Arken Optics - new line

I have received my 4–16 ELP yesterday, and have been doing some evaluation with it compared to my other scopes. I am still on the fence about keeping it or not, but I will say that there is a lot of value in this! Compared to some higher priced Leupold scopes, and a NightFirce scope that I own, The Arken has better edge to edge clarity, and has a wider FOV! For my eyes, under 5x is a little hard for my old eyes to see clearly.
The Nightforce is brighter, but I don’t think it’s $500 brighter than the Arken.

The illumination is a little hard for me to use, the knob isn’t a positive stop, but rather a heavy friction indentation between on and off. And the max illumination, is a little weak during the day, but is pretty nice in low light situations.
DE9D0D94-361E-4A52-887C-489F9FD4AD72.jpeg

For me the image quality is really nice between 6X and 12x the IQ diminishes at 14x and above

I haven’t had much experience with a first focal plan scope, so this is a little bit tricky to get used to, if this would have been a second focal plane scope, it would be almost perfect for me.

For the price point, I’m not sure exactly what other scopes might compare equally, I knew that the new Athlon Heras is close in price. That new Element Helix HDLR, looks pretty interesting, but that one is about $170 more than the Arken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pfddi
@Mr.H I agree with your assessment. I have the same scope and found myself dialing down to 12-16 power rather than going higher - same situation as you - old eyes. The IR dial is a PITA to turn! It was also my first FFP scope also being use to SFP for all my life. I have gotten use to it and have bought another FFP, but I also have my eye on the new Element HDLR that may be a great HFT scope! For the money, it is tough to really complain about the Arken!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr.H
Somebody mount the EPL-4 4-16x in a springer gun ( around 13fpe) and you think that this scope Can use for a FT application?

Thanks
I know Arken said they’re springer rated, but I don’t think that ranging with parallax is as precise as you would need for FT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Betohunter
I don't see field target shooters using stock parallax for the match. Seems they always have a larger wheel that is self calibrated for ranges they have tested themselves. I never look at the stock wheel and just look through the scope while I am adjusting for best picture. If it matches the range then good enough, if not oh well.
That is true, but the scope needs a nice sharp parallax adjustment to help range. If the parallax wheel isn’t fine enough, it could read wrong range, and be the difference between hitting a target or not.