I’m in but I’d rather use paintball markers.Set up a ft course with laser tag equipment and see if any old men want to get serious about it.
I’m in but I’d rather use paintball markers.Set up a ft course with laser tag equipment and see if any old men want to get serious about it.
I disagree with you @Franklink. I agree that you have a perception that it is an arms race, as do some other shooters new to FT, but the 20fpe Hunter class and the use of bipods and 16x max magnification scopes really preclude the need to have high dollar equipment IF you have the other shooting skills necessary to excel at FT. As @Motorhead said stated above, high-dollar equipment will not make you a winner, and low-dollar equipment that you proposed can make you a winner along with good shooting skills.
There just doesn't seem to be a way to explain to some people that if they got after it like the top dogs, they might be a top dog. Most of us are unwilling to make the sacrifice, spend the hours, put in the monotonous practice, and do it until you bleed from your eyes. I know where I stand (and it took a long while to figure out, so I'm not criticizing) - but once you step in the big pool (*real* competition) you'd better figure out if the prize is worth the price, and realize that there are those who eat, drink, and sleep nothing but shooting. If you have *any* distractions, you need to figure out where you want to be, and be happy with that.I was at a match not long ago where my neighbor on the next bench quickly noticed I had a 3000$ scope and his only cost 600. We both had the same chronograph for about the same length of time and he had 36 sessions on his compared to my 900 plus. He's pretty sure I beat him because of my scope, though.
Jeff thats great !!!I’m in but I’d rather use paintball markers.
View attachment 523750
View attachment 523751
View attachment 523752
Nobody needs one of those scopes to be competitive.Disagreeing with folks is part of life.
I'll counter with how many Sighttron SIIIs are being used in Hunter class at 16x now.
SIII Field Target10-50x60 IR
Built for precision target shooting applications up to and exceeding 1000 yards. The Sightron SIII 10-50x60 Field Traget Long Range rifle scope with Illuminated reticle delivers superior optics and accuracy when it counts.sightron.com
For anybody that didn't follow the link, the SIII's are going for the budget friendly price of $1759.99. Likely find a deal on one somewhere for less than MSRP though. Heck might even get it all the way down to $1500 if a guy shops around and waits for a sale.
I'm not new to field target, just in the habit of calling a space a spade.
What's also telling is that you're calling a $1200-2100 rig "low-dollar."
You don’t need those scopes to be competitive, but they are extremely bright, which helps old eyes, and they were at a price point before COVID ($1000) that didn’t seem unreasonable. They don’t range any better than other scopes past 40yds at 16X. But a good Athlon scope and proper time spent bracketing on KZ’s and target bases can deliver winning performances.Disagreeing with folks is part of life.
I'll counter with how many Sighttron SIIIs are being used in Hunter class at 16x now.
SIII Field Target10-50x60 IR
Built for precision target shooting applications up to and exceeding 1000 yards. The Sightron SIII 10-50x60 Field Traget Long Range rifle scope with Illuminated reticle delivers superior optics and accuracy when it counts.sightron.com
For anybody that didn't follow the link, the SIII's are going for the budget friendly price of $1759.99. Likely find a deal on one somewhere for less than MSRP though. Heck might even get it all the way down to $1500 if a guy shops around and waits for a sale.
I'm not new to field target, just in the habit of calling a space a spade.
Cameeron Kerndt won the Worlds in Piston class with an Athlon Heras 15-60x56 $600 retail scope. And he can afford to shoot any scope he choses.You don’t need those scopes to be competitive, but they are extremely bright, which helps old eyes, and they were at a price point before COVID ($1000) that didn’t seem unreasonable. They don’t range any better than other scopes past 40yds at 16X. But a good Athlon scope and proper time spent bracketing on KZ’s and target bases can deliver winning performances.
There is a continuing theme in responses to your OP; spend time with your rifle, shooting FT, and developing the skills that will take you to the top. Philip Hepler is my friend and a prime example of this process and his way to the top. He even put together a series of FT shooting videos to help other new shooters get better!
when i was in High school and a completive person , sometimes i was on top other times i was not . my main goal was to not come in last . Same in FTYep I said it, and not for the first time.
Some sure seem to get heated up about that statement. Others are pragmatic enough to accept reality.
When guys are running "bb guns" that cost north of $8-10k, there's not much of an argument against it being an arms race.
When I say "arms race" I'm talking about the perpetual creep that results in ever bigger side wheels, more expensive scopes and guns, more complicated bipods, and generally more gadgetry for the classes where that's allowed, etc.
The arms race is a result of a combination of factors. First of those is that in any competition that is similarly equipment-dependent, you'll see the same thing. Competitors will spend big to acquire what they feel is the most competitive equipment. Another is the demographic....field target competitors are primarily a collection of well-to-do geezers, and many of those are retired, with the time and money to be silly about how they spend that time and money. Another is psychology...if I just buy THAT gun or THAT scope then I'll be at the top in future matches. In that sense, the arms race is as much a personal battle as it is a side-quest competition with the rest of the field. Furthermore, and another part of the psychology, is that it's simply fun to try out new guns and scopes. And who's going to buy a lower quality gun or scope than what they already have? So of course that feeds into the process of continually spending more and more and the average price of a rig in any given ft competition creeping up and up and up over the years. In that sense, some of the arms race is the over-used adage of, "you get what you pay for."
All of that is fine and dandy, and it's simply the reality of the field target game.
The negative aspect of the arms race is those rare times when a newcomer is at their first match and we have to tell them the price of the borrowed rig they're fondling. It's hard for them to envision themselves being part of the collection of field target competitors since they haven't mentally worked their way up to the great financial heights incrementally like most of us have. I say that from personal experience when I was new, and from the exact same facial expression I see when I introduce someone to field target.
As for the inevitable, "it's the indian, not the arrow" straw man logic rebuttals that are sure to come.....There is very certainly a price threshold that must be crossed to get into "competitive" territory. Yeah yeah, "so and so won with an entry level _______________ back in 20XX." Those cases are rare, and speak much to the skill of that individual competitor. In the main example I see used, that guy is now shooting a $3-4K scope/gun combo, NOT the entry level rig that he did well with that year. For most of us mere mortals, quality equipment ($$$) must be invested in if a guy has any intentions of being competitive, then of course comes practice to complete the rest of the winning equation. Hence my earlier statement about how equipment-dependent field target is.
And there you have the arms race.
(And with that, let the online battle commence).
You don’t need those scopes to be competitive, but they are extremely bright, which helps old eyes, and they were at a price point before COVID ($1000) that didn’t seem unreasonable. They don’t range any better than other scopes past 40yds at 16X. But a good Athlon scope and proper time spent bracketing on KZ’s and target bases can deliver winning performances.
There is a continuing theme in responses to your OP; spend time with your rifle, shooting FT, and developing the skills that will take you to the top. Philip Hepler is my friend and a prime example of this process and his way to the top. He even put together a series of FT shooting videos to help other new shooters get better!
This speaks to me.when i was in High school and a completive person , sometimes i was on top other times i was not . my main goal was to not come in last . Same in FT
Got a link to info on this rifle? Can the layman build one?I think guys get prickly because it's not an arms race.
It's not a cheap sport, though. It can be as cheap or as expensive as you want it to be.
The funny part of all this is that I could not afford to buy even a cheap pcp rifle...so I built my own. My homemade gun and a 300$ Mueller scope served me well my first ft season...although I did change out my scope for a used 350$ Leupold that someone got rid of in a fire sale.
Mike
I'm of the mind that most anyone can do whatever they want....if they want it bad enough.Got a link to info on this rifle? Can the layman build one?
Same sorta thing here ..I think guys get prickly because it's not an arms race.
It's not a cheap sport, though. It can be as cheap or as expensive as you want it to be.
The funny part of all this is that I could not afford to buy even a cheap pcp rifle...so I built my own. My homemade gun and a 300$ Mueller scope served me well my first ft season...although I did change out my scope for a used 350$ Leupold that someone got rid of in a fire sale.
Mike
I don't have the skills or courage to machine. My buddy was a machinist and showed me tons of videos of accidents they showed in safety classes.I'm of the mind that most anyone can do whatever they want....if they want it bad enough.
Mike