Why would you want to?? MS is FAAAAR superior in every aspect of air filtering. Good place to get it: https://www.deltaadsorbents.com/ Get 4A 8-12mesh. Same size as what's used in most filter cartridges.
Most dryers use Zeolite 13x molecular sieve. You could “salt” the Zeolite with a small amount of the color changing silica beads to make it easier to see when to change out the Zeolite.
From one of my previous posts.
Well, I could say because that’s what Joe B recommends. But I did some research and that’s what dive shops use in their filtration towers for moisture removal. Additionally, it has approx a 10 Angstrom pore diameter compared to 3A, 4A, or 5A which makes it more suitable for trapping water molecules.
Now for the science speak…
Molecular Sieve 13X is a multiple purpose, highly porous, high capacity alkali metal alumino-silicate in the spherical form. It is the sodium form of the Type X crystal structure with pore diameters of approximately 10Å. It can adsorb all molecules that can be adsorbed by 3A, 4A, and 5A molecular sieve. Type 13X molecular sieve can also adsorb molecules such as aromatics and branched-chain hydrocarbons, which have large critical diameters
This web page compares molecular sieve and silica gel in terms of their water absorption performance. It appears that molecular sieve is a better choice because of it's higher rate of absorption and absorption capacity at elevated temperature ( compressed air is hot ) : https://www.sorbentsystems.com/desiccants_charts.html
Regarding the concern over the release of acid by molecular sieve, I take it with a grain of salt. A common practice is to use another plastic tube to isolate the acid from the inner surface of the aluminium filter tube but my question is if acid is really produced, will it be possible for the acid to be carrying by the air flow to the unshielded parts of the filter tube such as the threads which is likely to be the first point of failure ? In my set up , the molecular sieve is allowed to come into direct contact with the inner surface of the filter tube and I am going to check the internals regularly to see if corrosion is a real problem.
Perhaps a more relevant concern is how tight the molecular sieve material is packed together. I am convinced that if there is too much space between the molecular sieve balls, the majority of air will just go around the balls instead of through them so the effectiveness of water absorption will be lower. At present I am using 13X balls of diameter 1.6 ~ 2.5 mm and it is possible to get smaller 5A balls of diameter 0.4 ~ 0.8 mm. I have not tried it yet because I am yet to come up with a way to objectively compare the results.
The 8x12 and even 4x 8 bead sizes are what is in commercial diving filter cartridges sold by Coltri, Bauer, etc..... A high pressure cartridge using a PMV will not channel any moisture around a packed filter without being adsorbed. . Channeling around beads is a fallacy created by the same vendor who created the acid eating desiccant scare story.
Am I the only one that noticed that the corrosion in the tube from the acid leaching is not a anodized tube....
Since the silica is less efficient than the molecular sieve, using it in with the sieve really only indicates the silica is full, not the sieve...So how do we know it’s time to change the sieve?
Should it be based on run time?