I agree that the goal is 1 shot - 1 kill, but respectfully disagree that anything less is animal cruelty in FL. It is probably best not to debate this too much on a public forum; I'm happy to discuss via PM. However, I do believe we're in agreement on the heart of the matter anyway.
It is unfortunate that we live in world of hypersensitive people who are triggered by things they are ignorant of, so it is best to cya as best one can.
Florida has animal anti-cruelty laws like most (if not all) of the rest of the US.
I am not a lawyer, but believe the key phrase in the FL Statutes is "
Intentionally commits an act which results in a cruel death, or excessive or repeated infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering."
If someone
intended to "take" any game by targeting vitals as best they can, I believe follow up shot(s) are perfectly reasonable and would not constitute animal cruelty. On the other hand, just "shooting them up" without targeting vitals could be considered animal cruelty.
FL Statute 828.12 Cruelty to animals. - (2) A person who intentionally commits an act to any animal, or a person who owns or has the custody or control of any animal and fails to act, which results in the cruel death, or excessive or repeated infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering, or causes the same to be done, commits aggravated animal cruelty, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or by a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(a) A person convicted of a violation of this subsection, where the finder of fact determines that the violation includes the knowing and intentional torture or torment of an animal that injures, mutilates, or kills the animal, shall be ordered to pay a minimum mandatory fine of $2,500 and undergo psychological counseling or complete an anger management treatment program.