is this plausible

[daddypaddy]

i have a low profile mounted laser zeroed between 1st zero(pellet trajectory rise) and 2nd zero(pellet trajectory drop) as a reference to possibly correct my parallax..assuming it’s mounted and zeroed near perfectly with the y-axis of my bore, im imagining it as a zero that that stays consistent with bore alignment regardless of where i’m looking through the scope.
looks like this through my scope since the laser isn’t zeroed the same distance as my scope. farther down range the green laser will eventually intersect with the center of my reticle. the red would represent the laser at even farther range.

i’ve been using it like this and my accuracy has been very consistent. am i just tricking myself? anyone else wanna try this out and give some input?

 

[Firewalker]

You have essentially copied the verticle crisshair function with 2 lasers. You would still need a level to ensure cant zero.

 

[daddypaddy]

i’m only using one laser when shooting. the image is a rough visual description. the green similar to what i see around 20 yards and the red would be that same green laser at say 110 yards(example only). i just used the color red to be to be able to represent with a depiction what i’m talking about without confusing the reader with two green lasers on one reticle. weirdly enough, the cant seems to be subconsciously adjusted for to a degree within my shooting range when using the laser like this.. but like i said, i could just be tricking myself. i’m asking people to try it out and see if they experience what i’m noticing but having a hard time to explaining.