It occurred to me to mention some pass through testing I did in November of last year. I got curious and tested the remaining velocity of pellets after they went through a piece of 6mm luan and a piece of 1/4 MDF. Neither perfectly simulates a squirrel, of course. I think most parts of a squirrel would provide more resistance than these thin pieces of wood. I used my Prod which was shooting at FTTs just over 700 fps that day and my P35-177 shooting H&N 10.65 pellets at about 890 fps. The Prod projectile lost about 300 fps going through 6mm Luan plywood and about 370 fps going through 1/4 MDF. Looks like I only shot the 177 through the 1/4 MDF and it lost about 360 fps.
Trying to relate this to a squirrel is the hard part. These two guns will not shoot through two pieces of either material and rarely shoot through a squirrel. The 177 does it more than the Prod. These tests were right at the muzzle. But they shoot through this material at 25 yards too. Because the guns will consistently shoot through the 1/4 MDF, and do not consistently shoot through squirrels, I think the squirrel provides a bit more resistance. So assuming a projectile is slowed by at least 300 fps and more probably about 400 fps in 177 or 22 caliber when passing through a squirrel is probably a reasonable SWAG.
Trying to relate this to a squirrel is the hard part. These two guns will not shoot through two pieces of either material and rarely shoot through a squirrel. The 177 does it more than the Prod. These tests were right at the muzzle. But they shoot through this material at 25 yards too. Because the guns will consistently shoot through the 1/4 MDF, and do not consistently shoot through squirrels, I think the squirrel provides a bit more resistance. So assuming a projectile is slowed by at least 300 fps and more probably about 400 fps in 177 or 22 caliber when passing through a squirrel is probably a reasonable SWAG.
Upvote 0