FX Impact scan
- Thread starter GQ
- Start date
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Where did you get if from? It does not look like the plug which is mounted in M3. There is no oring groove.
Upvote 0
I drew it, its for the new power block with its bigger O-rings, no O-ring on E-108, the bigger O-rings are in F-110, https://fxairguns.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/F10370-Impact-M3-1.pdf
the I didn't draw the O-rings grooves for O-ring E-103 (2.84x2.62 PUR90) and E-104 (5.5x1.5 NBR70) because I'm not such how the the bigger fits with the smaller one
I drew the whole rifle, started with the pdf image. I used Fusion 360.
Upvote 0
Ok, there is no groove at all. One oring is placed next to the other. You can learn from here: https://www.airgunnation.com/thread...-reg-creep-quasi-scientific-analysis.1175929/
Upvote 0
Thanks!
Do you know the thread size on this part? M12 will be too small, there is no M13 and M14 will be to big so it draw it as a ANSI unified screw thread, size 0.5in designation 1/2-32 UN
Upvote 0
Did you check it if dimensionally accurate?
If you want to revers engineer something correctly you need to measure the part correctly and design it with tolerances in assembly.
but doing like this from a graphics is ........... well...good amount of effort and definitely best intention, but this entire process is just for hobby, and that will surface only when you would want to fabricate.
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
I don't have an actual Impact M3 so T can't use measurements, it don't have to be a 1 to 1 copy of the original, (not the intention), and there is tolerances in the design, the thread and O-ring grooves are correct.
Upvote 0
I have revers engineered my MK2 in CAD, but only the parts I made machining changes also the fit to the surrounding parts, not the entire Impact...I am a mechanical designer that is why I said earlier.
Upvote 0