I sometimes wonder about the whole regulated thing. I guess those new to it believe that an unregulated rifle is grossly deficient from the regulated options. Truth be told, given my uses, I would be just as well served without regulation, and could eliminate a variable from potential issues. It is of value to certain competitive shooters, and is certainly a marketing tool. We tend to believe we need those things marketed to us.
Yep. Outside of precision target shooting, a regulator is not necessary and adds unnecessary complexity and failure points.
To back this up, I’ve shot 200 in the 30-Yard Challenge with two unregulated rifles:
Daystate Huntsman Regal .22
Reximex Daystar Pretensis .177
The Reximex is essentially a .177 Benjamin Cayden. They are virtually identical except for the stock. I paid $425 used off AGN Classifieds. It’s $550 new.
If you properly set up the hammer spring and fill to optimal pressure, you will get a very nice, stable, predictable shot string with an unregulated rifle - with superb reliability and without the additional complexity (and o-rings) a regulator adds.
The 30-Yard Challenge target has a 10-ring of 1/8” (.125”) diameter and an X of .04” diameter. You really need at least 24x scope magnification to see this target well enough to effectively manage your holds.
With the unregulated rifles I listed above, I’ve got 15+ consecutive cards scoring 192 and above.
I’m not some world class shooter. The points above are to show that you CAN even do precision target shooting at 30 and 40 yards with unregulated rifles. 20fps velocity spreads are NOT significant to point of impact at these distances (assuming you are shooting 825+ fps)
If your primary intent is to shoot 75 and 100 yard benchrest competitions with the rifle, then you will want a regulator, and every other tweak advantage you can get.
If most of the enthusiasts on this forum owned and shot an unregulated Huntsman for 6 months, I think it would significantly change their view as to what is “required” in an air rifle.
-Ed