Give 'em a try. You might be amazed as to how well they work, Move the 22 at 900fps or better and the 177 at 1000fps or better.
Chris
This is my fav answer.If the projectile has its' center of pressure behind its' center of mass then it has drag stabilization and IMHO is a pellet.
Fx new so called pellet whatever definitely fits this question.The .25 34 grain and the .22 redesign....they look like slug-lets to me!
Glenn in Texas
In California, the slug or pellet is able to identify as anything it wants, not just either or…correct?Here in California, if a pellet identifies as a slug, you have to call it a slug. It's the law. And YES, slugs can get pregnant.
A tiny skirt still produces drag/lift, so those "slullets" technically still are "pellets".
Spin is for slugs.
Matthias
View attachment 280934
I think the main thing .pellets are best shot with speed up to 920 fps may be a bit faster. Anything more it become unstable and the range is shorter because of the aerodynamics or bc, A slug can be shot speeds well above the 920 fps and the range is farther and the bc is better for the longer range. Thats the best i can do,lol here is a pic of both, skirted= drag like a birdie in badminton, and a slug.I've been shooting these JSB "Beast" pellets in both 177 (16.2 grain) and 22 (34 grain) cal. They are really, really good, hit hard and fly repeatably. I have also used what are called slugs with less success. Some weigh more, some less. What is the determining factor? Is it a shape? Does the use of a skirt automatically preclude the name "slug"? Some "slugs" have a hollowed base that I think does the same thing as a skirt. Or is it a weight thing? If so, what is the threshold?
In the powder burning world, the term slug is used as a kind of catch bucket referring to all projectiles. But I'd bet the term was originally coined to describe "lead" bullets. Not to say there aren't lots of different sub-categories... FMJ, HP, HPBT etc etc etc.
So, what is the determining factor that separates pellets from slugs?
Chris