I think i KNOW exactly what your referring to Dana. When I began slowly getting back into airguns as an adult I noticed a LOT of this myself.
It seemed that if you wanted quality you either ended up waiting on a custom build from a one off builder or the only alleged quality was with FX and Daystate. With most distributors giving a huge nod to Daystate.
Catching up to current times i feel with the invention of the Impact and high capacity magazine's that FX made some HUGE changes in their outreach and marketing to the SMALL group of online reviewers, testers, airgun channels etc.
As a business man I give FX huge marks for their accomplishment with taking over the online world for pushing FX through all the most well known channels.
However SADLY their not being met with any similar competition from other companies. I don't see anyone else putting everyone on the payroll and under contracts with regards to verbiage , testing, etc.
It really creates a CONFUSING and often misleading online world for those trying to find HONEST reviews and REAL WORLD experience.
I've seen guys well respected take guns and do test videos with bouncing bipods while testing accuracy and then think, "that would NEVER fly in an FX video" and often find myself wondering what prejudices are involved, what products can I trust, what reviewers can I actually trust knowing most are under contract and paid by FX.
I've actually been following you more lately Dana for this EXACT reason. I feel I get those most real world info with the least amount of bias from you currently.
I know you all need to be paid for what you do, however I think there's a huge opening for someone to be the guy not PAID for their opinion, someone to be REAL and review all the good stuff even if there's no$for your time.
The result could/ should end up being the most LOYAL and LARGEST most TRUSTED site and following, like, subscribe, etc of anyone.
Then you'll make your$ in power of the people and followers etc.
You could get real world products from real world buyers.
I've never seen a good full review, real world IMO on most guns unless done by the P.A. guy (Tom Gaylord? )(sorry if I'm wrong on name) but he's about the only guy besides you i see really take these guns out and test them.
I've got an Ataman tactical. 30 I'll donate for review, i ALWAYS see people looking for more info and reviews on Ataman but there's none.
I've got a Evanix. 357/9mm semi/ full auto GTL480 you should also review.
I have a .22 FX Impact Compact new in the box still unopened as of now, I also would like to give you to review.
I've also got a regulated .30 AAA Slayer I'm just waiting on a custom barrel to be chosen for and then I'd also like to give you that gun to review.
Then we'd just need one of those new Daystate bullpups and we'd IMO really be getting into having new content on many of the most looked for products needing more content out there.
I think videos not being made because no ones PAYING is DEFINITELY a huge part of the current disconnect with realistic thinkers like myself.
I just can't help but only belive about 40-60% of what I hear, see, feel, from a PAID REVIEW.