I'll chime in here with some controversial comments. Full disclosure, I have both an HR and an XR magnum in.22, so I must like em.
I'll stick to the XR because that's you concern.
The good.....
Almost all good. The weight, comfort, balance, fit and finish are fantastic, really, probably the most comfortable gun I own. Accuracy is amazing, out shoots most of my rifles and I have some seriously accurate rifles.
The bad....
I wouldn't call it a deal breaker, but the trgger is a sour point. It's not a two stage. It's a single stage with take up built into the trigger mechanism. The take up does not mean more sear engagement during first stage, as in a true two stage trigger. So if you like it light, you'll be carrying a gun with very little sear engagement. Since these guns are capable of amazing long range accuracy, I like mine light, BUT, you have to be careful when cocking it as if handled rough, it might fire. It's that or adjust for more engagement and much worse trigger. It can be good but you just have to accept the care involved. I love the precision designed into trigger, but the overall design is not well thought out (for an airgun) and should not be allowed to be called two stage. I don't mean this as bashing, but I do think airgun buyers expecting a trigger similar to other two stage trigger guns should be aware of the difference, which is more akin to a powder burner trigger. No single stage trigger can be as refined and light as a true two stage trigger and remain safe. On this rifle the safety only blocks the trigger, leaving the sear lever free to be bumped off its engagement. Had it blocked the sear, you could have lighter triggers on them.
Having voiced my concerns, I must say, I use mine adjusted very light and am careful when cocking to not point it anywhere it might hurt something and I carry it very little cocked.
I've shot 100 yard 2" groups with amazing regularity, and mine has the lowest ES of any gun I own, usually in the 4-7 fps zone for a full 50-55 shot string, that's why I keep it!