When I went to attach the large side wheel on the scope I found that there is a female recess in it that corresponds to a male protrusion on the focus knob on the scope. It was thoughtful of Athlon to include the short hex wrench which helps a lot because it fits in the slots of the side wheel to tighten the collar of the side wheel around the side focus knob of the scope. Tightened up there is no slop, lash, or anything but a well done interface and great feeling "action" which I feel is the perfect amount of rotational tension!
Caps fit and work well.
The throw lever works fine although the lever on it does start to intrude of the view of where the range markings on the side wheel will be at lower magnifications. Once I start working on ranging distances I'll know more and can comment on it.
The throw lever is made of polymer but seems sturdy enough.
Its worth mentioning that the hex screw does screw into a metal nut which appears encapsulated?? in the polymer which I feel a lot better about vs the screw just fastening into only polymer.
The sunshade threads fit the threads in the scope well. I could feel the quality compared to other scopes from other companies in the past when I felt like the threads interface was loose and wanted to start stripping and or felt like there was gritty sand in the threads.
Right now I'm thinking to myself - why bother talking about any of the controls on this scope?! There's nothing negative to mention. It's the opposite because everything about this scope is fantastic feeling!
I suppose I'll give some applause to the turrets which are simply wonderful. Everything lines up perfect, the feel is great, the ZS is a hard stop, what's not to love?! Those that have had ETR's know what I mean.
AND I like the super simple zero stop system in these Athlon scopes.
This Ares ETR is in MOA and has 1/8th clicks, something I used for many years in the past for FT. I don't mind so much because this is a target scope and is SFP but I'm usually a MIL guy.
The BLR1 reticle is a pretty nice simple reticle. It is on the fine side of reticle line thickness and the center dot is the right size IMHO.
Only the center dot is illuminated and on brightness level 6 it is almost daylight bright which is nice for seeing the dot contrasted against a target in the shade.
It is when the magnification is on 40x/(which is marked in RED on the magnification ring) that MOA is correct for using actual MOA holds.
As I mentioned before - I like those half MOA hashes in this reticle. Seems like most MOA scopes either have 1 MOA or 2 MOA hashes so this one is different. I like things that stray from the norm.
Likely you too but at the top of the list of my scope attribute preferences is how good is the image quality.
Ok, ok, many of you know I'm associated with Athlon so there is a little bit of bias and so I admit that. At the same time because of that association I get miffed when this company does something I don't care for because its kind of a pride thing with me. I get apprehensive before reviewing a new scope because I'm not going to be dishonest about what I experience with it. Gotta tell the truth regardless of the consequences.
I knew as soon as I mounted this scope and focused it at 30Y that the IQ was unexpectedly exceptional = WOW what a crisp clean image focus it has!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So I got my S&B PM2 5-25x56 out for comparison. I looked up close on fine writing on a box, far away on pine needles in trees hundreds of yards away, and no BS here "this ETR is every bit as nice with both scopes set at 25x"???!!!
Then I got out my Cronus G2 4.5-29x56 out to compare both at 29x. Uh this ETR has noticeably superior IQ, what?? I know K at Athlon worked hard with the factory to get nice IQ out of this scope and they certainly surpassed any notions I was expecting! I think the ETR being SFP helps because its got fewer lenses in it but I'm sure there is a lot more to it than that.
I had a Vector Continental 5-30x56 on Purple Reign for the last year for FT and man what a difference there is in about every way between these two scopes. As that year went on I became more and more disappointed with the IQ in the Vector and is the short of my opinion on it. I do love their reticle though so I'll give em that.
Yesterday I brought it out for our Wednesday shoot fest. My friends peered through the ETR. They also were amazed at the IQ by using words like WOE, WOW, etc, as well as nods of approval and shaking of the head in that disbelieving way that people do sometimes.
So at 15x through to 25x the IQ is brilliant and still super nice at 30x.
By 40x the IQ is starting to become slightly dim.
At 60x more dim however still in focus.
The caveat = BUT my $5000 March Genesis has also gotten slightly dim at 40x. The $3500 March HM 5-42x56 I had got both "blurry and dim" by 40x, eek.
And well to "my eyes" for the last decade any high magnification riflescope also becomes more dim by 40x and getting worse as more magnification is used. Part of this is old eyes and part of it is how high mag rifle scopes are. Heck even with decent quality spotting scopes its this way.
If you have good eyes I'm quite sure you will love the IQ in this scope at higher magnification compared to how it is for me.
I couldn't be more happy with my Athlon Ares ETR 15-60x56, what I nice scope!
As time goes by I'll be mentioning anything here in my thread I happen to notice either positive or negative. I also like to edit mistakes or rewrite what I should have said correctly to begin with.