RWS Did i find a gem ? Rws 38

Read some posts about the Diana 38 and low and behold one just happened to find me at a local pawnshop. I'm not really a break barrel fan , thank you walmart specials. But I am a Diana rws fan and have had afew side lever and some knock offs.. still waiting for that 54 to fall in my lap so in the mean time thought I would try this . It does shoot and feels good , very tame. Haven't had a chance to sight it in or chronograph it. It's thumping my steel targets pretty hard my guess around 800 fps mid 700 maybe . Better trigger than I expected also . Not sure which one it is but I know it's not the t1. When it warms up a bit ill put it to paper and fps.

20250108_121829.jpg


20250108_121441.jpg


20250108_121454.jpg


20250108_121437.jpg
 
yes i nice rifle but it needs to get out of the stock and the tooth brush and something like Break Free, rust even a little is bad
now there seems to be one thing it has the wrong stock from all the other picture i have seen now that doesn't mean they didn't change to another stock but some more looking would be needed or someone in the know
thumbnail_IMG_5007.jpg

catalog picture
 
  • Like
Reactions: FWB127 and Bandito
I've seen 2 different stocks on the 38... not sure of vintages.
I've been kind of keeping an eye out for the one that looks like a checkered walnut 36 but have yet to run across one that I was sure was the right one.
Yours doesn't look like walnut to me in the pics, but I could be way off.
Decent shooters usually... a deluxe version of the 34 but upgraded sights and checkered walnut stock with butt pad.
Congrats on acquiring it and good luck...
Bob
 
The 38s were produced in at least 2 different stock shapes (as mentioned and pictured above); and the slim stock was produced in 'walnut stained' beech, and actual walnut.

Having wanted a walnut-stocked 38 for years, I finally purchased a beech-stocked one in the heavier profile. I liked it enough to not only install a Maccari spring and piston seal, but also chop the barrel shorter and add an alloy muzzle weight (to complete the aesthetics, more than any other reason). Now I really love it! 🥰

Diana 38K.jpg


Lovely Di is a pretty strong shooter, and very accurate. Doing almost all my sproinger shooting from the Hunter Field Target position (from stool and bipod), she groups as well as any of my other nice sproingers (.22 Air Arms Pro Sport, .22 Beeman R-9, .177 HW77K, and FWB 124; all but the PS with aftermarket springs). I get consistent 3/4" to 1" five-shot groups at 50 yards, regular as clockwork. Here are my testing notes on Lovely Di-

8.4 grain FX, with Maccari spring and seal, 20 shot string- Low= 861, High= 872, ES= 11, SD= 3, Avg= 865 FPS/14.0 FPE

.
 
Last edited:
What is the date stamp on the gun? It should be in very small characters, MM YY format, on the left rear of the receiver tube. It looks to me like a first-generation one (early 1980's) the bent-strip safety gives it away. This basic action was the same as the also new model 34, but with more deluxe stock and a proper scope rail (the first 34's had awful short crimped grooves). As noted above the 38 was a bit of a chameleon over time.

The gun DOES have the "T01" trigger - which is a misnomer. Diana uses the "T" markings to refer to ANY change in the action, NOT just triggers. On this family of designs, the first-gen guns quickly got some minor tweaks (including, ironically, a scope rail) that required the T01 mark - but the trigger did NOT change. The early guns are rare, so the initial trigger is indeed mostly seen on guns with the T01 mark; but if you will forgive my annoying pedantry, technically there is no such thing as a "T01 trigger."

This trigger is basically the classic Diana "ball sear" type used on the models 25D, 27, 35, and 50 from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, but modified to fit in a self-contained module and with a safety added. It has an excellent pull and is much easier to service than the original ball sear.

Just to confuse matters even further...the later T05 and T06 stamps on 34-based actions DO refer to trigger re-designs. (I have no idea what T02, T03, and T04 were, but I suspect they relate to the similar, smaller models 26 and 24 that were released at the same time.)

This pic is from RWS Catalog no. 4, the first to show the model 34 and its relatives.

IMG_8007.jpeg
 
Last edited:
What is the date stamp on the gun? It should be in very small characters, MM YY format, on the left rear of the receiver tube. It looks to me like a first-generation one (early 1980's) the bent-strip safety gives it away. This basic action was the same as the also new model 34, but with more deluxe stock and a proper scope rail (the first 34's had awful short crimped grooves). As noted above the 38 was a bit of a chameleon over time.

The gun DOES have the "T01" trigger - which is a technical misnomer. Diana uses the "T" markings to refer to ANY change in the action, NOT just triggers. On this family of designs, the first-gen guns quickly got some minor tweaks (including, ironically, the scope rail!) that required the T01 mark - but the trigger did NOT change. It's an understandable mis-direction since the early guns are rare, so the initial trigger is indeed mostly seen on guns with the T01 mark.

The trigger is basically the classic Diana "ball sear" type used on the models 25D, 27, 35, and 50 from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, but modified to fit in a self-contained module. It has an excellent pull and is much easier to service than the original ball sear.

Just to confuse matters even further...the later T05 and T06 stamps DO refer to trigger re-designs (and I have no idea what T's 02, 03, and 04 were)!
View attachment 527353
04 86 thank you for the info . The trigger is a plastic one thats different then the others I've delt with.
 
This a Diana Mod 38 'Firebird' with the T01 trigger. Was an absolute rusty mess when I found it, hence the polished finish.

Screenshot_20250109_064513_Gallery.jpg


Nothing special about the Firebird apart from the gold Firebird badge in the pistol grip. Apart from it suffering from a fairly substantial amount of barrel droop, these are great guns, and one of the few over here that could (almost) compete with the HW80.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pea-shooter O.G.