Just wondering if anyone is using lower priced thermal imaging monoculars and if they are reliable and have good quality imaging?
What's your budget? If it's under $1800 for a new unit, I would keep saving as most aren't worth getting within that price range unless you just want something like 30yds and in.Just wondering if anyone is using lower priced thermal imaging monoculars and if they are reliable and have good quality imaging?
I have been seeing advertisements for some in thr $500 range.What's your budget? If it's under $1800 for a new unit, I would keep saving as most aren't worth getting within that price range unless you just want something like 30yds and in.
@cahil_2 First off application matters a lot with thermal (distance, animal size, environment). I don’t know which ones you’re looking at, but I have a low priced one and a mid-tiered scanner. The difference in image quality is night and day. The questions are: would you like to see well enough to know that something is there? Or are you attempting to collect or post very clear thermal images for other purposes? Is it important for you to have crystal clear thermal image?I have been seeing advertisements for some in thr $500 range.
@cahil_2 Tree squirrels or ground squirrels? Either way I’d recommend a higher resolution - 384 minimum. Maybe you can swing a 256 for an entry level unit, but eventually you’ll probably want better resolution if you like thermal. What will really be important is the base magnification of the optic. For tree squirrels I recommend a lower base magnification 1x-2x. For ground squirrels no less than 3x, but the average distance you intend to shoot is also a factor in considering a desirable base magnification for a thermal optic.I was mainly interested in one to locate squirrels.