is in the eye of the one spending the money. Like you like the 35E. And I see it as a worthless option for me. Where as the 95n is perfect for me.
Glad we have choices
2025 is also the 20th year anniversary of the HW95.The 95 is probably the prettiest springer in the line and looks even better in Nickle. I have an email from Weihrauch stating the the only regular production Nickle model is the 97 and that all others are special orders by distributors. So the 95N in walnut truly is a special gun and a more than worthwhile purchase.
View attachment 522325
I notice that the "stainless" has a bead blasted matte finish while the blue ones (mine at least) is highly polished. Are these really stainless steel or just nickel plated regular steel?How may HW95s you seen in stainless? With a walnut stock to boot
No idea what the finish actually is. Definitely not made from stainless steel. And I’m not claiming it is. I’m simply calling it, by how it is described in the sales adds.I notice that the "stainless" has a bead blasted matte finish while the blue ones (mine at least) is highly polished. Are these really stainless steel or just nickel plated regular steel?
No idea what the finish actually is. Definitely not made from stainless steel. And I’m not claiming it is. I’m simply calling it, by how it is described in the sales adds.
Check the picture
View attachment 522501
How’s this?Hi, now that I've seen the barrel leade (the rim looks plated as well, good), how does the muzzle area look like?
I'm asking because I intend to send one of my AG barrels to a known plater, and I'm curious if there is a distinct demarcation line between the plated and non-plated section(s).
I have plated parts but never a barrel, so I'm curious.
Thanks
So, how do you become a gold member, other than by starting your own private import operation like you have?Today gold members got a calendar. CrowView attachment 517784
I bet their close to the same value if they're both in the same caliber. I'm pretty dang impressed with the 35e in.22 cal.I agree the value is in the eye of the one spending the money. Like you like the 35E. And I see it as a worthless option for me. Where as the 95n is perfect for me.
Glad we have choices
I may have to get one. It’s sounding more and more enticingI bet their close to the same value if they're both in the same caliber. I'm pretty dang impressed with the 35e in.22 cal.
35e is a great gun . I have both cal. Eyeballed that stainless a million times, it looks so good. Almost last week but scored a 97 Walnut thumb hole .20 instead. Next time. Wished they came in .20 cal. CrowI bet their close to the same value if they're both in the same caliber. I'm pretty dang impressed with the 35e in.22 cal.
Nice! That’s a beauty!35e is a great gun . I have both cal. Eyeballed that stainless a million times, it looks so good. Almost last week but scored a 97 Walnut thumb hole .20 instead. Next time. Wished they came in .20 cal. Crow
The 35 in .22 is a great argument for a mildot scope. They don’t by any means lob pellets but will drop a dot or two at 50.Nice! That’s a beauty!
I’m kind of happy with the .22 for a bit of variety, but it doesn’t hang with the .20’s yet as far as I can tell.
Yes sir,The 35 in .22 is a great argument for a mildot scope. They don’t by any means lob pellets but will drop a dot or two at 50.
Yes, that's what I like about the FFP scopes in MOA (I like MOA over Mil), you can measure with a glance and make an adjustment.Yes sir,
The retical that I'm using is an MOA hash marked in first focal plane, so I can accuratly measure the distance of POImpact to POAim and make quick adjustments regardless of magnification. I also have the Element scope dope app, to calculate ranges and ballistics for the ammo types.
It's is a great moment in time for airgun plinkers!
View attachment 523894
Very nice but a bit busy for my old eyes. For me it goes more like that shot will need a dot and three quarter!Yes sir,
The retical that I'm using is an MOA hash marked in first focal plane, so I can accuratly measure the distance of POImpact to POAim and make quick adjustments regardless of magnification. I also have the Element scope dope app, to calculate ranges and ballistics for the ammo types.
It's is a great moment in time for airgun plinkers!
View attachment 523894