Brocock/BRK BRK Sniper XR Sahara vs AGT Uragan 2 Compact

Jump to latest Follow Reply
I’ve been considering these models myself lately. Not a ton of reviews but I hear good things about both. 30-50 yards should be piece of cake for either. There’s YouTube videos by Ben Pierson on the Sahara. Absolute laser at 50 and very impressive at 100. I should of got one before AOA marked them up a little haha.
Curious to see what guys on here say.
 
Upvote 0
Brocock/BRK because I own a .25 Bantam Sniper HR and am familiar with the platform. It's deadly within 50-60 yards and I mean that in a literal sense. It's a well built rifle and it shoulders great with its semi-bullpup design. I can't see myself parting with my Bantam Sniper. The Sahara is based on the Sniper XR platform and BRK has just upped their support for those rifles by recently releasing instructional videos on maintenance/repair of the platform. They're good to go, quality air rifles. From what I recall, the Sahara performs a little better than the Sniper XR. There are some small differences, but I don't remember the specific specs. I can't speak to the AGT Urugan 2, but I've read good things about it.
 
Upvote 0
@JackAttack117, I bet either would suit in the usage scenarios you described… So its ultimately its going to be some decisive feature or not, that drives your decision. I am partial to the BRKs, owned a Bantam Sniper HR, a precursor to the Sahara XR. It was a stellar performer for me. Currently own a Pathfinder XR, the familial resemblance between it and the Commander and Sahara XRs is undeniable. But more importantly they all perform consistently… It seems to me you can’t lose no matter which brand you choose. Good luck and keep us all posted…🙏
 
Upvote 0
Ezana4CE said:
Brocock/BRK because I own a .25 Bantam Sniper HR and am familiar with the platform. It's deadly within 50-60 yards and I mean that in a literal sense. It's a well built rifle and it shoulders great with its semi-bullpup design. I can't see myself parting with my Bantam Sniper. The Sahara is based on the Sniper XR platform and BRK has just upped their support for those rifles by recently releasing instructional videos on maintenance/repair of the platform. They're good to go, quality air rifles. From what I recall, the Sahara performs a little better than the Sniper XR. There are some small differences, but I don't remember the specific specs. I can't speak to the AGT Urugan 2, but I've read good things about it.
Click to expand...


I have both versions of the Brocock mentioned. Other than cosmetics and a different stock, the essentials appear to be identical. I CANNOT say one is superior to shoot over the other. Both are equally amazing and even in that regard. Just incredibly well made !!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezana4CE
Upvote 0
erock said:
I have both versions of the Brocock mentioned. Other than cosmetics and a different stock, the essentials appear to be identical. I CANNOT say one is superior to shoot over the other. Both are equally amazing and even in that regard. Just incredibly well made !!
Click to expand...
@erock At first glance comparing the two what stands out is that the Sahara is described as having an "upgraded hammer and valve." As for the XR and XR Sniper they're described as having a "a revised hammer and valve assembly." What the means exactly I cannot say. My impression based upon published information leads me to believe that there are subtle differences besides color considering that I recall the XR and Sniper XR being released before the Sahara. I could be mistaken and beyond that I can't elaborate. It had been a while since I'd read up on the two variants prior to my initial post. What's also strange are the published differences in fpe/joules between the regular XR and the Sahara. The XR seem to have a slight edge. Most notably the Sahara appears to be shorter in length according to specs (32.25") as opposed to the XR/Sniper XR at 34" and the Sniper Magnum XR at 39". Anyhow just something I noticed and didn't forget about. If you own both, I'm interested in what you have to say from experience.

Source of my info:
Sahara Description https://brocock.co.uk/sahara-xr/
XR and Sniper XR description https://brocock.co.uk/brocock-xr/
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Ezana4CE said:
@erock At first glance comparing the two what stands out is that the Sahara is described as having an "upgraded hammer and valve." As for the XR and XR Sniper they're described as having a "a revised hammer and valve assembly." What the means exactly I cannot say. My impression based upon published information leads me to believe that there are subtle differences besides color considering that I recall the XR and Sniper XR being released before the Sahara. I could be mistaken and beyond that I can't elaborate. It had been a while since I'd read up on the two variants prior to my initial post. What's also strange are the published differences in fpe/joules between the regular XR and the Sahara. The XR seem to have a slight edge. Most notably the Sahara appears to be shorter in length according to specs (32.25") as opposed to the XR/Sniper XR at 34" and the Sniper Magnum XR at 39". Anyhow just something I noticed and didn't forget about. If you own both, I'm interested in what you have to say from experience.

Source of my info:
Sahara Description https://brocock.co.uk/sahara-xr/
XR and Sniper XR description https://brocock.co.uk/brocock-xr/
Click to expand...
The Bantam Sniper XR and Sahara XR are the “same” gun… Both sport the same 17” barrels, power plants, regs, etc… The shroud on the Sahara is 2.75” shorter is all, oh, and the color… The specs are easily comparable on the AOA website… 🙏
 
Upvote 0
L.Leon said:
The Bantam Sniper XR and Sahara XR are the “same” gun… Both sport the same 17” barrels, power plants, regs, etc… The shroud on the Sahara is 2.75” shorter is all, oh, and the color… The specs are easily comparable on the AOA website… 🙏
Click to expand...
It appears that these rifles are ver similar, if not the "same," as @L.Leon stated. Thanks for the correction. I watched this video this morning and the variations are described as "stock options" without mention of any other differences.


My apologies if Ihave confused anyone and I certainly didn't mean to derail the thread. With that said, the Sniper is still a great platform. @JackAttack117 Decisions, decisions. let us know what you select for yourself.
 
Upvote 0
JackAttack117 said:
Decisions, decisions, indeed... I'm going to let it simmer for a while and try to find a way to see one or both in person prior to purchasing.
Click to expand...
@JackAttack117 I don't recall which airgun shops are in MS, but if you a get to one to handle the guns or at least one that should be helpful. I don't think you could go wrong. The main difference between the two is the Urugan is a bullpup (action close to your ear) and the Sahara is a semi-bullpup with more of a traditional rifle feel with the exception of the bottle reservoir.
 
Upvote 0
@JackAttack117 This thread may also be worth looking at.

Brocock/BRK - My experience with first PCP

I took months to research all the options. My initial thoughts were there was no way I would spend more than a few hundred dollars on an airgun, no matter if it's a PCP or a springer. As I read more and more, the motto buy once cry once became more evident. I narrowed down my choices and...
www.airgunnation.com www.airgunnation.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackAttack117
Upvote 0
Ezana4CE said:
@erock At first glance comparing the two what stands out is that the Sahara is described as having an "upgraded hammer and valve." As for the XR and XR Sniper they're described as having a "a revised hammer and valve assembly." What the means exactly I cannot say. My impression based upon published information leads me to believe that there are subtle differences besides color considering that I recall the XR and Sniper XR being released before the Sahara. I could be mistaken and beyond that I can't elaborate. It had been a while since I'd read up on the two variants prior to my initial post. What's also strange are the published differences in fpe/joules between the regular XR and the Sahara. The XR seem to have a slight edge. Most notably the Sahara appears to be shorter in length according to specs (32.25") as opposed to the XR/Sniper XR at 34" and the Sniper Magnum XR at 39". Anyhow just something I noticed and didn't forget about. If you own both, I'm interested in what you have to say from experience.

Source of my info:
Sahara Description https://brocock.co.uk/sahara-xr/
XR and Sniper XR description https://brocock.co.uk/brocock-xr/
Click to expand...

Correction on my part. I own the Safari, not the Sahara. It has the rustic wood stock. It seems to have a noticeably lighter/match-grade feel at the trigger over my Sniper XR in polymer stock form. Perhaps it has that upgrade mentioned. Both are .25 cal magnums, and an absolute JOY to shoot!! Accuracy is insanely consistent. Both are just so well made and precision engineered......
 
  • Love
Reactions: L.Leon
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Resources
Menu