Hawke 4-16 x 44 mm IR, SF compact on HW95L using Hawke Tactical 2 piece medium rings leaves less than 1/8" clearance for objective lens.
Upvote 0
I'd never looked up the specs on that NF scope either. Really nice illuminated reticle! I could imagine that it would appeal to many air gunners, despite the 25 yd min parallax adjustment.
I'd never looked up the specs on that NF scope either. Really nice illuminated reticle! I could imagine that it would appeal to many air gunners, despite the 25 yd min parallax adjustment.
ToKeepAndBear,
I just checked out the NF 2.5-10×42 NXS you mentioned.
Looks like a great little scope! But did I see this correctly? It has a 25-yard minimum parallax?
I could live with 15y. With 20y not so much. 25y is totally out of the question.... — I'm bummed that so many scope manufacturers like NightForce disregard the needs of airgunners.....
Matthias
Patrick, I just noticed turret slot on my new Hawke Sidewinder the other day. I had heard about "slop" and wondered what all the fuss was about. I am new to airguns. When I caught the slop, then I realized how important not having it was. Thanks. S7Just wanted to share my journey down a similar road...
I had an ETR on my MKII (sold) and moved it to my Maverick for ELR from the bench (Fantastic scope!), all be it is the 4.5-30, and it weights in at 34oz, so not much different than your ETR 3-18, a bit heavy for the field. I knew I wanted an upgrade for the bench Maverick as well as a light weight fantastic scope for field work out to 100+- on the WC MK3, which left the ETR moving to the .25 DL Classic. Over the last 4 months I ordered 9 scopes I felt deserved my attention to test based on my research and some reliable hype from you all here.
Based onmy benchmark scope. Athlon Ares ETR 4.5-30x56 because it has “Wow” factor, a technical term you all know.
My personal criteria for each discipline, bench and field, are as follows.
- Lightest weight
- Smooth/Tactile hardware
- FFP
- 10-25yd parallax
- Uncluttered Mil reticle
- Excellent IQ for the money
- Low zoom 3-6
- High zoom 15-30
- Warranty
These are the scopes that made it to the test.
- Burris Extreme Tactical XTR III 3.3-18x50
- Hawke Frontier 30 4-20x50
- Athlon Midas Tac 6-24x50
- Trijicon Tenmile 3-18x44
- Athlon Ares BTR Gen2 4.5-27x50
- Crimson Trace Series 5 3-24x56
- Tract Toric 4-20x50
- Vortex Razor AMG 6-24x50
- Athlon Helos Gen2 2-12x42
My abbreviated high/low points on each are;
- Burris- Unreal glass! / All adjustment knobs are like a juice blender, Ouch!
- Hawke- Lightweight King! / Average IQ, hard to focus, turret slop.
- Midas Tac- Just average at best for the money.
- Trijicon- Lightweight, great reticle, great DOF / Short focal range.
- Ares BTR Gen2- So close to the ETR in many respects,but…/ it weights 6oz less and the cost difference is nill. Advantage goes to the ETR.
- Crimson- IQ was average for its price / Hardware feel was terrible, it was worth less than the discounted price IMO.
- Toric-Excellent eyebox, very good IQ / Heavy, turret caps were loose, CA was a bit high.
- Vortex AMG- Unreal on 95% of my criteria / Slightly larger reticle for the zoom range would be nice.
- Helos- Athlon nailed it on so many levels, FOV,DOF,IQ,CA,Eyebox,Weight,Price point / Con? Only if you didn’t like the reticle, but give it a chance @ 50-150 yds and see.
As you might have noticed the Vortex AMG and Athlon Helos are the two that checked my boxes enough to keep and are on their respective platforms.
I agree that any SWFA X by X would be a fantastic option.
The Athlon Helos 2-12x42 @ $499 must be experienced to truly appreciate regardless of the reticle (you will get use to it).
Enjoy your search.
Patrick
Patrick, bringing this old thread back up for a question. Had you ever given the Vortex Razor LHT FFP a test drive? Maybe not "compact" in terms of length, but the weight is about 20 oz. And its considerably less $$ than the AMG.Just wanted to share my journey down a similar road...
I had an ETR on my MKII (sold) and moved it to my Maverick for ELR from the bench (Fantastic scope!), all be it is the 4.5-30, and it weights in at 34oz, so not much different than your ETR 3-18, a bit heavy for the field. I knew I wanted an upgrade for the bench Maverick as well as a light weight fantastic scope for field work out to 100+- on the WC MK3, which left the ETR moving to the .25 DL Classic. Over the last 4 months I ordered 9 scopes I felt deserved my attention to test based on my research and some reliable hype from you all here.
Based onmy benchmark scope. Athlon Ares ETR 4.5-30x56 because it has “Wow” factor, a technical term you all know.
My personal criteria for each discipline, bench and field, are as follows.
- Lightest weight
- Smooth/Tactile hardware
- FFP
- 10-25yd parallax
- Uncluttered Mil reticle
- Excellent IQ for the money
- Low zoom 3-6
- High zoom 15-30
- Warranty
These are the scopes that made it to the test.
- Burris Extreme Tactical XTR III 3.3-18x50
- Hawke Frontier 30 4-20x50
- Athlon Midas Tac 6-24x50
- Trijicon Tenmile 3-18x44
- Athlon Ares BTR Gen2 4.5-27x50
- Crimson Trace Series 5 3-24x56
- Tract Toric 4-20x50
- Vortex Razor AMG 6-24x50
- Athlon Helos Gen2 2-12x42
My abbreviated high/low points on each are;
- Burris- Unreal glass! / All adjustment knobs are like a juice blender, Ouch!
- Hawke- Lightweight King! / Average IQ, hard to focus, turret slop.
- Midas Tac- Just average at best for the money.
- Trijicon- Lightweight, great reticle, great DOF / Short focal range.
- Ares BTR Gen2- So close to the ETR in many respects,but…/ it weights 6oz less and the cost difference is nill. Advantage goes to the ETR.
- Crimson- IQ was average for its price / Hardware feel was terrible, it was worth less than the discounted price IMO.
- Toric-Excellent eyebox, very good IQ / Heavy, turret caps were loose, CA was a bit high.
- Vortex AMG- Unreal on 95% of my criteria / Slightly larger reticle for the zoom range would be nice.
- Helos- Athlon nailed it on so many levels, FOV,DOF,IQ,CA,Eyebox,Weight,Price point / Con? Only if you didn’t like the reticle, but give it a chance @ 50-150 yds and see.
As you might have noticed the Vortex AMG and Athlon Helos are the two that checked my boxes enough to keep and are on their respective platforms.
I agree that any SWFA X by X would be a fantastic option.
The Athlon Helos 2-12x42 @ $499 must be experienced to truly appreciate regardless of the reticle (you will get use to it).
Enjoy your search.
Patrick
So, I am not the only one that likes them........I am going to go way against the grain here but I recently just bought a UTG Bugbuster 3-12x32 for my off hand shooting Caiman and I am THOROUGHLY impressed with it for $125 price tag that included QD pic rings. I also run a TS12x from USO on my supervet.
So, I am not the only one that likes them........
I have a few of the etched reticle 3-12 UTG compacts and they are tough little units. They are not fancy schmancy, the reticle is not the finest, the turrets are not butter smooth, but they hold zero and keep on keeping on after several years.
Good call man!
BKL got me where I needed to be for offset.I love it, it is actually what I would call PERFECT for the rifle I put it on and I have no desire to change it, I may use different rings at some point because I would like the scope to sit further back so I am researching some different two piece cantilever options.
GreetingsPatrick, bringing this old thread back up for a question. Had you ever given the Vortex Razor LHT FFP a test drive? Maybe not "compact" in terms of length, but the weight is about 20 oz. And its considerably less $$ than the AMG.