So. I have an idea about usability and selection.
I feel that there are overlaps in calibers and capabilities.
For instance.
I don't care for .177. but it's still a usable caliber for small game.
177
20
22
25
30
35
45
50.
I know there are more but I feel those are the most popular.
So for "hunting" as paper don't care about damage. I would say a set of 177, 25, 45 would cover a wind range of prey.
As I prefer nothing smaller than 22... I would say 22, 35, 50 would be a solid covering of calibers and you could tune the pellet weight to what ya plan to kill.
What caliber(s) would you guys say for the best selection to cover small to large game?
Coverage from small to large least amount of calibers?
I feel that there are overlaps in calibers and capabilities.
For instance.
I don't care for .177. but it's still a usable caliber for small game.
177
20
22
25
30
35
45
50.
I know there are more but I feel those are the most popular.
So for "hunting" as paper don't care about damage. I would say a set of 177, 25, 45 would cover a wind range of prey.
As I prefer nothing smaller than 22... I would say 22, 35, 50 would be a solid covering of calibers and you could tune the pellet weight to what ya plan to kill.
What caliber(s) would you guys say for the best selection to cover small to large game?
Coverage from small to large least amount of calibers?