Experimenting with my new Avenger

Hello. I've added a new hobby by jumping into the PCP world. I've had a few airguns in the past, but this is the first PCP. I chose the bullpup in .22, and added a DonnyFL FX.

PXL_20221210_214637159 (1).jpg


I'm one of those strange analytical type people, and for me experimenting and fiddling is a huge part of the fun. I'm new to PCP, but not to firearms, and I already had a chronograph so I started immediately. I don't expect much of what I am doing is novel, but since I am doing it and analyzing the results, I figured I would share. I appologize now for my tendency to be longwinded.

While I do have a science background, I am in no way an expert on this, so some of my ideas/conclusions may be way off. They are just how my thoughts are going with what I am seeing. Please chime in if you have a more accurate understanding.

I should also explain that I am frugal by nature. Being frugal, I don't shoot my firearms as much as I would like because of the cost, hence some of my interest in PCP's. Being frugal, I am also interested in what I can do with readily available and cheap 14.3gr Crosman Premier pellets (I like that I can get them at any Walmart). This at least will be my starting point. I may end up trying nicer and heavier pellets or slugs later, but all that I show here is with 14.3gr Crosman Premier (and shot indoor). I will probably also do much of my shooting in my yard, so not much longer than 25 yards typically.

Out of the box, the regulator appears to be set to 2900-3000 (hard to tell exactly). This seemed a bit higher than I expected, but that's where it was. Later checking found the hammer spring to be ~1.75 turns clockwise from the lowest setting. After shooting a few strings, I filled it to ~4200 psi and recorded a string down to ~800 psi. These were done in 10 shot strings and I checked the fill pressure after each.

out of the box.png


The pressure estimation is an extrapolation from the reading after each 10 shot string. I found it interesting that it was a very consistent pressure drop per shot (25-30 PSI per). The other ting I found that surprised me was the how consistent the shots were even after the pressure was below the regulator setting. The first 45 or 46 shots should have been on the regulator (~2950 PSI). After the fill pressure dropped below that there were another 30 shots before the FPS started dropping. My assumption from this was that "overgassed" (not sure what the proper term is), by which I mean that a good bit of the air released for each shot is not actually being used to accelerate the pellet (perhaps being expended after the pellet has left the barrel). Assuming that this is true, I am potentially loosing efficiency (and shots). Over that string of 75 shots, I averaged 1004 FPS and 32 FT-LBS, which is more than I think I would want to shoot for. I'm thinking upper 800's and around 25 FT-LBS with 14.3 gr pellets would be a good area to aim for.

Before messing with the regulator, I wanted to see what I could do with the hammer spring adjustment. Maybe it would be possible to get back the inefficiency by dropping the hammer spring tension (and not releasing more air than is used to accelerate the pellet). Checking what it was set to out of the box, it was ~1.75 turns (from all the way counter-clockwise). Here is what I got (10 shot groups at each setting).

hammer adj.png


It looks like dropping the hammer tension, isn't gaining me back the wasted air pressure (at least not entirely), since we are dropping in FPS with any adjustment down. Adjusting the FPS downward is good, my guess is that even if I went down to 0.5 turns (920 average FPS). I would still find that the shot string may stay level even after the pressure dropped below the regulator setting (wasting air pressure presumably at higher pressures). Next step - adjusting the regulator!

I figured I would start out with AEAC's "eco tune" (1400 PSI, 1.5 turns on the hammer spring). AEAC's video is awesome by the way. This is where things started to be a little strange.

I followed the instructions on adjusting the regulator down (degassed and turned clockwise to the limit and back 1/4 turn. When I pumped up the gun again, this gave me a regulator pressure of ~1900 PSI. Not knowing exactly how the regulator adjustment works, I don't want to try to back up that 1/4 turn more, so I started me experiments with the regulator at 1900. Does anyone know how I would actually go lower?

I decided to try different hammer spring settings at this new regulator pressure, and got the opposite of what I expected (10 shot groups at each HS setting).

hammer adj round 2.png


This was opposite of what I expected, and I will admit I checked the manual multiple time to make sure I was not getting my hammer adjustment backwards (I wasn't). I stopped for the day and looked at the data a bit. It seems to drift down steadily, with the hammer spring having no effect at all. Here is another view of all the shots.

hammer shot string.png


In this graph, I just show the data from all the shots, instead of binning them by hammer spring setting. It looks to me like the hammer spring setting has absolutely no effect, and the shot string is just decreasing downward at a steady rate. The vertical lines on the graph show where each 10 shot string ended (and the hammer was adjusted). This also showed what assume is the regulator creep. The first shot in every magazine is the highest FPS, sometimes with a very noticeable jump. I assume that this is a creep up in pressure in the time I take to save my chronograph data, reload magazines, check pressures, etc. Is this worse creep that people normally see? I noticed that when the out-of-the-box regulator setting was used (~2950), I could check the gun after it sat overnight and the regulator pressure could be as high as 3200 (but drop back to the ~2950) after dry-fire).

To make sure this was not all some sort of mistake, repeated the experiment the next day, but used 5 shot groups and changed the hammer spring between 1 and 5 turns. (the last two shot strings were 10 shots at 0 and 1 turn on the hammer spring).

hammer adj round 3.png


hammer shot string 2.png


Effectively the same result. Hammer spring adjustment seems to have no effect, I see as steady decrease in FPS, with an even more notable spike in the first shot of a string (after pause in shooting).

So, what are peoples thoughts?
- How would I get a regulator pressure below what I got (~1900) since I only turned out the adjustment the 1/4 turn indicated in the instructions?
- Is there some sort of regulator issue here? More creep than normal?
- Is my Avenger just very unhappy at the lower regulator setting?

For what its worth (not much), all of this was done shooting inside and at 10 yards. No matter what the velocity of the pellet (1040 FPS or in the 600's when at low pressure), there was almost no POI shift (again though, this was only at 10 yards).

Thanks if you got this far, and hopefully someone found this interesting besides me.

TheQuietMan
 
I also am in the process of tuning one of these , only I am without the use of a Chronograph for now. I have been using group size as my feedback. I have found that groups tend to tighten up when on the reg and you can continue to get many shots after yet the group moves up and right.
There is a wealth of information here for your consideration. search hammer adjustment , there is a very well explained post by Gary from a few years ago that exactly explains what you are seeing with your findings.


 
TQM,
Greetings, please consider watching Casino7095's 3-part YouTube video series on the Avenger Bullpup .22, you'll gain helpful insights. WM
Thanks for the suggestion. I went ahead and watched them. Most of the things discussed I already had seen or read previously (I research a good bit before buying). I had been researching Avengers as a whole though, assuming the the guts were the same across the whole series. It was interesting to see that he also couldn't get as low on the reg with a bullpup as people seem to be able to with other variants. A little more searching found other examples of this. I wonder what's different about the bullpup that seems to limit it to 1700-1800 as the lowest set point? (the rifle version seems to commonly go down to 1200).
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsfrid
Well, I ran a little more careful experiment today. I left the regulator where it was as well as the hammer spring at 1.5 turns out (though the last test seemed to indicated hammer spring setting wasn't having much effect). This time I did a full shot string and recorded not only the fill pressure, but also the regulator pressure reading. These readings were taken at the very start (after one dry-fire to get rid of the overnight creep), and then immediately after each 10 shot group. I also ran a timer between each 10 shot group, and waited exactly 2 min before starting the next group (during that time I saved the chronograph data on the 10 shot string, recorded both pressure gauge readings, and reloaded my magazine. Here is what I got:

shot string (reg 1700).png


As last time, I approximated the individual pressure readings by evenly splitting out the pressure lose per shot across the 10 shot groups (readings were only taken between groups). Once again, the fill pressure drop was very linear, generally between 25-30 PSI drop per shot. Unfortunately, I also saw a steady drop in the regulator pressure, meaning that I have "creep" that is pressure related (i.e. as the fill pressure decreases, so does the regulator pressure). The time creep is also there, not only overnight pressure rise, but also within 2 minutes between shots. I doubt I could see it on the regulator gauge (its hard to get very accurate readings when the gauge "ticks" are 200 PSI). What I do distinctly see is a pretty consistent 20-30 FPS increase for the first shot after a 2 minute wait, which is presumably due to a small increase in regulator pressure (creep) over the 2 minutes. (my chronograph tells me that within my 10 shot group, I am taking 5-8 sec per shot).

Looking back, I am not sure I can accurately say what the regulator "settings" have been. By this I mean that I have used only two settings (factory and all the way down and back 1/4), I just don't know what to name them pressure wise. I now know there is creep over time (I have seen overnight swing of 400+ PSI), but it looks like I also have creep over fill pressure ranges too.

I've tried to reach out to Air Venturi to see what they have to say, but haven't heard back yet. My main questions are 1) Is there a reason why the bullpup cannot have its regulator set as low as the other variants (1200 PSI)? Using 14.3 gr pellets, I was hoping to use my regulator more down toward 1400 PSI like AEAC's "eco" tune. 2) What can be done about the time and pressure creep? I assume they are related. Overnight creep can be handled with a dry-fire or two, but noticeable creep within 2 minutes causes a more difficulty to correct for issue, and creep over the fill pressure range means that the FPS will always have a downward drift over a shot string which is what a regulator is supposed to stop.

TheQuietMan
 
In case anyone is interested in pellet traps, I had to upgrade mine. Previously I was using duct seal in a wooden box with a cut down clipboard to slid in and hold the target. It worked great for my previous airguns (Crosman 1322 and a Daisy 853 Sporter from the Civilian Marksmanship Program), and I had used it for the last 8 years or so without issue. Neither airgun is a powerhouse, but the 853 is more accurate than I am at 10m. :) With these, the pellets barely embedded in the duct seal and were easy to remove when cleaning.

PXL_20221218_025406706 (1).jpg
PXL_20221218_025427226 (1).jpg


It still worked with the Avenger (out of the box doing ~32 FT-LBS), but only by a hair. The pellets stopped almost through the duct seal I had there. I had to space my shots because I didn't want a follow-up shot to hit the same hole. I could add more duct seal, but it would be a huge pain to clean out the pellets when they bury themselves so deep. I decided to try the rubber mulch style trap. I made mine out of a 5 gallon bucked with a wooden frame added to the top that 8.5x11 printed targets can slip into. Once $6 bag of rubber mulch from Lowes almost perfectly filled the 5 gallon bucket. At first I used an old t-shirt stretched under the lid to hold in the rubber mulch. The t-shirt got ripped up pretty quickly, so I am now trying foam cutouts from anti-fatigue mats from HF. So far it works very well and is holding up nicely to 130 shot strings all hitting the same place.

PXL_20221218_025649950 (1).jpg
PXL_20221218_025506298 (1).jpg
PXL_20221218_025444619 (1).jpg


And yes, that target is setup in my closet. It's 10 yards exactly through the master bedroom and bathroom and into the closet. My wife is understanding of my silliness (I got lucky in marriage).

TheQuietMan
 
TQM,
Starting out, decided a synthetic-stocked, regulated PCP in .25 was for me. Research indicated the Umarex Gauntlet fit the bill, as the Benjamin Marauder (unless more expensive Field and Target Model) wasn't regulated, and horror stories about regulator problems and leaks with the Air Venturi Avenger kept me away. While Avenger leaks and regulator concerns are much diminished, they still seem to struggle. Pretty sure reaching out to Air Venturi is an effort in futility, best advice would be to research forum archives for threads by members who've invested time and funds into upgrades. Please note many long-time members have moved on from "starter" PCPs so interest in your research might be lighter than hoped, don't discourage, newer members will appreciate. WM
 
Tom,

My Avenger is the original plastic stock full length model in 25 caliber. I detuned it before shooting it, I expected it to have the regulator set unreasonably high. I think I set the regulator like you did, just a bit off the lowest, and it was about 1500 psi. Worked fine at that point, I was getting about 850 fps on H&N FTT pellets which are 20 grain, light for a 25. My gun doesn't really like H&Ns, however. It shoots almost anything made by JSB well, however. I use FX 25.4 grain with the regulator set at about 2100 for about 930 fps. That is probably too fast. I will probably turn the regulator down but might just switch to 33.95 grain JSBs. I did not find that accuracy was very dependent on velocity. A pellet my gun liked at 700 fps it also liked at 900 fps. You can probably tell if Crosman 14.3s are a possibility without getting the tune sorted. But you may need to shoot at longer range - at least 25 yards. If you gun does not like them, it would seem to be a waste of time working out a tune for them.

I use that 14.3 Crosman in my Prod sometimes when I cannot find the H&N copper plated FTTs it prefers. But I personally think it's worth it to spend a little more to get better pellets. In my P35-177 I was thrilled to find it shot Crosman 10.5 grain just as well as H&N 10.65 grain. That was totally true for one tin of pellets. The next two tins shoot very poorly. I bought a head size gauge to try and figure it out and the two tins which don't shoot well have head sizes all throughout the range of the gauge. The one that shot well had much less variation and they were like the H&Ns. I am saying all this encourage you to consider other pellets. My Avenger was not very tolerant of pellets it didn't like and I think Crosmans vary too much tin to tin. OK for plinking or even short range hunting in my Prod but definitely not a target pellet. JSB offers a plastic "tin" of several of their pellets - an assortment. I got one for my P35-22 and the 18s shot pretty well but it shoots Baracuda Match, 21 grain, better (at 33 yards, at 25 they are about the same).

I don't understand why your velocity goes down with more hammer spring but it may be that your hammer spring is too forceful for your regulator setting. Your gun definitely seems unhappy at your current setting. If you are dead set on shooting light pellets from it I think your choices are to send it to Air Venturi under warranty for them to look at the regulator or changing to a lighter hammer spring to see if that works better. I would try some heavier pellets, like JSB 18 grain and/or H&N Baracudas either 18 grain or 21 grain with a little higher regulator setting (like maybe 1800). You will still have a long shot string. I've had zero success trying to get any of my guns to like pellets I wanted them to shoot. I think we have to find pellets our guns like. If I'm lucky they are cheap Crosmans but if they only like H&Ns or JSBs that is what they get. I use a pellet the gun will shoot between 800 and 900 fps these days before messing with the regulator setting. But that is in part because I'm shooting my P35s and the regulator is not as easy to change as it is on the Avenger. 1800 regulator setting may be over 900 fps on Crosmans 14.3s but my "solution" would be to use a heavier pellet - at least for some testing to get a handle on things. In short, my view is you are kind of fighting with your new gun instead of finding what it likes.
 
WorriedMan and JimD,

Thanks for the replies. I know that on a forum like this, you get a high proportion of serious enthusiasts, but I probably won't move past the "starter" gun level. If three decades of a firearm hobby is any indication, I'll never have the $1000+ airguns. I'm not the one at the range with the Cadillac of guns, let alone the supercar. I have what I see as good utility guns that fit my purpose, and I consider a good part of my hobby to be working on them. I have a 1911 that I have probably disassembled and worked on more than I have fired it. Its not that it didn't work perfectly, but I like trying to improve it with my own work. I could simply buy high end parts to improve it, or I can learn, smooth, and stone the parts I have for nothing but my labor. Some may say that that's a waste, and my labor has a cost too, but this is a hobby. If I enjoy the process, my labor is the hobby. If all I was concerned about was the value at the end, that would be a job (or a chore/task). Me "fighting" with my new airgun isn't a problem for me, its part of the appeal (I can work on something I find interesting and learn and improve it without having to spending much). I hope my posts have not come off complaining or viewing this as problems, tone is always hard to get right when writing. I'm still having fun unless there is something I can't get past and is something that I feel shouldn't be expected considering the price point.

As for using the Crosman Premiers, The are definitely not the ideal, but they are where I am starting. I know they will have their limitations, and may never be good at ranges past 40 yards (could be more, could be less, we'll have to see). This is a limitation I except for the price and convenience. I expect to work up a tune at some point for better and heavier pellets/slugs, but I also know that even if I do and can have much better range with them, I am still likely to shoot a lot more cheap pellets at 25 yards simply because that's the distance I can shoot easily where I live.

-----------end of rambling, back to experimenting------------

All that being said, I did do some more work and was much happier with the results. I figured that my Avenger may not be happy at the very bottom of its regulator, so I moved it up to 2000 PSI (as close as I could get). I let it sit overnight, and still saw some creep, but not as bad. After dry firing to get back to the setpoint (actually looked a little under 2000 PSI at this point), I put the hammer at the lowest setting (0 turns). I tested some and then refilled and ran a full string. This was done just like the last, 10 shot groups with a 2 minute pause between, recording both fill pressure and regulator pressure.

reg-1980 and hammer-0.png


The regulator does seem much happier. The first shot jump (after a 2 min pause) is completely gone, and the FPS are are more consistent (well under half the StdDev and spread I saw over the string when the regulator was at ~1700). The FPS are a little higher than I was hoping to try for (918 FPS average over 100 shots). I still do see some pressure related creep in the regulator pressure (not sure if this is normal or not - this is my first PCP). I do know that I would probably not notice an issue if I was not collecting all the data. It not quite as low a spread as AEAC's eco tune, but not bad, and still getting 100 shots even though the regulator pressure is 2000 PSI instead of 1400 PSI. If I didn't look at the regulator pressure dial, I would have assumed that I went off the regulator at 90 shots (fill pressure hit 2000 PSI). By that point in reality, the regulator pressure was below 2000 PSI due to the creep. I think that if I can somehow clean up a bit of the pressure creep (maybe clean up the delrin seal in the regulator), I might attenuate some of the downward drift in the shot string. I'm not going to mess with that yet however as to me at least this shot string seems reasonable. Not sure if I have settled on a new gun yet, but I think I have ~700 pellets through the gun so far (not bad for the first 10-15 days considering I am currently using a hand pump).

Next step - I need to see how accuracy is looking (all this was done indoors at only 10 yards). Whether it is accurate at 25+ yards will tell if this tune and Crosman Premier pellets are useful for me. If the ballistic calculators are correct, I think that 25 yard zero may be good for my needs (theoretically 2" or less in POI shift between 10 and 60 yard, with the "second" zero at ~50 yards). This may have to wait a little for warmer weather though...
 
I was not trying to be hypercritical with my "fighting" comment, only trying to say I think you were trying to make your gun do something it did not want to do. I'm glad a little higher regulator setting is working better and I hope you get a chance to check accuracy soon. I would like to do more shooting but it is just too cold here right now for it to be enjoyable. We're supposed to get back up in the 60s in about a week although it may be rainy then.

I have 4 regulated guns and 3 are P35s. All of my airguns cost less than $500. I like to tinker too. My P35-177 regulator behaves a bit like your Avenger. The velocity with 10.6 grain pellets goes from 895 with a full fill down to about 875 when it gets to the regulator setting. My other two P35s and my Avenger do not do this. I'm hoping that it gets better with time. The accuracy seems to have improved. I probably have a similar quantity of pellets through it as you do through your Avenger. I watch a sub 12 airgunner channel on youtube some and he takes regulators apart and smooths up the disks and puts graphite on them. I might do this at some point but am not anxious to get that seriously into a teardown over a ~35 ES. I do not hand pump any more, however. I bought a YH pretty quickly after getting my Avenger. I could do it but it was not fun to pump it several hundred times to get the pressure back up. Now I fill my 45 minute SCBA tank with the YH and my guns with the tank. I think this setup is ideal for me but it adds cost, of course.

I don't know what you think of your Avenger trigger but I was not very happy with mine until I put in a longer sear adjustment screw. I suspect the stock length of this screw was for liability reasons. With a longer screw I was able to get my Avenger to a one stage trigger which I prefer with a much lighter and cleaner break. It helps when accuracy testing. You have to be careful when reducing sear engagment, of course, or you may get a gun that won't cock or, even worse, a slam fire. Fortunately it is not hard to avoid these situations if you are careful.
 
So, it got warm enough to shoot outside today. I shot at 25 yards with a Leapers BugBuster 3-9X (its what I had, but I am planning on getting a budget FFP scope at some point). At 9X, I have a very strong suspicion that much of the spread can be blamed on me. I can see plenty of drift in my aim (from bench rest, but no sled or good bags). I'll have to get more stable setup to see if I can improve and go out further (didn't try past 25 yards today). All are 5 shot groups.

PXL_20221227_001901994 (1).jpg
PXL_20221227_001943561 (1).jpg
PXL_20221227_001955566 (1).jpg
 
For Crosman HPs those groups look pretty good to me. You might want to consider a bipod. They come at a wide range of prices. UTG makes a very inexpensive one (like $20) that doesn't have much adjustment but is pretty solid. I used it for awhile but ended up upgrading to about a $75 Amazon bipod. I also use a rear bag that I adjust for elevation with an air shim meant to be used hanging doors. My rear bag is in a home made open box with the shim under the bag.

I put a West Hunter 4-16 on my Avenger. Lots of features for the money, like the Avenger. 16X is still not enough for me for real serious bench shooting but I don't want any more magnification for hunting.
 
Thanks for the comments. Along with upgrading the scope eventually, I was also planning on getting a bipod and making one of the rear "squeeze" bags (e.g. https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1021656433).

For scopes, it sounds like you like your West Hunter? They seem to get at least some positive reviews here. I'm hoping for <$200 for FFP, side parallax, dialable turrets, and usably good glass. Obviously I don't expect it to be the same as >$1000 scopes, but good for the money. I've also see some suggest Discovery, and Sniper scopes (are there others?). I haven't had experience with any of these, but they all seem to have offering that fit my requirements.

I'm happy with 100 shots, I'll just have to see how much further it stays accurate. I'm not against opening up the regulator and trying to inspect or clean it up, but will wait a bit first (I assume it would void the warrantee).