Filling an outdated carbon fiber/aluminum SCBA bottle

I think there is some confusion between factor of safety and overpressure factors used for hydrostatic testing.

The minimum factor of safety is probably 3.5 based on tensile strength. That puts 5/3 test pressure just below 1/2 of tensile strength, so below the endurance limit.

(5/3)x (tensile_strength/3.5)=0.48 x tensile strength

Actually, steel has an endurance limit, but not aluminum. So every over pressure event with aluminum will reduce its fatigue life a little bit.

Aerospace will often use a lower factor of safety. The trade off being reduced weight for more stringent QC and maintenance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeneT
I think the best source of well documented data on SCBA tanks is the Navy report. They have never had even a leak from anything other than damage to threads caused by hydro testing. No "explosions". They use thousands of tanks. Solid metal tanks might "explode". There was a video on this site at one time of one doing that at only a fairly mild overpressure. The same thread had a carbon fiber tank that failed but did not explode and they had to take out a big chunk of carbon fiber to get it to fail at over 10,000 psi. I do not believe that the available data supports those who theorize that carbon fiber tanks are susceptible to "explosion". I would not use one with obvious damage to the carbon fiber and if mine ever leaks it will get replaced. I also fill it using color changing desicant to make sure the air is dry going in. But with simple common sense precautions I am comfortable accepting any associated risk. I think my guns with their all aluminum storage chambers are more of a risk to me than my retired SCBA tank.