Quick note:
Don't click the YT link unless you are a real coach and love watching students take 30 minutes to take 4 shots.
Here is the problem. I can shoot through a sub half-inch hole with a .30 pellet at 25 yards. I can do it somewhat reliably so the result on the paper is multiple shots in one hole.
Sounds like I am bragging.
NO! I'm sucking like a Hoover and a Kirby made a demented lovechild that had to be euthanized.
I need help.
When the plate wobbles and falls from impact on the steel backer I decide to aim at the hole on paper 1" further away. NOW I string the shots like a toddlers sticky snot goober.
What am I doing differently? What marksmanship principle am I most likely missing when I shoot one inch further distance on paper?
These look like good shots but they are not. At 100 yards there would be at least an inch between POIs.
This is terminal sucktittude, the kind that is catching so you cannot just "embrace the suck." I must Get Gud; or die trying.
Don't click the YT link unless you are a real coach and love watching students take 30 minutes to take 4 shots.
Here is the problem. I can shoot through a sub half-inch hole with a .30 pellet at 25 yards. I can do it somewhat reliably so the result on the paper is multiple shots in one hole.
Sounds like I am bragging.
NO! I'm sucking like a Hoover and a Kirby made a demented lovechild that had to be euthanized.
I need help.
When the plate wobbles and falls from impact on the steel backer I decide to aim at the hole on paper 1" further away. NOW I string the shots like a toddlers sticky snot goober.
What am I doing differently? What marksmanship principle am I most likely missing when I shoot one inch further distance on paper?
These look like good shots but they are not. At 100 yards there would be at least an inch between POIs.
This is terminal sucktittude, the kind that is catching so you cannot just "embrace the suck." I must Get Gud; or die trying.