Air Venturi AVENGE-X (Full Review) + Tuning Guide & List of Upgrades

detertst.jpg


Hey guys. This video is a full review of the new Avenge-X in .22. In this video I test the accuracy, tune it for 18.1gr JSB, and show all the differences between the original Avenger and the new Avenge-X. This gun is an even better value than the Avenger was! This wood stock version is solid, smooth, and deadly accurate! Thanks for watching! -Nate


deter.jpg

avenge-xairriflereview.JPG
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the great review. I used to shoot springers like my FWB 124 and I also do some milsurp. I am not really a hunter. O understand the Avenge X is a better rifle. However is it worth the extra for a plinked like me?
While the avenger will give you accurate shots. The avenge x gives you accurate shots, but a lot more and you never get a flyer. The avenge with its tiny tube will poop out pretty fast on accuracy. In my experience the avenge x just shoots lights out the entire time. I would say it is a good buy at 599 for the wood.
 
I know..sorry! PCP is an expensive hobby. And one of the reasons is because they come out with awesome new guns every week.

Heh speak for yourself and for those with little impulse control. I find this hobby inexpensive if done moderately. At 2-5c a shot, 100 shots a week is 2-5$/week, 500 shots 10-25$...provided you buy a gun and are content with it and fill your own air via hand pump or 200-300$ compressor....all in I am probably about 2-3k deep with 2 pcp's and 20,000+ rounds, and both a hand pump and compressor. Still sitting on over about 2,000 rounds, because pcp's are generally (imo) boringly accurate, I don't need to prove to myself I can hit the bull every day...

Compared to building classic cars, going on scuba diving trips, heck even drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes (I do neither) cost more than this hobby, for me...

To say this hobby IS expensive is false, it CAN be expensive, if you're sipping the high end kool-aid thinking it'll make you a better shot, or reach out that extra 100 yards.

Funny because often pcp's are lauded as a cheaper alternative to its counter-parts via cheap ammo, which they are until you do the above...and sip that kool-aid.

-Matt
 
Heh speak for yourself and for those with little impulse control. I find this hobby inexpensive if done moderately. At 2-5c a shot, 100 shots a week is 2-5$/week, 500 shots 10-25$...provided you buy a gun and are content with it and fill your own air via hand pump or 200-300$ compressor....all in I am probably about 2-3k deep with 2 pcp's and 20,000+ rounds, and both a hand pump and compressor. Still sitting on over about 2,000 rounds, because pcp's are generally (imo) boringly accurate, I don't need to prove to myself I can hit the bull every day...

Compared to building classic cars, going on scuba diving trips, heck even drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes (I do neither) cost more than this hobby, for me...

To say this hobby IS expensive is false, it CAN be expensive, if you're sipping the high end kool-aid thinking it'll make you a better shot, or reach out that extra 100 yards.

Funny because often pcp's are lauded as a cheaper alternative to its counter-parts via cheap ammo, which they are until you do the above...and sip that kool-aid.

-Matt
Great point. I do use a $250 compressor and film my channel using the same few tins of pellets all year. I'm super cheap and I get in alot of trigger time for almost no money.
 
Heh speak for yourself and for those with little impulse control. I find this hobby inexpensive if done moderately. At 2-5c a shot, 100 shots a week is 2-5$/week, 500 shots 10-25$...provided you buy a gun and are content with it and fill your own air via hand pump or 200-300$ compressor....all in I am probably about 2-3k deep with 2 pcp's and 20,000+ rounds, and both a hand pump and compressor. Still sitting on over about 2,000 rounds, because pcp's are generally (imo) boringly accurate, I don't need to prove to myself I can hit the bull every day...

Compared to building classic cars, going on scuba diving trips, heck even drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes (I do neither) cost more than this hobby, for me...

To say this hobby IS expensive is false, it CAN be expensive, if you're sipping the high end kool-aid thinking it'll make you a better shot, or reach out that extra 100 yards.

Funny because often pcp's are lauded as a cheaper alternative to its counter-parts via cheap ammo, which they are until you do the above...and sip that kool-aid.

-Matt
I wouldnt say its kooliad. Some just like quality things if we use them alot. There is nothing wrong with that either if thats what they like. Same with those using more inexpensive setups. Its about having fun right? However I wont be delusional in thinking a $200 scope is as good as a $750 or $1500 scope.

Some people think harbor freight tools are great and believe their motto. I call their motto bs and the only thing semi decent there are the apache cases. Yet they still dont stack up to pelican cases. I wont use their tools as cutup tools, let alone everyday use. I've known "professional" mechanics that used the junk and yet wondered why it took them so long to get things done. I tried using their tools and got sick of fighting the garbage and got my tools and was done in no time.

The same is true with kayaks. Some think that pelican or sundolphin kayaks are great. I see them as cheap pool toys. if it gets them on the water great, but I could never recommend one. All of my kayaks are jackssons not because Im a fanboy to the brand but because I love their quality and capabilities. Yes I have over 8k invested in them but they all serve a purpose and have fit and finish or capabilities others don't.

Stihl chainsaws are another example. A friend thought his farm boss was great. He uses it alot on a tree farm. Then when working on the river, he tried my 462 and was blown away at how much better and capable it was. Yes it was 3 times more. But using it all day long and how much better it was makes him want one. It makes our work so much easier and faster.

For myself its the same with airguns. Yes I could have gone with cheaper alternatives as I got into it. It was suggested, if I needed to, that I go with a less expensive rifle and spend more on the glass since you can move that to another rifle later. Its sound advice. However after my first field target match I was hooked. Why would I spend money on a lower quality rifle only to need to sell it later taking a loss, or worse yet be limited by it?

This is why I opted for a Daystate Revere Safari and BRK ghost as my first rifles. They wont be outgrown. Now I did splurge recently and got a redwolf midnight. Its simply an amazing and beautiful rifle. It will be my primary field target rifle. Its a work of art. Did I need to spend that much? No. However everyone I showed it to were wowed by how it looked. So why not go with something beautiful along with practical? It also lets me hand the other rifles to friends and let them shoot and have fun with them knowing they are shooting a quality rifle.

Now I am looking at adding an avenge x. Likely in 25 as a plinker or potential varmiter. I wont mind if it gets dinged up some. Its got decent accuracy and build quality. However it doesnt come close to matching that of the daystates.

I won't look down on someone using lower quality rifles, if thats what they enjoy and like and it gets them into this hobby. However at the same time I expect the same in return and not have them look at me negatively because I chose to spend my money on high quality rifles.
 
I wouldnt say its kooliad. Some just like quality things if we use them alot. There is nothing wrong with that either if thats what they like. Same with those using more inexpensive setups. Its about having fun right? However I wont be delusional in thinking a $200 scope is as good as a $750 or $1500 scope.

Some people think harbor freight tools are great and believe their motto. I call their motto bs and the only thing semi decent there are the apache cases. Yet they still dont stack up to pelican cases. I wont use their tools as cutup tools, let alone everyday use. I've known "professional" mechanics that used the junk and yet wondered why it took them so long to get things done. I tried using their tools and got sick of fighting the garbage and got my tools and was done in no time.

The same is true with kayaks. Some think that pelican or sundolphin kayaks are great. I see them as cheap pool toys. if it gets them on the water great, but I could never recommend one. All of my kayaks are jackssons not because Im a fanboy to the brand but because I love their quality and capabilities. Yes I have over 8k invested in them but they all serve a purpose and have fit and finish or capabilities others don't.

Stihl chainsaws are another example. A friend thought his farm boss was great. He uses it alot on a tree farm. Then when working on the river, he tried my 462 and was blown away at how much better and capable it was. Yes it was 3 times more. But using it all day long and how much better it was makes him want one. It makes our work so much easier and faster.

For myself its the same with airguns. Yes I could have gone with cheaper alternatives as I got into it. It was suggested, if I needed to, that I go with a less expensive rifle and spend more on the glass since you can move that to another rifle later. Its sound advice. However after my first field target match I was hooked. Why would I spend money on a lower quality rifle only to need to sell it later taking a loss, or worse yet be limited by it?

This is why I opted for a Daystate Revere Safari and BRK ghost as my first rifles. They wont be outgrown. Now I did splurge recently and got a redwolf midnight. Its simply an amazing and beautiful rifle. It will be my primary field target rifle. Its a work of art. Did I need to spend that much? No. However everyone I showed it to were wowed by how it looked. So why not go with something beautiful along with practical? It also lets me hand the other rifles to friends and let them shoot and have fun with them knowing they are shooting a quality rifle.

Now I am looking at adding an avenge x. Likely in 25 as a plinker or potential varmiter. I wont mind if it gets dinged up some. Its got decent accuracy and build quality. However it doesnt come close to matching that of the daystates.

I won't look down on someone using lower quality rifles, if thats what they enjoy and like and it gets them into this hobby. However at the same time I expect the same in return and not have them look at me negatively because I chose to spend my money on high quality rifles.

I don't look down on anyone unless they put others down through personal attacks...I am far from the only person who feels certain airguns are over-priced, if you take offense to that, there's nothing I can do for you, as it's a perfectly acceptable stance to have.

-Matt
 
Stubbers, really? You make a reply to me quoting my reply, running your mouth, yet you block me right after you post it? THATS amusing and shows your mentality which is sad.

I never once attacked you. However it was sadly clear with your comments that you were thumbing your nose at those that like to buy quality guns. Yes the price of the higher end guns is a bit steep, but there are many that see the value and worth in them. Don't look down at others that do so, just like they shouldnt look down at you for shooting low cost rifles.
 
While the avenger will give you accurate shots. The avenge x gives you accurate shots, but a lot more and you never get a flyer. The avenge with its tiny tube will poop out pretty fast on accuracy. In my experience the avenge x just shoots lights out the entire time. I would say it is a good buy at 599 for the wood.

Thank you so much this is the info I was looking for. Sometimes an upgrade makes the model before it a great vale sometimes not. In this case the later seems true
 
I wouldnt say its kooliad. Some just like quality things if we use them alot. There is nothing wrong with that either if thats what they like. Same with those using more inexpensive setups. Its about having fun right? However I wont be delusional in thinking a $200 scope is as good as a $750 or $1500 scope.

Some people think harbor freight tools are great and believe their motto. I call their motto bs and the only thing semi decent there are the apache cases. Yet they still dont stack up to pelican cases. I wont use their tools as cutup tools, let alone everyday use. I've known "professional" mechanics that used the junk and yet wondered why it took them so long to get things done. I tried using their tools and got sick of fighting the garbage and got my tools and was done in no time.

The same is true with kayaks. Some think that pelican or sundolphin kayaks are great. I see them as cheap pool toys. if it gets them on the water great, but I could never recommend one. All of my kayaks are jackssons not because Im a fanboy to the brand but because I love their quality and capabilities. Yes I have over 8k invested in them but they all serve a purpose and have fit and finish or capabilities others don't.

Stihl chainsaws are another example. A friend thought his farm boss was great. He uses it alot on a tree farm. Then when working on the river, he tried my 462 and was blown away at how much better and capable it was. Yes it was 3 times more. But using it all day long and how much better it was makes him want one. It makes our work so much easier and faster.

For myself its the same with airguns. Yes I could have gone with cheaper alternatives as I got into it. It was suggested, if I needed to, that I go with a less expensive rifle and spend more on the glass since you can move that to another rifle later. Its sound advice. However after my first field target match I was hooked. Why would I spend money on a lower quality rifle only to need to sell it later taking a loss, or worse yet be limited by it?

This is why I opted for a Daystate Revere Safari and BRK ghost as my first rifles. They wont be outgrown. Now I did splurge recently and got a redwolf midnight. Its simply an amazing and beautiful rifle. It will be my primary field target rifle. Its a work of art. Did I need to spend that much? No. However everyone I showed it to were wowed by how it looked. So why not go with something beautiful along with practical? It also lets me hand the other rifles to friends and let them shoot and have fun with them knowing they are shooting a quality rifle.

Now I am looking at adding an avenge x. Likely in 25 as a plinker or potential varmiter. I wont mind if it gets dinged up some. Its got decent accuracy and build quality. However it doesnt come close to matching that of the daystates.

I won't look down on someone using lower quality rifles, if thats what they enjoy and like and it gets them into this hobby. However at the same time I expect the same in return and not have them look at me negatively because I chose to spend my money on high quality rifles.
 
I am a very practical person and also love quality over quantity. That said, in somethings in life(material) is overpriced, over spec'd for what you want it to do. (who doesn't like a Mercedes over a Chrysler?) Case and point, If you shot a Daystate or FX or AEA (regardless of model or caliber) and we both shot targets and varying ranges in front of a blinded panel of judges and not knowing what was being shot and the end result is the same down range then what do you have? Other than my gun is better than yours, or looks better than yours, costs more than yours, or I belong to a group of elitists who because they overpaid for what they have feel compelled to defend their purchases. Pretty humbling to me. I understand there are capabilities far beyond entry and mid-range rifles. I spent my life in the military, continued Federal service after until I recently retired at age 62. I have used owned numerous traditional firearms and have used and fired weapons in my lifetime the average hunter Joe knows nothing about other than reading about it. But my point is not about traditional firearms. A recreational air rifle is about fun and at a lower cost and to garner the same comraderies you would have if it was all about traditional firearms. I almost went for a FX M3 myself until I reeled myself back in. (my wife helped haha) Instead, I decided for target practice and critter control in the rural South Georgia where I live, given the terrain, the Avenge X 25 Cal is more than capable and saved hundreds. Yes, I like those expensive PCPs too. But you have really watch out for the Kool-Aid out there. In the end its a business. Last thing as an example of Kool-Aid. There is a website (to remain anonymous) Who usually opens up with something along the lines: Where we give you the facts and NOT THE FLUFF! Give me a break! I got to the point of never watching any of those videos anymore. To me, they felt disingenuous to the viewers and cater to the sponsors at the same time throwing you a bone. I do enjoy hearing about others experiences as it relates to mine.
M1a1.jpeg
 
I am a very practical person and also love quality over quantity. That said, in somethings in life(material) is overpriced, over spec'd for what you want it to do. (who doesn't like a Mercedes over a Chrysler?) Case and point, If you shot a Daystate or FX or AEA (regardless of model or caliber) and we both shot targets and varying ranges in front of a blinded panel of judges and not knowing what was being shot and the end result is the same down range then what do you have? Other than my gun is better than yours, or looks better than yours, costs more than yours, or I belong to a group of elitists who because they overpaid for what they have feel compelled to defend their purchases. Pretty humbling to me. I understand there are capabilities far beyond entry and mid-range rifles. I spent my life in the military, continued Federal service after until I recently retired at age 62. I have used owned numerous traditional firearms and have used and fired weapons in my lifetime the average hunter Joe knows nothing about other than reading about it. But my point is not about traditional firearms. A recreational air rifle is about fun and at a lower cost and to garner the same comraderies you would have if it was all about traditional firearms. I almost went for a FX M3 myself until I reeled myself back in. (my wife helped haha) Instead, I decided for target practice and critter control in the rural South Georgia where I live, given the terrain, the Avenge X 25 Cal is more than capable and saved hundreds. Yes, I like those expensive PCPs too. But you have really watch out for the Kool-Aid out there. In the end its a business. Last thing as an example of Kool-Aid. There is a website (to remain anonymous) Who usually opens up with something along the lines: Where we give you the facts and NOT THE FLUFF! Give me a break! I got to the point of never watching any of those videos anymore. To me, they felt disingenuous to the viewers and cater to the sponsors at the same time throwing you a bone. I do enjoy hearing about others experiences as it relates to mine.
View attachment 402619
Sadly too true with the videos. Its been disclosed that many have to sign agreements where they cant state negative aspects in order to get a gun to test. To me this is just flat wrong. They are more like infomercials.

The avenge x is a decent rifle. I will likely get one to have as a beater. However the fit and feel of many high quality rifles cant be ignored. If you were blindfolded and handed a rifle, you likely would be a high end rifle by the feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jay308
Sadly too true with the videos. Its been disclosed that many have to sign agreements where they cant state negative aspects in order to get a gun to test. To me this is just flat wrong. They are more like infomercials.

The avenge x is a decent rifle. I will likely get one to have as a beater. However the fit and feel of many high quality rifles cant be ignored. If you were blindfolded and handed a rifle, you likely would be a high end rifle by the feel.
The paid “reviewers” are influencers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MysticalDragon