CO2 vs. PCP Airguns: Pros and Cons for Beginner and Veteran Airgunners

[JustNeedORingSize]

Hello fellow airgun enthusiasts,

I've been thinking a lot lately about the ongoing debate between CO2 and PCP airguns. I'm sure we all have our own thoughts and experiences on this topic and it would be enlightening to bring this discussion here.

Some folks swear by the convenience of CO2-powered guns, citing the ease of use and affordability as key points. They're generally seen as perfect for beginners but also have their place in the arsenal of more experienced shooters. On the other hand, PCP airguns, with their higher power, more consistent performance, and potential for better accuracy, are often viewed as the "step up" in the world of airgunning. Yet, they come with the need for specific filling equipment and maintenance.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. Let's consider:

1. If you are a beginner, which type of airgun would you start with and why?
2. For the veterans, do you prefer CO2 or PCP airguns? And why?
3. How does the cost factor into your decision?
4. For those who have tried both, what are the notable differences you experienced?
5. Are there specific brands/models that you think are the best representation of CO2 and PCP airguns respectively?

Looking forward to a lively and respectful discussion.

 

[nervoustrig]

I would distinguish the two as follows. A good bit of overlap with how you've already summarized them, with a few additions.

CO2 is best suited for plinking and casual target practice at modest distances...say, out to 30 yards or so. Its convenience is the main advantage. Can be used for pest control (small mammals like chipmunks and squirrels and small birds) but not as reliable as air due to its temperature sensitivity and not as versatile due the power limitations of ~800psi and a heavier molecule.

PCP offers higher power, better accuracy at a distance, and temperature independence. The capacity to accelerate larger calibers/heavier projectiles to useful velocities for hunting and long-range shooting. One disadvantage is initial cost, both for a source of high pressure air but also the guns themselves tend to be more expensive. However the costs have come down a lot in recent years. Another disadvantage is higher complexity...generally more parts and more seals and more adjustments.

I use both but no question PCPs provide me with more enjoyment.

 

[WorriedMan]

JustNeed,
Doubt any lively discussion between PCP and CO2, more likely between PCP and Springer, most members, however, recognize the pros and cons of both platforms and leave well enough alone. While pumpers and CO2 are mentioned, majority of threads involve PCPs and Springers. A member queried the forum not long ago with a dilemma involving an elderly friend who wanted to defend her garden from pests but lacked physical strength to operate a springer, PCP pump or pumper. A CO2 Diana Chaser was suggested, so CO2 has its place, just the significant performance jump of a PCP, or Springer, puts these platforms front and center. WM