Just further supports just TWO primary classes ( Outside sub Piston category ) of The International WFTF as 1st, then OPEN Class that allows any legal >20 fpe gun, optics & gear afforded by the current class rules within the AAFTA as the 2nd.Knobs, I resemble that That's great!
Bill,
I'm usually on the same page with you, but in this case I don't think the Hunter class needs 24x. 16x is OK.
Bipods make a really big difference and that advantage needs a counter balance... Jackets & scope power are the only ones that's reasonable.
I do agree that MDs should not be allowed to disguise the blocks or angle them. It's harder, but I assume the kill zones are normal 1 -9/16" and range find on the kill zone most of the time. I can usually tell when they are not standard and forego bracketing if so, or one can also bracket the base of the target... usually that is consistent also.
I would hope the BoG would add that the blocks, if used, must be aligned squarely to the shooting box. That might be worth a formal proposal to the AAFTA Board.
Wayne
That was the intent for MANY match directors ACROSS the country ... Going back now what 7 years !!For those wanting higher magnification in Hunter class just shoot unlimited and do whatever you want to knock down targets and make it easier than it already is. I think instead of any rule changes in Hunter class if AAFTA recognized a Unlimited class that would satisfy the few that want changes in Hunter class due to their aging eye problems.
That would be great if there was a Hunter class limited to 12ft lbs and a 10x scope. Let's play the game the way the rest of the world plays it. Here in Ohio I don't hear of any Hunter guys complaining about 16x limit.
I would like to ask a question about this. Why are the blocks hidden or discussed? Also is there a reason that sometimes the targets are flat painted? I shoot a 15x scope and sometimes walk away from a target not knowing if I shot high, low or what. I really dont have a problem with what I wrote above. I figure its equal for everyone shooting that day but do wonder. After years of competition I have came to the place where I really don't care about the other guys score, winning only means there wasn't someone there at that time that wasn't better. Because there is always someone better.I do agree that MDs should not be allowed to disguise the blocks or angle them. It's harder, but I assume the kill zones are normal 1 -9/16" and range find on the kill zone most of the time. I can usually tell when they are not standard and forego bracketing if so, or one can also bracket the base of the target... usually that is consistent also.
i have been involved in many hobby's . In all of the things i have been involved in 10 people is the high number of workers. but it is not the limited workers I think it is the travel (time/ expense ) for me it is at least 3 hours one way and a different state to shoot an FT course . Maybe if people had a single lane or two ? even an open area no woods setting , really Field Target , some place to practice and be among others weather one or more people . I think that would be a boost to this game we playYears back when I was hooked on 3-D Bowhter Archery which eventually become the IBO I could go to New Hampshire every weekend and compete in a match with 300 to 400 shooters on a 30 target 15 lane course. We would start about 9am and the course would be completed by 2:30pm. We averaged 4 shooters per group with one shot per animal. Yardages were the same as FT and after lane completion we had to walk to the target and score / pull our arrows. If someone missed the target or passed through and had to look for their arrow which occurred frequently we would all help out finding it or not for at least a couple minutes before we would journey to the next lane. For two day events the targets would be moved for the second day (same course) and I never heard anyone complain about that. We had five classes and four divisions (Release aids, Fingers, Barebow, and Traditional). The game was much more family oriented than our Field Target which I think made something a family could do together on a weekend for $25.00. Now since leaving the game in 1995 I have heard the numbers are not what they use to be but for the 15 years I participated it grew almost every year. The cost of equipment back then was very similar as todays FT entry equipment and upgrades were of course much more. About the time I left the game top bows were close to $1000 and a heck of a lot longer that they are today. As FT is today the same 4 or 5 people did 90% of the work with occassional extra help for the bigger events.
I'm not sure exactly what my point was but a lot more people enjoyed about the same amount of real estate we use today in FT.
Bill Day
I don’t really care which Division I shoot in as I shoot them mostly all the same. Usually just a matter of which box I decide to check off. I don’t usually use a bucket, sticks, jacket, harness, riser, butthook, sling…so it’s all about the same, even pistol. I usually shoot Hunter but have shot them all.…
I really can care less what division anyone shoots...
Bill,Scott, You are made of rubber. Have seen very few shooters that sit straddled legs, lay their cheek on their right knee and aim and shoot like you can.
You are really gifted and a shooter I have a lot of respect for.
Bill Day
Yes, I agree...Why did this thread change from “Open Class Suffering”, to how and why to change the largest class at nearly every FT event?
Be very careful suggesting changes to the Hunter PCP rules. The next thread could very well be; “Why Is The Hunter PCP Class Suffering?”
Tom, every rule change we have made to the Hunter class has increased it popularity and that's a top reason why we are the biggest class. I could be wrong for I was once before.Why did this thread change from “Open Class Suffering”, to how and why to change the largest class at nearly every FT event?
Be very careful suggesting changes to the Hunter PCP rules. The next thread could very well be; “Why Is The Hunter PCP Class Suffering?”