Not crazy.
Not weird.
Just human.
➠ Because humans are
creatures of habit.
We generally dislike change (unless the change is a change in salary, meaning an
increase....
)
➠ That's why
most people are not really all that excited about
progress —
or improved teaching methods — or new crop seeds — or anything else that can be improved and developed....
Because it requires
change....
Matthias
Thank you for that.
Back on topic, I don’t have an element scope, but I do have a Hawke. Here’s what I like:
Pros: it’s clear, not NF clear but pretty dang good. A little clouding on the edge at max power but very very minimal.
The crosshairs are very crisp and I really like the skeletonized duplex towards the edge.
Parallax is crisp and seems to be pretty close to distance, but it will trick you little if you’re using the focus ring to dial for distance.
Elevation and wind age turrets seem to track very well and have a distinct click when moved.
Mine is a compact, so there’s added challenges to make everything fit and work. All in all, I like it.
Cons: crosshairs are a bit thick/large, it’s easy to cover a small target at range especially if you’re just using hood over.
No half Mil hash marks in the crosshairs to hold when using Kentucky windage.
I guess really that’s my only complaint, I just don’t particularly like the crosshairs. Everything else is pretty good. Awesome box, I mean top notch. Illumination could work as a flashlight, it’s bright. I just wish the crosshairs were better for what I do.
Long range precision(75-150yds) on mainly starlings. Hope that helps.
Andy
