Huben Huben GK1 V3 red dot mount

Who makes the aluminum red dot mount? Think I missed that. Is it an RMR style mount?
Go gun and yes it's RMR style fits very right to the gun
Low.profile I like it better than the 3d printed ones I bought.
Also allows the red dot to sit lower.

Screenshot_20241026_083459_Chrome.jpg
 
I don't get it. Why do folks think the reflex sight needs to be over the receiver? It does not. If you do, the sight center is too high. The distance between barrel center and sight center needs to be as small as possible otherwise you have a hold over/hold under situation especially at short distances. The 11 mm rail on the shroud works perfectly. Unfortunately, many of the best small dot reflex sights use the 22 mm rail, but there is a spring loaded adaptor that adds no extra height and provides the best low mount sight line position.. That's the one to use.
 
I don't get it. Why do folks think the reflex sight needs to be over the receiver? It does not. If you do, the sight center is too high. The distance between barrel center and sight center needs to be as small as possible otherwise you have a hold over/hold under situation especially at short distances. The 11 mm rail on the shroud works perfectly. Unfortunately, many of the best small dot reflex sights use the 22 mm rail, but there is a spring loaded adaptor that adds no extra height and provides the best low mount sight line position.. That's the one to use.
for holstering maybe
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nutcracker
I don't get it. Why do folks think the reflex sight needs to be over the receiver? It does not. If you do, the sight center is too high. The distance between barrel center and sight center needs to be as small as possible otherwise you have a hold over/hold under situation especially at short distances. The 11 mm rail on the shroud works perfectly. Unfortunately, many of the best small dot reflex sights use the 22 mm rail, but there is a spring loaded adaptor that adds no extra height and provides the best low mount sight line position.. That's the one to use.
To keep the maximum amount of weight to the rear over the hand, and imo aesthetically it looks better. And as @Louie4321 just pointed out it’s better for holster availability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nutcracker
I don't get it. Why do folks think the reflex sight needs to be over the receiver? It does not. If you do, the sight center is too high. The distance between barrel center and sight center needs to be as small as possible otherwise you have a hold over/hold under situation especially at short distances. The 11 mm rail on the shroud works perfectly. Unfortunately, many of the best small dot reflex sights use the 22 mm rail, but there is a spring loaded adaptor that adds no extra height and provides the best low mount sight line position.. That's the one to use.
Because my GK1 soon won't have a rail on top of the shroud. I'm expecting it to be both lighter and quieter well not upsetting the balance.
1000001221.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJMDP
Because my GK1 soon won't have a rail on top of the shroud. I'm expecting it to be both lighter and quieter well not upsetting the balance.View attachment 508175
Thats Awesome!!!!!! I get it now. Just get rid of that barrel shroud and put Krazcools falcon rail on it with a muzzle break. You'll have the best looking airgun.
 
No falcon rail, too heavy, non-function shroud volume, but it looks great. Function over form!

Rear receiver mounted red dot, CF shroud with integrated moderator. This isn't the final length, just a test fit. I'm not sure if the CF shroud is low enough to use the stock rear sight. Probably not, thus mandating the use a red dot.

One concern is if the valve does an air dump is where are the piece going to fly? Best to wear eye protection and not have anyone standing to the sides or of course anywhere downrange.
 
Last edited:
Because my GK1 soon won't have a rail on top of the shroud. I'm expecting it to be both lighter and quieter well not upsetting the balance.View attachment 508175
the falcon is made out of aluminum and is half the size but cf is very light. Can you put a moderator on that shroud? I bet they weigh similar. Obviously your putting a rear stock on it so you'll have a nice carbine.
 
No falcon rail, too heavy, non-function shroud volume, but it looks great. Function over form!

Rear receiver mounted red dot, CF shroud with integrated moderator. This isn't the final length, just a test fit. I'm not sure if the CF shroud is low enough to use the stock rear sight. Probably not, thus mandating the use a red dot.

One concern is if the valve does an air dump is where are the piece going to fly? Best to wear eye protection and not have anyone standing to the sides or of course anywhere downrange.
I thought you said rear receiver red dot mount isn't good
 
I thought you said rear receiver red dot mount isn't good
No I was just asking if anyone used it. I think I will buy it as the open sights probably won't work. A 25 OD 1mm wall thickness CF is really light the aluminum shroud is many times heavier and won't help with sound reduction, because it's internal volume isn't utilized.
 
I am reading a lot of misconceptions here. Pistols MUST be nose heavy. If they are not, it is very difficult to shoot them accurately. This is caused because of your trigger finger side thrust. That side thrust is unavoidable simply because of how your finger is hinged at the joint.. Forward mass is your friend. It reduces the tendency to pull the barrel out of line at trigger release. Please note the addition of forward bob weights on Olympic pistols, that's why they are there.
 
I am reading a lot of misconceptions here. Pistols MUST be nose heavy. If they are not, it is very difficult to shoot them accurately. This is caused because of your trigger finger side thrust. That side thrust is unavoidable simply because of how your finger is hinged at the joint.. Forward mass is your friend. It reduces the tendency to pull the barrel out of line at trigger release. Please note the addition of forward bob weights on Olympic pistols, that's why they are there.
The GK1 already has a lot of forward weight due to barrel length and especially once you have a mod on it. I understand your point I just don’t need any additional weight there
 
I am reading a lot of misconceptions here. Pistols MUST be nose heavy. If they are not, it is very difficult to shoot them accurately. This is caused because of your trigger finger side thrust. That side thrust is unavoidable simply because of how your finger is hinged at the joint.. Forward mass is your friend. It reduces the tendency to pull the barrel out of line at trigger release. Please note the addition of forward bob weights on Olympic pistols, that's why they are there.
great advice!! Im in a pistol league and no matter what im always shooting to the right. The fire starter told me to try and think of squeezing the trigger straight back to you. When we replace our cardboard its always the right side that takes the abuse.
 
great advice!! Im in a pistol league and no matter what im always shooting to the right. The fire starter told me to try and think of squeezing the trigger straight back to you. When we replace our cardboard its always the right side that takes the abuse.
Question - if you didn't have a way to make your pistol nose heavy should you adjust your sight to the left? That way im not constantly fixated on that trigger squeeze. As you know there is 10 other things you have to think about and this would eliminate one.
 
I am reading a lot of misconceptions here. Pistols MUST be nose heavy. If they are not, it is very difficult to shoot them accurately. This is caused because of your trigger finger side thrust. That side thrust is unavoidable simply because of how your finger is hinged at the joint.. Forward mass is your friend. It reduces the tendency to pull the barrel out of line at trigger release. Please note the addition of forward bob weights on Olympic pistols, that's why they are there.
Btw my response wasn’t a dismissal of your points, just my opinion on the matter
 
great advice!! Im in a pistol league and no matter what im always shooting to the right. The fire starter told me to try and think of squeezing the trigger straight back to you. When we replace our cardboard its always the right side that takes the abuse.
Consistent grip and grip tension is critical to accurate shooting with a hand gun. Just as important is the position (forward/aft) of the physical trigger in the trigger housing. Fingers are different lengths. The ideal position of the trigger to minimize this side thrust should be 90 degrees to the center of finger rotation.