Anybody have one ,what are your thoughts on it...any have the 6x24 x50 model,Thanks..
Capped turrets? No illumination? Center dot reticle?
.
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
When I bought my first Nitro, it was $569, and my Midas Tac was $589. I'd say that's pretty comparable and both were "on sale". At $369 or thereabouts , the Nitro isn't a bad choice. Maybe your sample and mine are the extremes? All I know is this one is quite good. 4 of us were comparing 5 different scopes at the same mag yesterday evening (14x, cause that's what 2 of them were). General consensus was that the M T could resolve the most detail and had the best turrets and reticle. The high end was a Sightron 10-50 FT scope, also turned down to 14x. Honorable mention was the Primary Arms 4-14. Very clear glass and nice reticle.... around $250. Turrets were a little bit stiff and indistinct but seemingly very precise.
Fwiw, the Sightron was very good.... no complaints.
Bob
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
When I bought my first Nitro, it was $569, and my Midas Tac was $589. I'd say that's pretty comparable and both were "on sale". At $369 or thereabouts , the Nitro isn't a bad choice. Maybe your sample and mine are the extremes? All I know is this one is quite good. 4 of us were comparing 5 different scopes at the same mag yesterday evening (14x, cause that's what 2 of them were). General consensus was that the M T could resolve the most detail and had the best turrets and reticle. The high end was a Sightron 10-50 FT scope, also turned down to 14x. Honorable mention was the Primary Arms 4-14. Very clear glass and nice reticle.... around $250. Turrets were a little bit stiff and indistinct but seemingly very precise.
Fwiw, the Sightron was very good.... no complaints.
Bob
If you like the Primary Arms 4-14x you should try the $100 BSA 4-14x from Aliexpress you'll see what my scope gripe is all about. Yo!
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
Is the SFP 5-20x44 Bushnell Nitro still on sale at Camera Land for only $199? If so that's got to be the most awesome deal I have seen in a while if you are ok with SFP. YO!
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
When I bought my first Nitro, it was $569, and my Midas Tac was $589. I'd say that's pretty comparable and both were "on sale". At $369 or thereabouts , the Nitro isn't a bad choice. Maybe your sample and mine are the extremes? All I know is this one is quite good. 4 of us were comparing 5 different scopes at the same mag yesterday evening (14x, cause that's what 2 of them were). General consensus was that the M T could resolve the most detail and had the best turrets and reticle. The high end was a Sightron 10-50 FT scope, also turned down to 14x. Honorable mention was the Primary Arms 4-14. Very clear glass and nice reticle.... around $250. Turrets were a little bit stiff and indistinct but seemingly very precise.
Fwiw, the Sightron was very good.... no complaints.
Bob
If you like the Primary Arms 4-14x you should try the $100 BSA 4-14x from Aliexpress you'll see what my scope gripe is all about. Yo!
Arz and I have/had the BSA 4-14x44 when Midway had them for $250. Not bad in most ways except for the glass which was kinda poor. The PA that Arz mentioned had much better glass than those BSA's had, and so does the Talos BTR. In glass, Arz gave the PA the nod and the others voted a tie between it and the Talos BTR.
I was surprised to see the Midas TAC gave the most resolution and pleasant image quality of all of them, including that Sightron, and a Ares BTR??????
The Midas is a lot more$$$$
Maybe just my eyes, but for over $600 I was not impressed with my Midas Tac 6-24. Sold it within a month of purchase
When I bought my first Nitro, it was $569, and my Midas Tac was $589. I'd say that's pretty comparable and both were "on sale". At $369 or thereabouts , the Nitro isn't a bad choice. Maybe your sample and mine are the extremes? All I know is this one is quite good. 4 of us were comparing 5 different scopes at the same mag yesterday evening (14x, cause that's what 2 of them were). General consensus was that the M T could resolve the most detail and had the best turrets and reticle. The high end was a Sightron 10-50 FT scope, also turned down to 14x. Honorable mention was the Primary Arms 4-14. Very clear glass and nice reticle.... around $250. Turrets were a little bit stiff and indistinct but seemingly very precise.
Fwiw, the Sightron was very good.... no complaints.
Bob
If you like the Primary Arms 4-14x you should try the $100 BSA 4-14x from Aliexpress you'll see what my scope gripe is all about. Yo!
Arz and I have/had the BSA 4-14x44 when Midway had them for $250. Not bad in most ways except for the glass which was kinda poor. The PA that Arz mentioned had much better glass than those BSA's had, and so does the Talos BTR. In glass, Arz gave the PA the nod and the others voted a tie between it and the Talos BTR.
I was surprised to see the Midas TAC gave the most resolution and pleasant image quality of all of them, including that Sightron, and a Ares BTR??????
Is this $100 Aliexpress BSA 4-14x the same scope as the Midway BSA 4-14x for $250? The $100 Aliexpress looks like a Mueller 8-32x at least very similar in construction but the cheap $100 Aliexpress has a TAC Vector or SWFA SS type reticle and is surprisingly bright and clear regardless of how cheap it cost. Yo!