jsb speed versus in flight stability question

But, what does all that really mean? Get a bunch of pellets and go test them. No free lunches.
my point is... i'm not here to feed the pellet manufacturing biz entire family, i'm here to become a better shot. That said, it shouldn't cost a fortune in time and money to find a "start" the process place to begin.
Why re-invent the wheel if the wheel is already round ? Start with that basic shape and low rolling resistance and invent the spokes and tires around it ... just my meandering mind, but, ya get the idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beerthief
Your pellet has its best BC when shot between about 830 - 920
09D70035-6ABC-47BF-BB3C-32897A67A280.1608820030.jpeg
 
Interesting that none of the .177 shooters have piped in? Esp the hunter field target peeps.
I am seeing a trend here - 860 fps upwards to 910 fps. What this does is give me and others a starting point and that's really what myself and others might be looking for. I am surprised the pellet makers don't share some projected best speeds and favorite barrels by pellet type and weight?
800 to 900 fps generally, no matter the weight. Above 950 most start to have issues, but there have been a few anomilies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cavedweller
its not that a certain weight/brand of pellets likes a certain speed
its that all pellets (no matter caliber/brand or weight) dont like to go too fast,
a product of their design if you will.

so what youre going to find is that no pellets like super fast speeds,
but they have no problem with slower speeds.

but when you get the speed up near the trans sonic region they can destabilize, and thats where accuracy suffers.

food for thought lol
So wouldn’t 565fps -700 be perfect for 50 yard or less Starling type targets? I’m thinking a .30 or .357 at 600-700 with pellets would be fantastic.
 
Here's another chart...
▪ it helps selecting appropriate pellets and slugs for a certain power settting, or
▪ it helps selecting an appropriate power level based on the amount of choices of pellets and slugs you want to have.

It assumes muzzle velocities that typically result in a fair amount of precision/ stability.

Matthias


❌ Attachment (PDF):
POWER Choices vs. Pellets/ Slug Choices

View attachment POWER. Choose It Wisely as It Restricts Pellet + Slug Options.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: Senor Ramon
Be careful when looking at the values on the JSB chart. They are using reference drag laws which are not suitable for pellets or slugs. For domed pellets they should be using the GA or GA2 drag laws which are specifically designed for pellets. There are no suitable drag laws for wadcutters or pointed pellets, but again the GA drag laws are probably best. There is a prototype drag law for slugs, but it needs more data and refinement. Most people currently use the G1 drag law for slugs, but it is not good at high speeds, hence the need for multiple BC values at different speeds. The use of the correct reference drag law should result in only small changes in BC at different speeds. Unfortunately, some manufacturers deliberately use the wrong reference drag law to give their projectiles artificially high BC values.

The main problem with the JSB list is that it does not give confidence that they entirely know what they are doing when it comes to external ballistic data and trajectory modelling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JungleShooter
Here's another chart...
▪ it helps selecting appropriate pellets and slugs for a certain power settting, or
▪ it helps selecting an appropriate power level based on the amount of choices of pellets and slugs you want to have.

It assumes muzzle velocities that typically result in a fair amount of precision/ stability.

Matthias


❌ Attachment (PDF):
POWER Choices vs. Pellets/ Slug Choices

View attachment 295242

Well researched and very detailed as ALWAYS! Thanks, Matthias.