I didn't plan to engage on this topic again but there is a book you most likely refer to that I have read most of and to the best of my knowledge it does not teach the lesson you propose. As a matter of fact it has examples of quite the opposite such as cutting an animals throat so that it's blood can be smeared around a door frame to protect your child from a ghost. Anyway we can't discuss circular logic here.Because the animal's life does not belong to me, I didnt create it. I dont think the animals were created just to serve us. I believe we were charged with dominion over animals, which includes the respectful care of them. Sometimes that means deciding to end one, to preserve another. So in all cases I do everything possible to have maximum effectiveness. Doing the bare minimum is not defensible in my opinion, no matter what you believe in. Even in your emergency scenario, being chased by a bear or whatever; be as fair and effective as you can. I dont see what is wrong with that? I think anything else is lazy. Might sound elitist but its not an idea I just made up on my own. It has been passed down father to child, for many generations. And your quoted reference can be seen as both the quickest, and healthiest way.
My dad told me many times when I was little: "You can tell a lot about a man by how he treats animals."
Rest assured I treat animals very well.
My point was on being realistic. As I said before... Kill when there is need and let live otherwise.
In other words if you're not going to eat it and it's no threat you should not be killing it. Others are free to think and do as they please, I'm only sharing my opinion.
Upvote 0