Cricket mini carbine compared to Vulcan tactic, real life

[oldsparky]

Morning, I am interested in some specs I haven't found to compare both of these. Anyone know these specs. in 22 cal. As Bought.

Fill Pressure 

Shot count

Weight ( seems I have found conflicting weights)

(I know this is subjective) Loud or quiet?

thanks, Jim

 

[Oregun]

Hey Jim, I'm pretty sure Mick has both guns and can help answer your questions. He's a good guy and a great resource!

Here's his handle: Mick-VA

 

[Centercut]

I have both, but my Tactic is a .25. I think the .22 Cricket mini and .22 Vulcan Tactic are very similar and you can’t go wrong with either. The Cricket is lighter and quieter. The Vulcan shoots harder (higher FPS). I like the Cricket mags better. Both very accurate. Triggers similar, but the Cricket can be adjusted to be "Taipan great", and no matter how much you adjust the Vulcan it will always have just a bit of creep before it breaks. Shot count similar. Vulcan nicer stock and better looking. Both very easy to work on. With either gun you could reseal every o-ring in an hour. But, if I had to keep only one it would be the Cricket mini. 

 

[socaloldman]

+1 for Centercut's opinion. Cannot overstate the distinct advantage the Cricket has in the magazine department. Best, simple, low cost, high count easy load mags.

 

[oldsparky]

thanks for the info. I am on the fence. thank you