It is great but I'm always open to options, do tell.If your Impact is that great, there’s no need to.
Upvote 0
It is great but I'm always open to options, do tell.If your Impact is that great, there’s no need to.
Very interesting. Thanks for posting this. It’s nice to learn something and would definitely explain some things I noticed with my Leshiy classic that I do occasionally fill to 300b.View attachment 503061
The real gas charted is SCUBA quality air.
Notice that in the beginning you get more volume of air per bar than if it were an ideal gas until you reach the transition point between 230 and 250 bar where it takes a greater increase in pressure for the same volume gain.
The drawing is a compression curve from a dive shop manual.
Buy 700 bar (not shown) the real gas curve reaches a slope of 82° and the volume gained per increase in bar is nearly zero.
During decompression from 300 bar, you get a large drop in pressure for a very small amount of volume used.
Yes mostly pellets and sometime NSA 23gr, my barrel prefer 2175 over 217 and 2165 at this weight, reg at 100 bar and Macro at 16 for this NSA slug to fly at 920fps, Valve at 4. For pellets, the Macro between 3 to 8..I’m guessing you’re shooting pellets on your honeymoon. As long as you do and don’t succumb to tall tales from slug land, I’m almost positive you will enjoy the hell out of your gun until something fails. And as long as you’re not a tweakaholic, you might go a year or years. Enjoy.
Aaah, you’re a 50 yard guy. All the negative things guys say that seem to perplex you generally occur once you start stretching the gun out. Maybe there is a threshold where in order to deliver tight groups at extended distances, the gun gets finicky even at 50 or less. In your situation I wholeheartedly support your happiness claims. But I think the majority of Impact owners bought them to go long. That’s why you see a crazy amount of topics that are leaning negative, frustrated or mad.Yes mostly pellets and sometime NSA 23gr, my barrel prefer 2175 over 217 and 2165 at this weight, reg at 100 bar and Macro at 16 for this NSA slug to fly at 920fps, Valve at 4. For pellets, the Macro between 3 to 8..
I'm not obsessed with chasing after numbers, not a measurebator so I'm not the type to keep messing with the tuning or fixated on specific number, I don't really give a rat arse about the ES and DS as long as the shot connect and landed exactly where i wanted it to. The gun is dialed in, i don't even waste my time to check for fps after i found out what pellet and slug fly best at what speed and at which distance, unless there's flyers or something is off or doesn't feel right.
I tuned my M4 for maximum efficiency with the lowest noise floor, the current tune is covering a wide range of pellets from 14gr all the way up to slugs in 23gr, at the same 100 bar reg and valve at 4, the Macro/Micro wheel is flexible enough to cover the pellet and slug weight range that i'm shooting at, i'm getting 280~290 shots of pellets per refill from 250 bar down to 100 from the 480cc stock bottle, before it drop off of the reg. The gun feels balanced, operating smoothly, very quiet action, and efficiently...it doesn't feel any stress or being taxed, it's cruising at a very comfortable speed with plenty of untapped power on the table, POI is on point each and every single day I'm shooting it, so there's not a whole lot that i need to worry about other than picking it up and just have fun shooting it, and that's exactly what I'm getting out of this M4 so far....it's fun, and it's predictable.
Unless there's a need for me to drive much heavier slugs on target at much longer distance, otherwise the tune will stay exactly where it is now, or until something goes off track. i shoot mostly within 50 yard anyway, the standard barrel isn't picky on pellets so i could pretty much flip a coin and load whatever, or sling some NSA 23gr for no particular reason other than just for the hell of it.
Until something break or need maintenance, o'ring leak or whatever, i'll continue to enjoy the hell out of it as you said, to get my money worth..... for however long it may last.
Aaah, you’re a 50 yard guy. All the negative things guys say that seem to perplex you generally occur once you start stretching the gun out. Maybe there is a threshold where in order to deliver tight groups at extended distances, the gun gets finicky even at 50 or less. In your situation I wholeheartedly support your happiness claims. But I think the majority of Impact owners bought them to go long. That’s why you see a crazy amount of topics that are leaning negative, frustrated or mad.
There is a relationship between barrel twist rate, pellet MASS, pellet velocity, and the pellet's stability factor. Most people cannot tune an Impact because they are trying to throw the wrong weight pellet at the wrong velocity down a tube with the wrong twist rate for that weight of pellet and velocity which in turn produces a lousy stability factor for the pellet.For 100 yard and beyond, the slugs dominate. Haven't seen any breakthrough in pellet design to perform reliably and consistently at those long distance. I could expect the group to open up a lot wider even with slugs, it will be a lot more unpredictable, more sensitive to the element, and requires far more fine tuning and adjustments, and surely resulting in a hell lot more frustration for most people, and those challenges aren't going to be unique to impact alone. I'm going to have to take mine out to stretch its leg to 100+ yard, to see how it performs beyond the "comfort zone".
No. I have several guns that are always spot on all the time. Even with slugs. Even when I travel from 2,250ft where I live to my hunting camp at like 600ft. Solid barrel tank guns. Not comprised of too many parts and as easily influenced by temperature swings.
There is a relationship between barrel twist rate, pellet MASS, pellet velocity, and the pellet's stability factor. Most people cannot tune an Impact because they are trying to throw the wrong weight pellet at the wrong velocity down a tube with the wrong twist rate for that weight of pellet and velocity which in turn produces a lousy stability factor for the pellet.
As such, in their hands, the Impact sucks.
Ted Bier was/is a major fx flogger.... He continuously sings the praise of the mk2 over m3And it will be the same dribble when the M5 comes out!!
That's like asking how long it takes to get to Cheboygan without mentioning a starting point.How many shots on the 300cc bottle using slugs? thinking for huntting turkey and coyotes at 100 yards
Was hunting this morning and my first opportunity was a crow. I ranged it at 139 yards. This gun hasn’t been shot in at least a week. Dialed my scope and placed one in the center of its chest with a .30 slug. This topic came to mind. Try placing your first slug out of your Impact into a 1.5” zone at over 100 yards after your gun sits for a week. I can probably save you the trouble because in all likelihood, your beloved Impact won’t do it. After you get it warmed up, then maybe it will do it more times than not. Good hunting gun vs great hunting gun.It is great but I'm always open to options, do tell.
nice shot, but I don't think you're the authority on all others Impacts but thanks anyway.Was hunting this morning and my first opportunity was a crow. I ranged it at 139 yards. This gun hasn’t been shot in at least a week. Dialed my scope and placed one in the center of its chest with a .30 slug. This topic came to mind. Try placing your first slug out of your Impact into a 1.5” zone at over 100 yards after your gun sits for a week. I can probably save you the trouble because in all likelihood, your beloved Impact won’t do it. After you get it warmed up, then maybe it will do it more times than not. Good hunting gun vs great hunting gun.
View attachment 503366
Then prove me wrong. Let your Impact sit a couple days and cold shot that sucker at a target. Do 100 yards. You can cheat 40 yards. You don’t even have to post how it does. Or maybe you already know.nice shot, but I don't think you're the authority on all others Impacts but thanks anyway.
I believe you. Congratulations, you have some things figured out. It took me a while, experimenting and some machining to get mine to do it. I’m guessing you’re a 700mm guy?I do that often and always spot on but I wouldnt expect you to believe me as you have already made up your mind what you believe as for proving anything to you or anyone else, I don't feel the need. Enjoy your guns and I'll do the same.
No, it's actually a 600mm bone stock. I like shorter guns. I did have a Wildcat M3 sniper .25 that was extremely accurate, but I sold it. I like my Impact because of the power capability but this is my hunting gun, its much lighter and for the distances I take most small game there is plenty of power.I believe you. Congratulations, you have some things figured out. It took me a while, experimenting and some machining to get mine to do it. I’m guessing you’re a 700mm guy?