Daystate Wolverine shooters?

Last time I posted, I wrote that I had narrowed my choices to three guns, all in 25cal- Daystate Huntsman, Weihrauch HW100, or the BSA R10. A few of you chimed in and offered that they were good guns, but that since they were not originally designed for 25cal, they would be both a bit anemic in fpe and be limited to fewer shots per fill in comparison to other guns. So I went back to the drawing board. The Daystate Red Wolf seems like a contender, but it has more bells and whistles than I am honestly looking for. That leaves the Daystate Wolverine. The Youtube video I watched on it, made by Airguns of Arizona, put a Wolverine in 177cal through some tests, but they were by no means fully comprehensive in their evaluation. I'd be very grateful to any Wolverine owners who have a Wolverine in either 22cal or 25cal to give their two cents on this gun. Do you get a good number of shots per fill? What pellets in general(besides JSB's) do they prefer? Does it lend itself to the heavier projectiles? How well does this gun compare to the Air Arms s510 extra fac? Thank you in advance for your responses.
 
I own the Wolverine B in .22 that I bought 3 years ago from AOA. They sold me a Aztec Emerald 5.5 X 25 to go with it. Couldn't be happier with it. Shooting the jsb exact 18.13 pellets. I take out chipmunks at 50/60 yards all day long. Long as I don't have to rush the shot, I don't miss. Flyers are very, very rare. Gun is very simple and very easy to clean. Very quiet. The only thing that bothered me is that the large focus wheel for the scope got in the way of the magazine @ reload time. Couldn't use it. Until, that is, I machined one of the spokes out of the wheel and when I reinstalled it I set the missing spoke over the magazine when the scope was at a 50 yard setting. So now I have the large wheel and can reload the gun. Never did any shooting of groups @ targets but a pile of dead chipmunks speaks for itself. No more chewed up truck wires. I think the newer ones have some nice upgrades over mine. The regulated side lever option is something I wish mine had. But either way, I'm pleased.

Hope this helps

John
 
I have a Wolverine R in .22 that I ordered this past year just before the major price increase. It has been a fine rifle and I enjoy shooting it. I find that it shoots both 16 and 18 grain pellets well, but doesn't perform quite the same with the heavier 25.4 grain pellets. But that's fine with me because I think the 30 fpe version is better suited to lighter projectiles.. Typically, the groups I shoot in my back yard range (just about 30 yards) are nice and small. Not pellet on pellet, but a ragged hole. I'd like to tell you that I've had really small groups at 50 yards, but I'm always battling the wind where I shoot at longer ranges and haven't had much luck. That doesn't mean that it won't perform at that distance, it just means that I'm still not that great at reading the wind. By the way, I usually fill to 250 bar and easily end up with over a hundred shots before falling off the regulator.

I can't tell you how the rifle compares to an AA S510, but I do have an older AA S410 that has always worked very well. Keeping in mind that this is the older bolt action gun, the Wolverine is a nicer more refined product. But...in terms of accuracy? I have to say they're roughly equivalent.

As it appears in photographs, the rifle looks heavy, but in one's hands, it feels notably light and maneuverable. The stock is comfortable, and the adjustable buttpad will help align your eye with the scope. This is somewhat of an important consideration because you're going to need high scope rings to clear the magazine. I initially had super high rings, but found them to be a bit too much. That said, it's all kind of a function of what type of scope you use and where it sits on the rifle in relation to your eye.

Had the prices not shot up astronomically, I might have bought the HP version as a companion piece even though I think the longer barrel is a bit ungainly looking, but that extra $600 increase dissuaded me pretty easily. Honestly, I can see an increase of a hundred, maybe 200 bucks, but $600? No thanks.

I bought the grey laminated version because I didn't want to play ugly walnut stock roulette. Don't get me wrong, I really like the way the grey laminate looks, but a friend has a the same rifle stocked in a nice piece of walnut, and I must admit to being a bit envious. Had I gone the HP route, I think I would have gone with the Forester stock. A noteworthy benefit of laminated stocks is that I believe they weather the rough handling of various shippers better than walnut.

The beauty of the Daystate Wolverine is that it is a rifle made to take out and shoot. You don't fiddle with anything. Obviously you can adjust the trigger to your liking, but I found mine to be just about right from the factory.

The bottom line is that it's a quality rifle put together by one of the best names in the business and I don't think you'll regret your purchase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: keith1
Although the WOLVERINE can be tuned it's a stripdown, as above definitely go for the HP version in .25, the 510 doesn't have the power to handle the 34g pellets and lacks power in every model IMO.

The .22 WOLVERINE is a bit of a mixed bag as well, you are stuck with one power level unless you strip and tune, whereas the REDWOLF is so much more versatile and really simple to use, three power levels at a press of the trigger can cover .25 & 34g pellets and or slugs no problem, even the lead free pellets work if you drop the power down enough, dont be intimidated by the REDWOLF you will love it!

The .22 barrels on both the REDWOLF and WOLVERINE are the same and they shoot the H&N 21g BARRACUDA MATCH and the new 18g BARRACUDA brilliantly, .25 is a different story however, H&N slugs in 34 & 36g .2505 shoot really well in the DAYSTATE .25 barrels, I am currently playing with H&N slugs upto 40g in the .22 DAYSTATE barrels.

Hope this helps (or not LOL).
 
The Wolverine is a well made rifle, and if it suits your needs as-is, it might be a good rifle for you. I tried one, but the stock fit just wasn't right for me, and I returned it. I have a Revere in .22, and although lacking a little in power and shot count, it is a very good rifle and I enjoy it. But, as mentioned above, these rifles are a major pain for tuning, unless you have a shop and knowledge level above the average owner (and are willing to sacrifice the warranty). I think if I were interested in a .25, I would look at something simpler and more flexible in its tuning potential. RAW, Taipan Veteran, and Royale 500 come to mind, assuming pellet use, slugs are a different ball game and I have no experience. 

Ed
 
When we attended the Daystate Owners event by AoA, my wife absolutely fell in love with the Wolverine in 22. Since I work with them on various things, we went down to the shop where she spent the day shooting them and ended up choosing a 177 in walnut for FT. It is a WONDERFUL rifle in about every way. We like very light triggers and it took me a bit of time to find a recipe for light but reliable but nothing else has been done to it but cleaning the barrel. It's a phenomenal shooter.

Fast forward a bit and a couple of friends have picked up higher powered versions. They shoot extremely well but do have some limitations that may be important. The 22 HP is only good for 45 ft lb because of a small plenum. I've tuned on it as well as others and going over that results in a lot of wasted air with little power increase. It shoots extremely well but that's it for power. In 25, it might do a little better but I would expect 33.4s to not be an option. As a side effect, the trigger is heavier and doesn't seem to be able to make lighter than 8 oz or so. This may be good enough for a lot of people, but we like them finer. Those are the only nits I can pick on this fine rifle.

As Spray1Mark mentions, for the price difference , the Red Wolf is a BIG jump in power and versatility with the addition of a pretty fine trigger. The slickness of operation is a spoiler as well. The electronics are well proven and all about this rifle is impressive.

Just my $0.02

Bob
 
I love the Wolverine .22. Mine is an older generation non-regulated model. Feels great in the hand with the thumb hole stock, well balanced and quiet enough in a urban setting for backyard plinking. Excellent accuracy and power throughout the green and yellow range on the gauge. Nice trigger feel too. I looked at several other rifles including the HW100 and a huntsman but the Wolverine seemed the tick the most boxes. Good luck with your choice.