Correct. Reticle just as small. I’d have to use the illumination as a sort of red dot at low mag, and my eyes aren’t too bad!I wonder if the reticle is super thin on the 4x16 Arken ?
Upvote 0
Correct. Reticle just as small. I’d have to use the illumination as a sort of red dot at low mag, and my eyes aren’t too bad!I wonder if the reticle is super thin on the 4x16 Arken ?
I'd love to hear how it compares to the Midas Tac once you've had time to mess with the Arken a while.So finally got round to mounting the epl4 4-16 on my veteran standard 25. It replaced the sh4 4-16 I had on it before.
so far, the glass is on par with the sh4, and is clear edge to edge at max magnification. Light transfer is good, and turrets are super clicky.
it’s basically the same scope as the sh4, only substantially lighter and smaller, which helped with the vet being top heavy. I’m pleased with it so far.
only time will tell if it lives up to my Expectations. Going from my zthlon Midas tac to this, so the bar is set high. We shall see!
Right now, it doesn’t. Lol.the Midas tac is better in every way except one. Lack of illumination, but for the price difference, I’m not complaining. I got this on the special they did for July 4th. It was a steal!I'd love to hear how it compares to the Midas Tac once you've had time to mess with the Arken a while.
Read the post above. I already said it’s more expensive.Athlon Optics Midas TAC Riflescope 4-16x44 is good, but the price is 200 more than the Arken.
I was doing ground squirrels with my SH4 at 100 yards, low magnification with OLD eyes, can't say which magnification I was on, but I'd guess about 12x or so, maybe less. I absolutely love Arken's, for me they just work.Correct. Reticle just as small. I’d have to use the illumination as a sort of red dot at low mag, and my eyes aren’t too bad!
Shoot what you love. That’s the beauty of having options. What works for you doesn’t necessarily work for everyone. I prefer my Athlons. To each, their own.I was doing ground squirrels with my SH4 at 100 yards, low magnification with OLD eyes, can't say which magnification I was on, but I'd guess about 12x or so, maybe less. I absolutely love Arken's, for me they just work.
Ep5 is best glass I gotta say the epl4 is not optical center sensitive, By that I mean you can have it far off optical center an really no difference it seems , But the ep5 on the other hand you crank it all the way out an its very noticeable your off center asimage quality decreases , But when your centered is it clear an got a bit less aboration than the epl4, but the turrets that always move around if your on the go an bulk/weight of the ep5 makes it deal breaker to me. Selling an arken is easy though already got message again on ebay for ep5.I've been eyeing the Arken scopes myself. Until, I found the below review. It's weird that many reviews don't mention it or maybe they miss it by only testing in one type of light conditions. That said, the Athlon line of scopes are probably a better choice for those that are bothered by chromatic aberration and require additional detail in bright sunlight conditions. Given time Arken will probably climb up the value chain ladder so its worth watching them.
-Marty
PS. The comment above is referencing the SH and not EP line of scopes. Its possible that the EP and EPL line has better glass.
Just tested mine seems to be 12 yards ranged it not a deal breaker for me, But yea that claim is a tad bit off.Did anyone have problems with the EPL4 6-24x50 focusing down to 10 yards as advertised? Mine only focused to 12.5 yards, so no good for field target.
The Arken EPL4 6-24x50 are on sale at Amazon for $440 now!