FWIW my HW95L .22 Chrono #s after 5K shots with an ARH kit using FTT 14.66 gr averages 719 FPS with 4 FPS spread over 15 shots.
Upvote 0
I did buy a tuned HW95L in .25 awhile back for my brother. It’s definitely capable with the 20.14 FTT but it can’t match my 52 .25; hence why I want a tuned 80.FWIW my HW95L .22 Chrono #s after 5K shots with an ARH kit using FTT 14.66 gr averages 719 FPS with 4 FPS spread over 15 shots.
The 90 is a different animal. The .25 was the first Weihrauch I bought. When factory there was nothing I liked about it except it’s superior looking. Bought other rifles the 90 collected dust. Not long ago I attached the gauge and pump to the 90’s I have .20 as well, not the same gun. I like the springers but the 90’s are interesting. There’s a 22 cal. for sale up here. Hmm.I did buy a tuned HW95L in .25 awhile back for my brother. It’s definitely capable with the 20.14 FTT but it can’t match my 52 .25; hence why I want a tuned 80.
I don’t think I would enjoy a 90 as the gas rams I’ve tried (Scirroco, Benjamin Trail) weren’t to my liking. Seemed too snappy and weird in hold sensitivity.
That 95 is probably only sending 20.14’s at estimated 565 if I remember correctly.
Ya guys should try the 16.54 GTO’s from your .25 springers. I need to also lol. I haven’t because 25.43 are too heavy, smell it dieseling. The 20.14 are on top one another, I stopped testing and bought a case, but now I want to try the 16.54 GTO’s. They penetrate extremely well in .22 from R1