BSA Meteor Super Initial Impressions

Got my .177 Meteor Super in this morning and have about 50 shots through it. I can't imagine anything is going to change so here are my unasked for thoughts and opinions on this gun.

20221224_140513.jpg


Stock: Looks darn good but that comb just isn't great for iron use. I had to crane my neck forward and down to get a decent sight picture. For scope use though it is fantastic. My head falls right into place and I'm ready to go instantly. Zero complaints in that department. The butt pad is soft and grips my shoulder well. If really does feel great to shoulder this gun.

20221224_140742.jpg
20221224_140720.jpg


Metal finish: "meh". The bluing isn't great and machine markes are pretty obvious if you look closely. From a few feet back it looks absolutely fine though. Good from afar, but far from good. While this isn't really a "finish" aspect of the gun I would like to note that BSA was kind enough to add a threaded barrel. That was a nice touch!

Trigger: Suprisingly not terrible. I do want to say I like it better than the Terrus trigger but I need time with it still. Its absolutely no Rekord but I don't think anyone was expecting it to be. I didn't use a scale but I'll put it somewhere around 3lbs. There is a very light "first stage" take up followed by a solid wall. Theres a bit of creep before tripping but it really isn't terrible. Its a hunting trigger through and through but nothing to write home about.

EDIT: NOTES TO ADD TO TRIGGER PULL

Trigger pull weights (5 pulls):
2lbs 11.5oz
2lbs 14.2oz
2lbs 13.8oz
2lbs 12.4oz
2lbs 14.6oz
20221224_183215.jpg


Trigger pull weight is on the heavier side but it is pretty consistent which I am happy about. Like I stated before, it is certainly no Rekord but still plenty usable.

Cocking Effort and Feel: I like it. Pretty easy and pretty quick. Very smooth down stroke but entirely too much rubbing noise in the up stroke. It sounds like the cocking arm is dragging across the stock and its annoying especially concidering how quiet the lockup and cocking stroke actually are. I'll be fixing this first.

Shot Cycle and Recoil: Its quick but the recoil is fairly tame. I dont hate it at all but time will tell here too. I did find the gun to be a tad jumpy but getting my hand between the gun and front bag completely fixed that issue. Suprisingly the jumpiness didn't affect the group sized too much.

Iron sights, trigger and safely are all a big turn off. They are incredibly cheap plastic which have no place on a gun with a $350 ($499 retail?) price tag. The rear sight is held on by a Phillips head screw. I don't know about any of you guys but I hate Phillips head screws. They just scream "good enough" and "costs were cut" when I see them on a gun.

20221224_140804.jpg
20221224_140745.jpg


Accuracy: I am happy with the accuracy so far. I did not shoot this gun a whole lot but I did put 20 shots on paper at 12yds (10 per group) to see where the gun stands. I used a few different holds through this process and did not find the gun to be particularly hold sensitive which is fantastic on a gun I plan to use for small pests. I fully expect these groups to improve with time as there was a very distinct smell of dieseling throughout the whole process.

20221224_134955.jpg


Accuracy Update: 10 Shots using 8.2gr Meisterkugeln @ 12yds. These appear to be the clear winner as of now. Hoping the wind dies down soon to see what the gun can do at a more appropriate 30m

20221225_120706.jpg


Velocity: 5 shots over the chrono (will test more) show very consistent readings with JSB 8.44gr. ES of 4fps with a SD of 1.5fps. Two thumbs up if that remains consistent. I'll be very happy with 12 and 3 over a 20 shot string though.

Screenshot_20221224-132023_FX Radar.jpg
Screenshot_20221224-132026_FX Radar.jpg


Weight and Balance: Gold star and I do mean GOLD. It is an incredibly handy little rifle that keeps up with the Terrus and HW50S all day in this department. Its a pleasure to shoulder and even with my heavy 4-16x UTG Swat on there the gun balanced phenomenally.

Would I recommend it? In a world where the HW50S already exists, absolutely not, at least not for its going price. The 50S is basically the same price and is superior in nearly every way. While it does look very nice for the most part the overall quality is closer to what you would find on a Gamo than you would a Weihrauch yet the price tag says differently. I'm not upset that I paid $350 for this gun but I honestly don't see it being worth more than $250-$300 out the door. That being said, so far I do truly like this gun and I look forward to toying around with it over the next few weeks. This gun seems to have great potential.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. I was considering it, but will pass after your review.
Its certainly not going to be for everyone. I personally wanted one because I wanted to see how a sub 12ftlb gas ram felt in comparison to a good old fashioned coiled spring. In my opinion the coil spring is still a clear winner. The cocking stroke of the BSA is definitely a bit more arm friendly than a 50S though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thumper
Excellent review! Nice to hear some honest impressions with some hard data.

I was looking at one of these but the gas ram was the deal breaker for me, I just don't like them.

I bet the accuracy will be great on this one as long as the breech shim/lockup setup is sturdy. The barrel is probably great.

From what you've shared here, I agree that the 50S is a much better bang for the buck. But, it's fun to have something a little different every now and then. Any new piston gun always gets my attention :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sqwirl57
Excellent review! Nice to hear some honest impressions with some hard data.

I was looking at one of these but the gas ram was the deal breaker for me, I just don't like them.

I bet the accuracy will be great on this one as long as the breech shim/lockup setup is sturdy. The barrel is probably great.

From what you've shared here, I agree that the 50S is a much better bang for the buck. But, it's fun to have something a little different every now and then. Any new piston gun always gets my attention :)
Thats exactly why I got it. Its new and different and it met my expectation there. To top it off I really like how BSA styled the stock. It's a bit more artisanal than a lot of what we see these days. The gun itself is actually a bit better than what I was expecting aside from all the plastic (🤢🤮). I thought the trigger was going to be much worse than it actually is. Heavy doesn't always have to mean bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thumper
Thats exactly why I got it. Its new and different and it met my expectation there. To top it off I really like how BSA styled the stock. It's a bit more artisanal than a lot of what we see these days. The gun itself is actually a bit better than what I was expecting aside from all the plastic (🤢🤮). I thought the trigger was going to be much worse than it actually is. Heavy doesn't always have to mean bad.
Agreed on all counts.

I'll take a heavy but crisp trigger over light and unpredictable any day.

Case in point, the Red Wolf trigger. Total garbage as far as crisp goes, but it's LIGHT lol.

2-3# is light by powder burner standards! :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sqwirl57
Looks like a half decent gun. Can the trigger be adjusted at all? Doesn't come with twang as the only available option from the factory. But I'm not a fan of artsy stocks. BSA offered more traditional styling that I like.
View attachment 316688View attachment 316689View attachment 316690

I don't think this was traditional in 1905 though. (1906 model shown "BSA Air Rifle")
View attachment 316697
I haven't actually played with the trigger yet but I plan to tomorrow. I do see a small screw through the trigger guard but what it actually does I have no clue yet. As far as twang goes, this gun is factory twangless due to the gas piston.
 
I haven't actually played with the trigger yet but I plan to tomorrow. I do see a small screw through the trigger guard but what it actually does I have no clue yet. As far as twang goes, this gun is factory twangless due to the gas piston.
I'll stay tuned in.
Fully understand it's a rammer. I have two Theoben rammers me self. Both early long stroke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sqwirl57
"... overall quality is closer to what you would find on a Gamo than on a Weihrauch...". Considering Gamo owns BSA, are you really surprised?
I think most people here are well aware of that already which was my reasoning for using Gamo as the example. The next part of my sentence was the point I was trying to drive home. If BSA is going to exist to be Gamos "higher end" division then they need to quit cutting so many corners. This gun does not compete on that higher level unfortunately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FarmPlinker
Well, Gamo has owned BSA for many years. Almost 45? During that time BSA has produced some very nice guns. The Stutzens, Superstars, UK Supersports and Lightnings. And some very good (on par) PCP's. Some consider BSA barrels superior to HW and others. Triggers on the springers could be a bit better but more than sufficient for hunting and plinking. All far superior to the Gamo line IMO.
70's Triumph motorcycles were merely rubbish (60's too if you ask me). But look! Now Triumph supplies the engines for the World GP2 roadracing series. British engineering isn't dead. Can BSA springers rise again?
 
Well, Gamo has owned BSA for many years. Almost 45? During that time BSA has produced some very nice guns. The Stutzens, Superstars, UK Supersports and Lightnings. And some very good (on par) PCP's. Some consider BSA barrels superior to HW and others. Triggers on the springers could be a bit better but more than sufficient for hunting and plinking. All far superior to the Gamo line IMO.
70's Triumph motorcycles were merely rubbish (60's too if you ask me). But look! Now Triumph supplies the engines for the World GP2 roadracing series. British engineering isn't dead. Can BSA springers rise again?
Its definitely superior to everything on the Gamo line there is no doubt about that. The BSA has an adjustable pivot whereas the Gamos do not. The breach block is also not plastic whereas the Gamo are. The safety lever on the gun is in fact metal after removing the stock but the button the use to actuate it is incredibly cheap looking plastic. They went for a stylish looking gun here and then went and did that... I do not understand it. Its not a small lever either. It sticks out like a sore thumb and is one of the first things you take notice of.

If BSA wants to rise back to the top they need to fix small things like that and they absolutely need to fix the trigger. Let's be real here; it's a sub 12ftlb gun. Was there really any reason to use a gas ram over a coiled spring? NO. They went Gamo on us because of the "gas rams are superior" BS that Gamo likes to push on the industry.

To make matters worse though it isn't even quieter cocking because they have an arm and bearing built into the cocking linkage that rides on grainy wood. Its loud and quite noticeable. The stock itself is used to keep the linkage in place so you can cock the gun. It's very, very basic.
 
I'll stay tuned in.
Fully understand it's a rammer. I have two Theoben rammers me self. Both early long stroke.

As far as trigger adjustment goes, yes and no? There is a screw behind the trigger blade that seems to shorten the first stage quite a bit but even after several turns outward the trigger pull remains at 2lbs 10oz +/- a couple ounces. It makes the trigger also feel a bit mushier more than anything else.
 
1 full tin in. Still smoking (actually got worse) and then the groups started opening up. It keeps bouncing between shotgun and tight groups at 12yds. Im assuming factory lube keeps slipping past the seal.

20221225_150117.jpg


Here's the issue though... she's also down 40% of her previous muzzle energy. It passes a tissue test so I'm fairly certain either the piston seal is melted (likely?) or the piston is starting to go already. I'm going to keep shooting and contact AoA on Monday or Tuesday.

Screenshot_20221225-145339_FX Radar.jpg
Screenshot_20221225-145344_FX Radar.jpg