I’m not familiar with FT or HFT and I’m not a competition shooter, I do it for sheer pleasure. It’s like golf, me against the golf course and shooting is me against the equipment/components I have. And the Impact is kind of like developing a new cast bullet load for a powder burner rifle, the combinations are almost endless. Holy cow I’ve burned up a lot of primers and powder the past couple of years doing this… I’ll be shooting a lot of pellets now too.Indeed FT folks want the most accurate and consistent guns. FX guns are designed to be most modular, adjustable and tunable guns in the works so the perception of not as consistent is pretty strong. This is in part the gun is very easy to be “screwed up” by the user and the urge to change things up by the owner. I do have my crown setup for HFT and it’s very accurate and consistent, I do see others have good success with FX in HFT. If tuned correctly they are very accurate and consistent even with 177, at least the 2 FX in 177 I own are. If you are in norcal and thing FX can’t make accurate 177 is more than welcome to try my crown.
Keep in mind FT has 2 main styles: american HFT or bucket and sticks and WFTF/open or on the ground with no sticks. The 12 FPE WFTF class is where most of the world compete in and it requires highly adjustable ergonomics. Plus weight up to a point is our friend so FX guns being light weight actually works against them. Plus FX does not make a WFTF specific chassis/stock as they are not interested in such small market.
@450BM great shooting! While the gun is clearly very accurate but to be able to shoot those groups consistently requires excellent marksman’s skills.
Thank you for the compliment but this gun really gets the credit as it’s easy to shoot well. I thought the triggers on my Maruader and FWB 124 were good, and they are, but compared to the trigger on the Impact they are just mediocre.
Upvote 0