Possibly low sales, more popularity of the break barrel models.???!!! Any details as to why?
Could be that production costs have outgrown sales growth due to inflation also.
But maybe I will make a post for this in the industry section
Upvote 0
Possibly low sales, more popularity of the break barrel models.???!!! Any details as to why?
Yeah I think the “benchrest” crowd are the only ones interested in these side levers now that PCPs are becoming the norm.In my opinion, I think the Diana 54 and the 56 are the popular ones with the sliding sled that absorbs the recoil?
Those two models are beautiful but are a huge heavy built gun.
I am glad your local distributor is doing the right thing.Hi everyone. I contacted Remes, the Diana importer in Finland, and they reached out to the factory.
A new Diana 48 is on its way!
I asked for a .22 model but I’ll take whatever shows up.
Thanks again everyone, for all the support!
I am truly thankful to still have all my digits. I just hope this was a fluke, for all the other fingers out there.Reading this was a shock, plain and simple. Complete equipment failure due to zero user error, with potential to permanent, debilitating injury. Airgunning doesn't get any chillier than that, even in Antarctica.
Sidelever Dianas are among my main guns, and I too shoot in freezing temps, because c. 1/3 of each year around here deals with those realities. There are endless thousands of airgunners who simply cannot choose not to shoot in freezing temperatures. It's the coldest time of year that hunting seasons are in, for one huge reason.
A HW97 isn't really a substitute for a sidelever Diana. They are in a completely different power category, with the Dianas producing about 50% more KE, or shooting mid-weight, high-BC .22 cal pellets at close to optimal velocity for multi-range accuracy. The big Dianas are singular precisely because they offer high power and high accuracy in the same package, while weighing no more than the mid-power underlever Weihrauchs.You can't go wrong with a Weihrauch......I have a HW97KT and I really like it.
Pretty typical of a fatigue loading failure. The damage is done slowly over time. Until finally a straw breaks the camel’s back.What's striking in this disaster is the fact that the cocking lever base sheared off when the cocking stroke wasn't even at the first anti-beartrap notch…
You’re not wrong. I ended up with the 48 for most of the reasons you listed.A HW97 isn't really a substitute for a sidelever Diana. They are in a completely different power category, with the Dianas producing about 50% more KE, or shooting mid-weight, high-BC .22 cal pellets at close to optimal velocity for multi-range accuracy. The big Dianas are singular precisely because they offer high power and high accuracy in the same package, while weighing no more than the mid-power underlever Weihrauchs.
I personally couldn't stand the awkward, unintuitive, un-resettable HW safety, while the Diana safety is just how a safety should be. That is an often overlooked feature. I also wouldn't want the 4-kilo penalty with a measly 20J at the muzzle. Few people carry the HW97 into the woods, for a reason.
Wow. Since no one here, including Hector, has ever seen this before I think it’s safe to say it was a fluke. Glad you weren’t hurt and glad they’re sending you a new one.I am truly thankful to still have all my digits. I just hope this was a fluke, for all the other fingers out there.
HMMM maybe a little cart ? Golf bag cart ?Yeah I think the “benchrest” crowd are the only ones interested in these side levers now that PCPs are becoming the norm.
I bet the model 350 and 460 also had something to do with the decline of the 48 and 52.
I got the 48 because it was pretty much the only side lever light enough to carry. It may not be light, but it’s certainly lighter than a 54.
I think the rise of PCPs is eroding the magnum springer market.
I wasn't trying to compare the two rifles? I have both and like them both very much.A HW97 isn't really a substitute for a sidelever Diana. They are in a completely different power category, with the Dianas producing about 50% more KE, or shooting mid-weight, high-BC .22 cal pellets at close to optimal velocity for multi-range accuracy. The big Dianas are singular precisely because they offer high power and high accuracy in the same package, while weighing no more than the mid-power underlever Weihrauchs.
I personally couldn't stand the awkward, unintuitive, un-resettable HW safety, while the Diana safety is just how a safety should be. That is an often overlooked feature. I also wouldn't want the 4-kilo penalty with a measly 20J at the muzzle. Few people carry the HW97 into the woods, for a reason.
I think he has a good point that there isn’t really a replacement for the Diana side levers if they go away.I wasn't trying to compare the two rifles? I have both and like them both very much.
My wife can't cock the HW97 because it is all or nothing with no beartrap but she is more accurate shooting with the HW97. Nothing wrong with the safety in my opinion either. Different strokes!
I too have a Diana 48 in .177 which is why I was interested in this article. I bought mine for the power and accuracy it afforded me.Sounds like a good solution for an excellent airgun, bigger than mine, I have a 48.
My 48 is for sale too, Nikon scope and soft case included, if you know of anyone looking. Apparently I can't post until 10 days goes by as I'm a new member.I too have a Diana 48 in .177 which is why I was interested in this article. I bought mine for the power and accuracy it afforded me.